IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i6p640-d1614788.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Difficult Decision of Using Biopesticides: A Comparative Case-Study Analysis Concerning the Adoption of Biopesticides in the Mediterranean Region

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Fusar Poli

    (University of Gastronomic Sciences, 12042 Bra, Italy)

  • José Miguel Campos

    (IRTA, Carretera de Balada, Km 1, 43870 Amposta, Tarragona, Spain)

  • María Teresa Martínez Ferrer

    (IRTA, Carretera de Balada, Km 1, 43870 Amposta, Tarragona, Spain)

  • Ridha Rahmouni

    (Citrus Technical Center, Nabeul 8099, Tunisia)

  • Souad Rouis

    (Center of Biotechnology of Sfax, Sfax 3018, Tunisia)

  • Zeynep Yurtkuran

    (Biyans Biological Products, 06690 Çankaya, Turkey)

  • Michele Filippo Fontefrancesco

    (University of Gastronomic Sciences, 12042 Bra, Italy
    Department of Sociology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 20123 Milan, Italy
    Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3HP, UK)

Abstract

The adoption of biopesticides in Mediterranean agriculture is shaped by environmental, economic, and socio-cultural factors. This study explores the push and pull factors influencing farmers’ decisions in Spain’s Ebro Delta, Tunisia’s Nabeul region, and Turkey’s Adana province. Through qualitative fieldwork and comparative analysis, key barriers to adoption are identified, including high costs, limited market availability, skepticism about efficacy, and reliance on conventional pesticides. However, this study also highlights opportunities driven by regulatory changes, increasing market demand for sustainable products, and the potential of biopesticides to improve ecological sustainability. The research follows a comparative case-study approach and was conducted between January and November 2024. The methodology included a literature review, two rounds of qualitative interviews with farmers, and thematic analysis to identify barriers and enabling factors, ensuring methodological rigor and cross-validation. Findings indicate that farmers’ professional ethos and economic conditions significantly limit biopesticide adoption. Perceived inefficacy, high production costs, and low profit margins reinforce reluctance. Spain struggles with skepticism, Tunisia faces economic and informational barriers, and Turkey’s reliance on traditional practices slows innovation. Despite these obstacles, key drivers facilitate adoption, including improved agricultural education, cooperative support, and increasing consumer demand for sustainable products. Legal frameworks, particularly the EU’s “Farm to Fork” strategy, play a crucial role, though top-down policies risk local resistance. This study outlines a model for biopesticide adoption based on seven key factors, with legal frameworks and farm structure emerging as primary drivers. Addressing economic and educational barriers is crucial for widespread adoption. By implementing targeted policies, Mediterranean agriculture can become a model for sustainable practices, balancing productivity and environmental stewardship.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Fusar Poli & José Miguel Campos & María Teresa Martínez Ferrer & Ridha Rahmouni & Souad Rouis & Zeynep Yurtkuran & Michele Filippo Fontefrancesco, 2025. "The Difficult Decision of Using Biopesticides: A Comparative Case-Study Analysis Concerning the Adoption of Biopesticides in the Mediterranean Region," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:640-:d:1614788
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/640/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/6/640/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dicle Dönmez & Musab A. Isak & Tolga İzgü & Özhan Şimşek, 2024. "Green Horizons: Navigating the Future of Agriculture through Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-20, April.
    2. Josh Pacewicz, 2022. "What Can You Do With a Single Case? How to Think About Ethnographic Case Selection Like a Historical Sociologist," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 51(3), pages 931-962, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ioan Prigoreanu & Bianca Antonela Ungureanu & George Ungureanu & Gabriela Ignat, 2024. "Analysis of Sustainable Energy and Environmental Policies in Agriculture in the EU Regarding the European Green Deal," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-31, December.
    2. Elsadig Omer & Dora Szlatenyi & Sándor Csenki & Jomana Alrwashdeh & Ivan Czako & Vince Láng, 2024. "Farming Practice Variability and Its Implications for Soil Health in Agriculture: A Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-27, November.
    3. Jun Fang, 2024. "The Culture of Censorship: State Intervention and Complicit Creativity in Global Film Production," American Sociological Review, , vol. 89(3), pages 488-517, June.
    4. Karla Terán-Samaniego & Jesús Martín Robles-Parra & Irasema Vargas-Arispuro & Miguel Ángel Martínez-Téllez & María Cristina Garza-Lagler & David Félix-Gurrlola & Mayra Lucía Maycotte-de la Peña & Juli, 2025. "Agroecology and Sustainable Agriculture: Conceptual Challenges and Opportunities—A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-21, February.
    5. Ruppel, Emily H., 2024. "Therapeutic management in the low-wage workplace," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 352(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:6:p:640-:d:1614788. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.