Author
Listed:
- Andualem Shiferaw
(School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Girma Birru
(Agricutural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Tsegaye Tadesse
(School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Brian Wardlow
(School of Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Tala Awada
(Agricultural Research Division, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Virginia Jin
(Agricutural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Marty Schmer
(Agricutural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Ariel Freidenreich
(Agricutural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
- Javed Iqbal
(Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA)
Abstract
Cover crops (CCs) are widely recognized for their numerous benefits, including enhancing soil health, mitigating erosion, and promoting nutrient cycling, among many others. However, their outcomes vary significantly depending on site-specific biophysical conditions and agronomic management practices. This study investigates the geographic variations in cover crop outcomes across Nebraska, focusing on three critical management factors: seeding rate, termination timing, and termination-to-corn planting intervals. Using Decision Support System for Agrotechnology Transfer (DSSAT) simulations, we evaluated the effects of these practices on cover crop biomass, growth stages, and subsequent corn yield across seven sites. The results revealed that corn yield remained resilient across all sites, with no statistically significant differences ( p > 0.05) across termination timings, seeding rates, or termination-to-planting intervals. A CC seeding rate analysis showed that biomass tended to increase with higher seeding densities, particularly from 200 to 250 plants m −2 , but the gains diminished beyond that, and few pairwise comparisons reached statistical significance. Termination timing had a significant effect on biomass and growth stages, with delayed termination resulting in greater biomass accumulation and advanced phenological development (e.g., Zadoks > 45), which may complicate termination efficacy. Increasing termination-to-planting intervals led to reduced biomass due to shorter growing periods, though these reductions were not associated with significant corn yield penalties. This study highlights the importance of tailoring CC management strategies to local environmental conditions and agronomic objectives. By addressing these site-specific factors, the findings offer actionable insights for farmers and land managers to optimize both ecological benefits and productivity in Nebraska’s no-till systems.
Suggested Citation
Andualem Shiferaw & Girma Birru & Tsegaye Tadesse & Brian Wardlow & Tala Awada & Virginia Jin & Marty Schmer & Ariel Freidenreich & Javed Iqbal, 2025.
"Geographical Variation in Cover Crop Management and Outcomes in Continuous Corn Farming System in Nebraska,"
Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-25, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1776-:d:1727673
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:15:y:2025:i:16:p:1776-:d:1727673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.