IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jdataj/v7y2022i4p44-d788723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Social Media to Detect Fake News Information Related to Product Marketing: The FakeAds Corpus

Author

Listed:
  • Noha Alnazzawi

    (Computer Science and Engineering Department, Yanbu University College, Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu, Yanbu Industrial City 41912, Saudi Arabia)

  • Najlaa Alsaedi

    (Computer Science Department, King Abdul Aziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

  • Fahad Alharbi

    (Data Management Specialist, Ministry of Interior, Public Security, Riyadh 12732, Saudi Arabia)

  • Najla Alaswad

    (Data Analyst Specialist, Princess Norah University, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

Nowadays, an increasing portion of our lives is spent interacting online through social media platforms, thanks to the widespread adoption of the latest technology and the proliferation of smartphones. Obtaining news from social media platforms is fast, easy, and less expensive compared with other traditional media platforms, e.g., television and newspapers. Therefore, social media is now being exploited to disseminate fake news and false information. This research aims to build the FakeAds corpus, which consists of tweets for product advertisements. The aim of the FakeAds corpus is to study the impact of fake news and false information in advertising and marketing materials for specific products and which types of products (i.e., cosmetics, health, fashion, or electronics) are targeted most on Twitter to draw the attention of consumers. The corpus is unique and novel, in terms of the very specific topic (i.e., the role of Twitter in disseminating fake news related to production promotion and advertisement) and also in terms of its fine-grained annotations. The annotation guidelines were designed with guidance by a domain expert, and the annotation is performed by two domain experts, resulting in a high-quality annotation, with agreement rate F-scores as high as 0.815.

Suggested Citation

  • Noha Alnazzawi & Najlaa Alsaedi & Fahad Alharbi & Najla Alaswad, 2022. "Using Social Media to Detect Fake News Information Related to Product Marketing: The FakeAds Corpus," Data, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-13, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:44-:d:788723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/7/4/44/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2306-5729/7/4/44/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nida Aslam & Irfan Ullah Khan & Farah Salem Alotaibi & Lama Abdulaziz Aldaej & Asma Khaled Aldubaikil & M. Irfan Uddin, 2021. "Fake Detect: A Deep Learning Ensemble Model for Fake News Detection," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-8, April.
    2. Carvalho, Carlos & Klagge, Nicholas & Moench, Emanuel, 2011. "The persistent effects of a false news shock," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 597-615, September.
    3. Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse, 2019. "Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sergio Bolívar & Alicia Nieto-Reyes & Heather L. Rogers, 2023. "Statistical Depth for Text Data: An Application to the Classification of Healthcare Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Andreea Nistor & Eduard Zadobrischi, 2022. "The Influence of Fake News on Social Media: Analysis and Verification of Web Content during the COVID-19 Pandemic by Advanced Machine Learning Methods and Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-24, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ciprian-Octavian Truică & Elena-Simona Apostol, 2023. "It’s All in the Embedding! Fake News Detection Using Document Embeddings," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Ciprian-Octavian Truică & Elena-Simona Apostol, 2022. "MisRoBÆRTa: Transformers versus Misinformation," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, February.
    3. Carlos Carrasco-Farré, 2022. "The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Uğur Baloğlu, 2021. "Trolls, Pressure and Agenda: The discursive fight on Twitter in Turkey," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(4), pages 39-51.
    5. Germano, Fabrizio & Sobbrio, Francesco, 2020. "Opinion dynamics via search engines (and other algorithmic gatekeepers)," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    6. Mujtaba Ali Isani, 2021. "Methodological Problems of Using Arabic-Language Twitter as a Gauge for Arab Attitudes Toward Politics and Society," Contemporary Review of the Middle East, , vol. 8(1), pages 22-35, March.
    7. Nwaibeh, E.A. & Chikwendu, C.R., 2023. "A deterministic model of the spread of scam rumor and its numerical simulations," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 111-129.
    8. Arcuri, Maria Cristina & Gandolfi, Gino & Russo, Ivan, 2023. "Does fake news impact stock returns? Evidence from US and EU stock markets," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 125.
    9. Sven Gruener, 2024. "Determinants of Gullibility to Misinformation: A Study of Climate Change, COVID-19 and Artificial Intelligence," Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, , vol. 36(1), pages 58-78, January.
    10. Joel Peress, 2014. "The Media and the Diffusion of Information in Financial Markets: Evidence from Newspaper Strikes," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 69(5), pages 2007-2043, October.
    11. Raffaele D’Ambrosio & Giuseppe Giordano & Serena Mottola & Beatrice Paternoster, 2021. "Stiffness Analysis to Predict the Spread Out of Fake Information," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-10, August.
    12. Peter Koudijs, 2013. "The boats that did not sail: Asset Price Volatility and Market Efficiency in a Natural Experiment," NBER Working Papers 18831, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    13. John Bryden & Eric Silverman, 2019. "Underlying socio-political processes behind the 2016 US election," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    14. Román Alejandro Mendoza Urdiales & Andrés García-Medina & José Antonio Nuñez Mora, 2021. "Measuring information flux between social media and stock prices with Transfer Entropy," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(9), pages 1-19, September.
    15. Peter D. Lunn & Cameron A. Belton & Ciarán Lavin & Féidhlim P. McGowan & Shane Timmons & Deirdre A. Robertson, 2020. "Using behavioral science to help fight the Coronavirus," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 3(1).
    16. Yuriy Gorodnichenko & Tho Pham & Oleksandr Talavera, 2023. "The Voice of Monetary Policy," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 113(2), pages 548-584, February.
    17. James Flamino & Alessandro Galeazzi & Stuart Feldman & Michael W. Macy & Brendan Cross & Zhenkun Zhou & Matteo Serafino & Alexandre Bovet & Hernán A. Makse & Boleslaw K. Szymanski, 2023. "Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 904-916, June.
    18. Akyildirim, Erdinc & Corbet, Shaen & Efthymiou, Marina & Guiomard, Cathal & O'Connell, John F. & Sensoy, Ahmet, 2020. "The financial market effects of international aviation disasters," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Ambrocio, Gene & Hasan, Iftekhar, 2022. "Belief polarization and Covid-19," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 10/2022, Bank of Finland.
    20. Matthew Spradling & Jeremy Straub, 2022. "Evaluation of the Factors That Impact the Perception of Online Content Trustworthiness by Income, Political Affiliation and Online Usage Time," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-55, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jdataj:v:7:y:2022:i:4:p:44-:d:788723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.