IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v15y2025i3p288-d1579255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Stacking Ensemble Learning and 1D-CNN Models for Predicting Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Stellera chamaejasme from Hyperspectral Reflectance Measurements

Author

Listed:
  • Xiaoyu Li

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Yongmei Liu

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Huaiyu Wang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Xingzhi Dong

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Lei Wang

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi’an 710127, China)

  • Yongqing Long

    (College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Northwest University, Xi’an 710127, China
    Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Earth Surface System and Environmental Carrying Capacity, Xi’an 710127, China)

Abstract

Stellera chamaejasme , a toxic invasive species widespread in degraded alpine grasslands, Qinghai Province, causes a significant threat to the local ecological balance. Accurate monitoring of the leaf chlorophyll content is essential for preventing its expansion over large areas. This study presents an optimal approach by integrating hierarchical dimensionality reduction, stacking ensemble learning, and 1D-CNN models to estimate leaf chlorophyll content in S. chamaejasme using hyperspectral reflectance data. Field spectrometry analysis demonstrates that the combination of Pearson correlation, first derivative, and SPA algorithms can efficiently select the most chlorophyll-sensitive wavelengths, red-edge parameters, and spectral indices related to S. chamaejasme leaves. The stacking ensemble model outperforms the 1D-CNN model in predicting leaf chlorophyll content of S. chamaejasme over the whole growth stage, while the 1D-CNN excels at prediction in each individual growth stage. Comparatively, the 1D-CNN model achieved higher accuracy (R 2 > 0.5) in all five growth stages, with optimal performance during the flower bud stage (R 2 = 0.787, RMSE = 2.476). This study underscores the potential of combining feature spectra selection with machine learning and deep learning models to monitor S. chamaejasme growth, offering valuable insights for invasive species control and ecological management.

Suggested Citation

  • Xiaoyu Li & Yongmei Liu & Huaiyu Wang & Xingzhi Dong & Lei Wang & Yongqing Long, 2025. "Comparing Stacking Ensemble Learning and 1D-CNN Models for Predicting Leaf Chlorophyll Content in Stellera chamaejasme from Hyperspectral Reflectance Measurements," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-18, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:288-:d:1579255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/288/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/15/3/288/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wisnowski, James W. & Montgomery, Douglas C. & Simpson, James R., 2001. "A Comparative analysis of multiple outlier detection procedures in the linear regression model," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 351-382, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marco Riani & Anthony C. Atkinson & Andrea Cerioli, 2009. "Finding an unknown number of multivariate outliers," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 71(2), pages 447-466, April.
    2. Atozou, Baoubadi & Tamini, Lota D. & Bergeronm, Stephane & Doyon, Maurice, 2020. "Factors Explaining the Hypothetical Bias: How to Improve Models for Meta-Analyses," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 45(2), March.
    3. Sung-Soo Kim & Sung Park & W. J. Krzanowski, 2008. "Simultaneous variable selection and outlier identification in linear regression using the mean-shift outlier model," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 283-291.
    4. Alexander A. Aduenko & Anastasia P. Motrenko & Vadim V. Strijov, 2018. "Object selection in credit scoring using covariance matrix of parameters estimations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 3-21, January.
    5. Agrell, Per J. & Niknazar, Pooria, 2014. "Structural and behavioral robustness in applied best-practice regulation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 48(1), pages 89-103.
    6. Atif Ali & Theodore W. Koch & Timothy A. Volk & Robert W. Malmsheimer & Mark H. Eisenbies & Danielle Kloster & Tristan R. Brown & Nehan Naim & Obste Therasme, 2022. "The Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Electricity Production in New York State from Distributed Solar Photovoltaic Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, October.
    7. P. Angelopoulos & C. Koukouvinos, 2008. "Detecting active effects in unreplicated designs," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 277-281.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:3:p:288-:d:1579255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.