IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v13y2023i3p626-d1089074.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biological Control Efficacy of Indigenous Antagonistic Bacteria Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Cabbage Grown in Biofumigated Soil against Pythium aphanidermatum Damping-Off of Cucumber

Author

Listed:
  • Dhuha Sulaiman Salim Al-Daghari

    (Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi

    (Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Issa Hashil Al-Mahmooli

    (Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Rhonda Janke

    (Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman)

  • Rethinasamy Velazhahan

    (Department of Plant Sciences, College of Agricultural and Marine Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Al-Khoud, Muscat 123, Oman)

Abstract

Soil biofumigation is a widely used farming practice for soil-borne disease management in vegetable crops. Soil biofumigation is the practice of the incorporation of fresh plant materials from the members of the Brassicaceae family into the soil which release antimicrobial volatile organic compounds (VOCs), namely glucosinolates and their hydrolysis products. However, the VOCs may affect non-target beneficial soil biota including microbial biocontrol agents (MBAs) due to their broad-spectrum toxicity. In this study, native antagonistic rhizobacteria were isolated from cabbage plants grown in biofumigated fields and their potential in the management of Pythium aphanidermatum cucumber damping-off was evaluated with and also without biofumigation using cabbage leaf residue. A total of 20 morphologically distinct, culturable bacterial strains were recovered from the rhizosphere soil of cabbage cultivated in a biofumigated field, with the largest fraction of the isolates belonging to the genus Bacillus . The other bacterial genera isolated were Pseudomonas , Serratia , Stenotrophomonas, Microbacterium and Priestia . Of the 20 bacterial isolates, Pseudomonas aeruginosa B1-SQU, Pseudomonas indica B2-SQU, Serratia marcescens B3-SQU and Pseudomonas brenneri B4-SQU exhibited inhibitory activity against P. aphanidermatum in a co-culture assay. The deformation and shrinkage of P. aphanidermatum hyphae due to diffusible antimicrobial compounds from these bacterial strains were witnessed through scanning electron microscopy. A biofilm was formed by these bacterial strains in vitro and they exhibited compatibility with each other; however, they had no significant plant growth promotion effect on cucumber. These bacterial strains significantly reduced damping-off in cucumber under greenhouse conditions when applied to soil singly, but failed to show a significant effect when combined with biofumigation treatment, though the bacterial population in the soil was maintained at higher levels. Soil biofumigation alone was also not effective in suppressing the damping-off of cucumber. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis revealed that 1-butanol, n-butyl butyrate and butyl acetate were the predominant VOCs in the soil amended with cabbage leaf residue. The results suggest that soil biofumigation with cabbage leaf residue has no significant effect on P. aphanidermatum under high inoculum levels; furthermore, it affects the efficiency of the bacterial antagonists in controlling damping-off in cucumber.

Suggested Citation

  • Dhuha Sulaiman Salim Al-Daghari & Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi & Issa Hashil Al-Mahmooli & Rhonda Janke & Rethinasamy Velazhahan, 2023. "Biological Control Efficacy of Indigenous Antagonistic Bacteria Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Cabbage Grown in Biofumigated Soil against Pythium aphanidermatum Damping-Off of Cucumber," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:626-:d:1089074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/626/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/13/3/626/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mads Albertsen & Søren M Karst & Anja S Ziegler & Rasmus H Kirkegaard & Per H Nielsen, 2015. "Back to Basics – The Influence of DNA Extraction and Primer Choice on Phylogenetic Analysis of Activated Sludge Communities," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(7), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Milan Panth & Samuel C. Hassler & Fulya Baysal-Gurel, 2020. "Methods for Management of Soilborne Diseases in Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Amanda Sörensen Ristinmaa & Albert Tafur Rangel & Alexander Idström & Sebastian Valenzuela & Eduard J. Kerkhoven & Phillip B. Pope & Merima Hasani & Johan Larsbrink, 2023. "Resin acids play key roles in shaping microbial communities during degradation of spruce bark," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    2. Gorkem Sulu & Ilknur Polat & Hatice Filiz Boyaci & Aytul Yildirim & Emine Gümrükcü, 2022. "Screening and validation of three molecular markers for disease resistance in eggplant," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 83-92.
    3. Kun Wang & Yinli Bi & Jiayu Zhang & Shaopeng Ma, 2022. "AMF Inoculum Enhances Crop Yields of Zea mays L. ‘Chenghai No. 618’ and Glycine max L. ‘Zhonghuang No. 17’ without Disturbing Native Fugal Communities in Coal Mine Dump," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Milan Panth & Anthony Witcher & Fulya Baysal-Gurel, 2021. "Response of Cover Crops to Phytopythium vexans , Phytophthora nicotianae, and Rhizoctonia solani , Major Soilborne Pathogens of Woody Ornamentals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Silvia Traversari & Sonia Cacini & Angelica Galieni & Beatrice Nesi & Nicola Nicastro & Catello Pane, 2021. "Precision Agriculture Digital Technologies for Sustainable Fungal Disease Management of Ornamental Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Anissa Poleatewich & Isobel Michaud & Brian Jackson & Matthew Krause & Liza DeGenring, 2022. "The Effect of Peat Moss Amended with Three Engineered Wood Substrate Components on Suppression of Damping-Off Caused by Rhizoctonia solani," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Minh Nguyen Quang & Tim Rogers & Jan Hofman & Ana B Lanham, 2019. "New framework for automated article selection applied to a literature review of Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-42, May.
    8. Domingo Cesar Carrascal-Hernández & Edwin Flórez-López & Yeimmy Peralta-Ruiz & Clemencia Chaves-López & Carlos David Grande-Tovar, 2022. "Eco-Friendly Biocontrol Strategies of Alternaria Phytopathogen Fungus: A Focus on Gene-Editing Techniques," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    9. Erhan Erdel & Uğur Şimşek & Tuba Genç Kesimci, 2023. "Effects of Fungi on Soil Organic Carbon and Soil Enzyme Activity under Agricultural and Pasture Land of Eastern Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    10. Sebastian Soppelsa & Luisa Maria Manici & Francesco Caputo & Massimo Zago & Markus Kelderer, 2021. "Locally Available Organic Waste for Counteracting Strawberry Decline in a Mountain Specialized Cropping Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:13:y:2023:i:3:p:626-:d:1089074. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.