IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v8y2023i9p138-d1229181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Landsat-5 for Accurate Historical LULC Classification: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models

Author

Listed:
  • Denis Krivoguz

    (Department of the “Oceanology”, Southern Federal University, 340015 Rostov-on-Don, Russia)

  • Sergei G. Chernyi

    (Department of Cyber-Physical Systems, St. Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Leninsky Prospect, 101, 198262 St. Petersburg, Russia
    Department of Electrical Equipment of Ships and Automation of Production, Kerch State Maritime Technological University, 298309 Kerch, Russia)

  • Elena Zinchenko

    (Department of Cyber-Physical Systems, St. Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Leninsky Prospect, 101, 198262 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Artem Silkin

    (Department of Cyber-Physical Systems, St. Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Leninsky Prospect, 101, 198262 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Anton Zinchenko

    (Department of Cyber-Physical Systems, St. Petersburg State Marine Technical University, Leninsky Prospect, 101, 198262 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

This study investigates the application of various machine learning models for land use and land cover (LULC) classification in the Kerch Peninsula. The study utilizes archival field data, cadastral data, and published scientific literature for model training and testing, using Landsat-5 imagery from 1990 as input data. Four machine learning models (deep neural network, Random Forest, support vector machine (SVM), and AdaBoost) are employed, and their hyperparameters are tuned using random search and grid search. Model performance is evaluated through cross-validation and confusion matrices. The deep neural network achieves the highest accuracy (96.2%) and performs well in classifying water, urban lands, open soils, and high vegetation. However, it faces challenges in classifying grasslands, bare lands, and agricultural areas. The Random Forest model achieves an accuracy of 90.5% but struggles with differentiating high vegetation from agricultural lands. The SVM model achieves an accuracy of 86.1%, while the AdaBoost model performs the lowest with an accuracy of 58.4%. The novel contributions of this study include the comparison and evaluation of multiple machine learning models for land use classification in the Kerch Peninsula. The deep neural network and Random Forest models outperform SVM and AdaBoost in terms of accuracy. However, the use of limited data sources such as cadastral data and scientific articles may introduce limitations and potential errors. Future research should consider incorporating field studies and additional data sources for improved accuracy. This study provides valuable insights for land use classification, facilitating the assessment and management of natural resources in the Kerch Peninsula. The findings contribute to informed decision-making processes and lay the groundwork for further research in the field.

