IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i9p975-d1646514.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Video Behavior Detection and Analysis Model for Sow Estrus Cycle Based on Deep Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Kaidong Lei

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030800, China)

  • Bugao Li

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030800, China)

  • Shan Zhong

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030800, China)

  • Hua Yang

    (College of Information Science and Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taiyuan 030800, China)

  • Hao Wang

    (College of Engineering, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiangfang Tang

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

  • Benhai Xiong

    (State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Against the backdrop of precision livestock farming, sow behavior analysis holds significant theoretical and practical value. Traditional production methods face challenges such as low production efficiency, high labor intensity, and increased disease prevention risks. With the rapid advancement of optoelectronic technology and deep learning, more technologies are being integrated into smart agriculture. Intelligent large-scale pig farming has become an effective means to improve sow quality and productivity, with behavior recognition technology playing a crucial role in intelligent pig farming. Specifically, monitoring sow behavior enables an effective assessment of health conditions and welfare levels, ensuring efficient and healthy sow production. This study constructs a 3D-CNN model based on video data from the sow estrus cycle, achieving analysis of SOB, SOC, SOS, and SOW behaviors. In typical behavior classification, the model attains accuracy, recall, and F1-score values of (1.00, 0.90, 0.95; 0.96, 0.98, 0.97; 1.00, 0.96, 0.98; 0.86, 1.00, 0.93), respectively. Additionally, under conditions of multi-pig interference and non-specifically labeled data, the accuracy, recall, and F1-scores for the semantic recognition of SOB, SOC, SOS, and SOW behaviors based on the 3D-CNN model are (1.00, 0.90, 0.95; 0.89, 0.89, 0.89; 0.91, 1.00, 0.95; 1.00, 1.00, 1.00), respectively. These findings provide key technical support for establishing the classification and semantic recognition of typical sow behaviors during the estrus cycle, while also offering a practical solution for rapid video-based behavior detection and welfare monitoring in precision livestock farming.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaidong Lei & Bugao Li & Shan Zhong & Hua Yang & Hao Wang & Xiangfang Tang & Benhai Xiong, 2025. "Research on Video Behavior Detection and Analysis Model for Sow Estrus Cycle Based on Deep Learning," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:975-:d:1646514
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/9/975/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/9/975/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. E. M. B. M. Karunathilake & Anh Tuan Le & Seong Heo & Yong Suk Chung & Sheikh Mansoor, 2023. "The Path to Smart Farming: Innovations and Opportunities in Precision Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-26, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Anastasios Michailidis & Chrysanthi Charatsari & Thomas Bournaris & Efstratios Loizou & Aikaterini Paltaki & Dimitra Lazaridou & Evagelos D. Lioutas, 2024. "A First View on the Competencies and Training Needs of Farmers Working with and Researchers Working on Precision Agriculture Technologies," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-12, January.
    2. Thana Sarttra & Tossapol Kiatcharoenpol, 2025. "Enhancing Sustainable Herd Structure Management in Thai Dairy Cooperatives Through Dynamic Programming Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    3. Deniz Uztürk & Gülçin Büyüközkan, 2023. "Strategic Analysis for Advancing Smart Agriculture with the Analytic SWOT/PESTLE Framework: A Case for Turkey," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-25, December.
    4. Maximilian Lackner & Maghsoud Besharati, 2025. "Agricultural Waste: Challenges and Solutions, a Review," Waste, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-32, June.
    5. Anca Antoaneta Vărzaru, 2025. "Digital Revolution in Agriculture: Using Predictive Models to Enhance Agricultural Performance Through Digital Technology," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-31, January.
    6. Luca Preite & Federico Solari & Giuseppe Vignali, 2025. "Water Management Optimization in Agriculture: a Digital Model Development," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 39(3), pages 1261-1279, February.
    7. Zanele Adams & Albert Thembinkosi Modi & Simon Kamande Kuria, 2025. "Multidimensional Perspective of Sustainable Agroecosystems and the Impact on Crop Production: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-26, March.
    8. Tengfei Zhang & Jinhao Zhou & Wei Liu & Rencai Yue & Jiawei Shi & Chunjian Zhou & Jianping Hu, 2024. "SN-CNN: A Lightweight and Accurate Line Extraction Algorithm for Seedling Navigation in Ridge-Planted Vegetables," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, August.
    9. Chenchen Song & Zhiling Guo & Xiaoyue Ma & Jijiang He & Zhengguang Liu, 2025. "Evaluating the Role of Next-Generation Productive Forces in Mitigating Carbon Lock-In: Evidence from Regional Disparities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-29, May.
    10. Biedny, Christina & Whitacre, Brian E. & Van Leuven, Andrew J., 2024. "Do Gigabits Mean Business? “Ultra-Fast” broadband availability's effect on business births," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    11. Saqib, Shahab E. & Kaleem, Muhammad & Yaseen, Muhammad & Yang, Shang-Ho & Visetnoi, Supawan, 2024. "From green fields to housing societies: Unraveling the mysteries behind agricultural land conversion in Pakistan," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Puiu-Lucian Georgescu & Nicoleta Barbuta-Misu & Monica Laura Zlati & Costinela Fortea & Valentin Marian Antohi, 2025. "Quantifying the Performance of European Agriculture Through the New European Sustainability Model," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    13. Raihan, Asif, 2024. "A review of the potential opportunities and challenges of the digital economy for sustainability," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 3(4).
    14. Imran Hussain & Xiongzhe Han & Jong-Woo Ha, 2025. "Stereo Visual Odometry and Real-Time Appearance-Based SLAM for Mapping and Localization in Indoor and Outdoor Orchard Environments," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-26, April.
    15. Mary Sanyaolu & Arkadiusz Sadowski, 2024. "The Role of Precision Agriculture Technologies in Enhancing Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-17, August.
    16. Dimitrios Kalfas & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Olympia Papaevangelou & Katerina Melfou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2024. "Integration of Technology in Agricultural Practices towards Agricultural Sustainability: A Case Study of Greece," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, March.
    17. Wenjie Li & Guanyu Guo & Huangying Gu & Shuhao Lai & Yuanjie Duan & Chengming Li, 2024. "Digital Economy as a Buffer: Alleviating the Adverse Effects of Land Resource Mismatch on Food Security," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, October.
    18. Soum, Abderrahmane & Ayache, Abbassia, 2025. "Adopting precision agriculture in Algeria: insights and challenges from the perspective of Algerian agricultural engineers," Western Balkan Journal of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development (WBJAERD), Institute of Agricultural Economics, vol. 7(1), January.
    19. Luciana Di Gregorio & Lorenzo Nolfi & Arianna Latini & Nikolaos Nikoloudakis & Nils Bunnefeld & Maurizio Notarfonso & Roberta Bernini & Ioannis Manikas & Annamaria Bevivino, 2024. "Getting (ECO)Ready: Does EU Legislation Integrate Up-to-Date Scientific Data for Food Security and Biodiversity Preservation Under Climate Change?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Jeannette Aduhene-Chinbuah & Clement Oppong Peprah, 2024. "Multi-risk management in Ghana's agricultural sector: Strategies, actors, and conceptual shifts—a review," Review of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Studies, Springer, vol. 105(4), pages 393-418, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:9:p:975-:d:1646514. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.