IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v3y2013i4p599-612d29065.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of CO 2 Application Requirements for On-Farm Mass Depopulation of Swine in a Disease Emergency

Author

Listed:
  • Larry Stikeleather

    (Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • William Morrow

    (Animal Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Robert Meyer

    (Department of Clinical Studies, College of Vet Medicine, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA)

  • Craig Baird

    (Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

  • Burt Halbert

    (Department of Biological & Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA)

Abstract

When an emergency swine disease outbreak, such as foot-and-mouth disease (FMD), occurs, it will be necessary to rapidly and humanely depopulate and dispose of infected and susceptible pigs to limit viral replications and disease spread. Methods other than handling individual pigs will be required to achieve the necessary rapidity. Suitable and practical on-farm methods will require depopulating large numbers of pigs at a time outside confinement buildings. The process must be easily implemented with readily available materials and equipment, while providing for the safety and well-being of personnel. Carbon dioxide gas (CO 2 ) is the means of choice, and this study analyzed the methods and requirements for delivering the gas into large volume truck bodies, corrals, dumpsters or other such chambers that may be used. The issues studied included: How the gas should be introduced to achieve the needed spatial distribution; whether plenums are required in the chambers; and the importance of sealing all chamber cracks and edges except around the top cover to limit CO 2 dilution and leakage. Analysis was done using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software, and primary results were verified experimentally. The CFD findings and experimental results are compared, and recommendations are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Larry Stikeleather & William Morrow & Robert Meyer & Craig Baird & Burt Halbert, 2013. "Evaluation of CO 2 Application Requirements for On-Farm Mass Depopulation of Swine in a Disease Emergency," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-14, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:599-612:d:29065
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/4/599/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/3/4/599/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil M. Ferguson & Christl A. Donnelly & Roy M. Anderson, 2001. "Transmission intensity and impact of control policies on the foot and mouth epidemic in Great Britain," Nature, Nature, vol. 413(6855), pages 542-548, October.
    2. Babcock, Bruce A. & Fabiosa, Jacinto F. & Matthey, Holger & Isik, Murat & Tokgoz, Simla & Elobeid, Amani & Meyer, Seth D. & Fuller, Frank H. & Hart, Chad E. & Saak, Alexander & Kovarik, Karen P., 2004. "Factors Affecting World Agriculture," Staff General Research Papers Archive 12757, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ian E. Fellows & Mark S. Handcock, 2023. "Modeling of networked populations when data is sampled or missing," METRON, Springer;Sapienza Università di Roma, vol. 81(1), pages 21-35, April.
    2. repec:plo:pcbi00:1003587 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Rob Deardon & Babak Habibzadeh & Hau Yi Chung, 2012. "Spatial measurement error in infectious disease models," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(5), pages 1139-1150, November.
    4. Ioannidis, John P.A. & Cripps, Sally & Tanner, Martin A., 2022. "Forecasting for COVID-19 has failed," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 38(2), pages 423-438.
    5. Don Klinkenberg & Christophe Fraser & Hans Heesterbeek, 2006. "The Effectiveness of Contact Tracing in Emerging Epidemics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(1), pages 1-7, December.
    6. Krämer, J. & Farwick, J., . "Schäden in der Landwirtschaft durch Maul- und Klauenseuche: Simulationsrechnungen für ausgewählte Modellregionen," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 44.
    7. Thomas Rawson & Christian Morgenstern & Edward S. Knock & Joseph Hicks & Anh Pham & Guillaume Morel & Aurelio Cabezas Murillo & Michael W. Sanderson & Giovanni Forchini & Richard FitzJohn & Katharina , 2025. "A mathematical model of H5N1 influenza transmission in US dairy cattle," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-12, December.
    8. Rakowski, Franciszek & Gruziel, Magdalena & Bieniasz-Krzywiec, Łukasz & Radomski, Jan P., 2010. "Influenza epidemic spread simulation for Poland — a large scale, individual based model study," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 389(16), pages 3149-3165.
    9. Langmüller, Anna M. & Hermisson, Joachim & Murdock, Courtney C. & Messer, Philipp W., 2025. "Catching a wave: On the suitability of traveling-wave solutions in epidemiological modeling," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 1-12.
    10. Wenting Yang & Jiantong Zhang & Ruolin Ma, 2020. "The Prediction of Infectious Diseases: A Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    11. Montazeri Hesam & Little Susan & Mozaffarilegha Mozhgan & Beerenwinkel Niko & DeGruttola Victor, 2020. "Bayesian reconstruction of transmission trees from genetic sequences and uncertain infection times," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 19(4-6), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Tom Lindström & Daniel A Grear & Michael Buhnerkempe & Colleen T Webb & Ryan S Miller & Katie Portacci & Uno Wennergren, 2013. "A Bayesian Approach for Modeling Cattle Movements in the United States: Scaling up a Partially Observed Network," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, January.
    13. Peter Brommesson & Uno Wennergren & Tom Lindström, 2016. "Spatiotemporal Variation in Distance Dependent Animal Movement Contacts: One Size Doesn’t Fit All," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-20, October.
    14. Thomas House & Matt J Keeling, 2010. "The Impact of Contact Tracing in Clustered Populations," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(3), pages 1-9, March.
    15. Alzahrani, Abdullah K. & Alshomrani, Ali Saleh & Pal, Nikhil & Samanta, Sudip, 2018. "Study of an eco-epidemiological model with Z-type control," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 197-208.
    16. repec:sae:envval:v:15:y:2006:i:4:p:441-462 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Marco J Morelli & Gaël Thébaud & Joël Chadœuf & Donald P King & Daniel T Haydon & Samuel Soubeyrand, 2012. "A Bayesian Inference Framework to Reconstruct Transmission Trees Using Epidemiological and Genetic Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-14, November.
    18. Yuan, Xinpeng & Xue, Yakui & Liu, Maoxing, 2013. "Analysis of an epidemic model with awareness programs by media on complex networks," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-11.
    19. Namilae, S. & Srinivasan, A. & Mubayi, A. & Scotch, M. & Pahle, R., 2017. "Self-propelled pedestrian dynamics model: Application to passenger movement and infection propagation in airplanes," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 248-260.
    20. Boni, Maciej F. & Galvani, Alison P. & Wickelgren, Abraham L. & Malani, Anup, 2013. "Economic epidemiology of avian influenza on smallholder poultry farms," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 135-144.
    21. Maud Marsot & Séverine Rautureau & Barbara Dufour & Benoit Durand, 2014. "Impact of Stakeholders Influence, Geographic Level and Risk Perception on Strategic Decisions in Simulated Foot and Mouth Disease Epizootics in France," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(1), pages 1-16, January.
    22. Parham, Paul E. & Singh, Brajendra K. & Ferguson, Neil M., 2008. "Analytic approximation of spatial epidemic models of foot and mouth disease," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 73(3), pages 349-368.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:3:y:2013:i:4:p:599-612:d:29065. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.