Suggested Citation

  • Denis Krivoguz & Sergei G. Chernyi & Elena Zinchenko & Artem Silkin & Anton Zinchenko, 2023. "Using Landsat-5 for Accurate Historical LULC Classification: A Comparison of Machine Learning Models," Data, MDPI, vol. 8(9), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:9:p:138-:d:1229181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/9/138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/8/9/138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Megersa Kebede Leta & Tamene Adugna Demissie & Jens Tränckner, 2021. "Modeling and Prediction of Land Use Land Cover Change Dynamics Based on Land Change Modeler (LCM) in Nashe Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-24, March.
    2. Mark A. Drummond & Michael P. Stier & James (Jay) E. Diffendorfer, 2019. "Historical land use and land cover for assessing the northern Colorado Front Range urban landscape," Journal of Maps, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(2), pages 89-93, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hammad Ul Hussan & Hua Li & Qinhuo Liu & Barjeece Bashir & Tian Hu & Shouyi Zhong, 2024. "Investigating Land Cover Changes and Their Impact on Land Surface Temperature in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-20, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alule, RJ & Nuwategeka, E & Oriangi, G, 2023. "Assessment Of Population Dynamics And Forest Cover Change In Yumbe District, Uganda," African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development (AJFAND), vol. 23(5), May.
    2. Harik, G. & Alameddine, I. & Zurayk, R. & El-Fadel, M., 2023. "Uncertainty in forecasting land cover land use at a watershed scale: Towards enhanced sustainable land management," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 486(C).
    3. Chengjie Yang & Ruren Li & Zongyao Sha, 2020. "Exploring the Dynamics of Urban Greenness Space and Their Driving Factors Using Geographically Weighted Regression: A Case Study in Wuhan Metropolis, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-21, December.
    4. Belay Z. Abate & Tewodros T. Assefa & Tibebe B. Tigabu & Wubneh B. Abebe & Li He, 2023. "Hydrological Modeling of the Kobo-Golina River in the Data-Scarce Upper Danakil Basin, Ethiopia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-23, February.
    5. Yang Zhang & Nazhalati Naerkezi & Yun Zhang & Bo Wang, 2024. "Multi-Scenario Land Use/Cover Change and Its Impact on Carbon Storage Based on the Coupled GMOP-PLUS-InVEST Model in the Hexi Corridor, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Yajun Ma & Ping Zhang & Kaixu Zhao & Yong Zhou & Sidong Zhao, 2022. "A Dynamic Performance and Differentiation Management Policy for Urban Construction Land Use Change in Gansu, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-31, June.
    7. Yilun Zhao & Yan Rong & Yiyi Liu & Tianshu Lin & Liangji Kong & Qinqin Dai & Runzi Wang, 2023. "Investigating Urban Flooding and Nutrient Export under Different Urban Development Scenarios in the Rouge River Watershed in Michigan, USA," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-25, December.
    8. Markos Mathewos & Semaria Moga Lencha & Misgena Tsegaye, 2022. "Land Use and Land Cover Change Assessment and Future Predictions in the Matenchose Watershed, Rift Valley Basin, Using CA-Markov Simulation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Jie Chen & Ruijie Shi & Geng Sun & Ya Guo & Min Deng & Xiuyuan Zhang, 2023. "Simulation-Based Optimization of the Urban Thermal Environment through Local Climate Zones Reorganization in Changsha City, China with the FLUS Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-28, August.
    10. Mustafa Erdem Kabadayı & Paria Ettehadi Osgouei & Elif Sertel, 2022. "Agricultural Land Abandonment in Bulgaria: A Long-Term Remote Sensing Perspective, 1950–1980," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-24, October.
    11. Yecheng He & Weicheng Wu & Xinyuan Xie & Xinxin Ke & Yifei Song & Cuimin Zhou & Wenjing Li & Yuan Li & Rong Jing & Peixia Song & Linqian Fu & Chunlian Mao & Meng Xie & Sicheng Li & Aohui Li & Xiaoping, 2023. "Land Use/Cover Change Prediction Based on a New Hybrid Logistic-Multicriteria Evaluation-Cellular Automata-Markov Model Taking Hefei, China as an Example," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-27, October.
    12. Rupak Goswami & Riya Roy & Dipjyoti Gangopadhyay & Poulami Sen & Kalyan Roy & Sukamal Sarkar & Sanchayeeta Misra & Krishnendu Ray & Marta Monjardino & Mohammed Mainuddin, 2024. "Understanding Resource Recycling and Land Management to Upscale Zero-Tillage Potato Cultivation in the Coastal Indian Sundarbans," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-23, January.
    13. Sujarwo & Aditya Nugraha Putra & Raden Arief Setyawan & Heitor Mancini Teixeira & Uma Khumairoh, 2022. "Forecasting Rice Status for a Food Crisis Early Warning System Based on Satellite Imagery and Cellular Automata in Malang, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Haile Belay & Assefa M. Melesse & Getachew Tegegne, 2024. "Scenario-Based Land Use and Land Cover Change Detection and Prediction Using the Cellular Automata–Markov Model in the Gumara Watershed, Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-34, March.
    15. René Ulloa-Espíndola & Susana Martín-Fernández, 2021. "Simulation and Analysis of Land Use Changes Applying Cellular Automata in the South of Quito and the Machachi Valley, Province of Pichincha, Ecuador," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Raquel Faria de Deus & José António Tenedório & Denise Pumain & Jorge Rocha & Margarida Pereira, 2023. "100 Years of Land-Use and Land-Cover Data: What Has Been the Effect of Spatial Planning in Coastal Land-Use and Land-Cover Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-20, May.
    17. Parviz Azizi & Ali Soltani & Farokh Bagheri & Shahrzad Sharifi & Mehdi Mikaeili, 2022. "An Integrated Modelling Approach to Urban Growth and Land Use/Cover Change," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-26, October.
    18. Motuma Shiferaw Regasa & Michael Nones, 2022. "Past and Future Land Use/Land Cover Changes in the Ethiopian Fincha Sub-Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-20, August.
    19. Sina Mallah & Manouchehr Gorji & Mohammad Reza Balali & Hossein Asadi & Naser Davatgar & Hojjat Varmazyari & Anna Maria Stellacci & Mirko Castellini, 2023. "Deep Insight on Land Use/Land Cover Geospatial Assessment through Internet-Based Validation Tool in Upper Karkheh River Basin (KRB), South-West Iran," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, April.
    20. Muhammad Mohiuddin & Jawad Ali & Megersa Kebede Leta & Muhammad Waseem & Muhammad Irshad & Zahid Hussain, 2021. "Estimation of Iodine Leaching in Soil Amended with Organic and Inorganic Materials Using HYDRUS 1-D Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-13, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:8:y:2023:i:9:p:138-:d:1229181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.