IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v14y2024i12p2158-d1531022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Pulsed Electric Fields on the Elimination of Fusarium oxysporum in Greenhouse Soil

Author

Listed:
  • Jie Chen

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
    School of Intelligence Engineering, Jinzhong College of Information, Jinzhong 030800, China
    Shanxi Key Laboratory of Dryland Farm Machinery Key Technology and Equipment, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Yingjian Sun

    (College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Qingliang Cui

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China
    Shanxi Key Laboratory of Dryland Farm Machinery Key Technology and Equipment, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Xiaojuan Hao

    (College of Plant Protection, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Zhenyu Liu

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

  • Guang Li

    (College of Agricultural Engineering, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China)

Abstract

In greenhouses, high humidity, low light, and inadequate ventilation conditions, along with continuous and high-density planting, promote the proliferation of soilborne pathogens. Among these pathogens, Fusarium oxysporum Schltdl ( F. oxysporum ) is a notably challenging one, causing root rot of tomato plants in greenhouse cultivation. To address this issue, this study applied a pulsed electric field (PEF) to target the elimination of F. oxysporum in suspension and soil media. Initially, PEF parameters were systematically explored in suspensions to determine the effective ranges for the elimination of F. oxysporum . The results revealed that the effective ranges for achieving the desired microbial reduction were an electric field strength (EFS) between 5–15 kV·cm −1 , a pulse number within the range of 100–500, and a pulse width of 10–20 µs. Subsequently, the impact of soil moisture content, soil bulk density, and soil type on soil dielectric breakdown field strength was analyzed within the range from previous results. Based on these findings, the soil experiments were conducted with parameters designed to prevent dielectric breakdown. Specifically, for sampling soil with a moisture content of 16.2% and a bulk density of 1.31 g·cm −3 , the maximum effective application of electric field strength was 9.5 kV·cm −1 , accompanied by 1000 pulses and a pulse width of 20 µs. Finally, building on these results, soil samples were sterilized within a parameter range that spanned an electric field strength of 5–9.5 kV·cm −1 , a pulse number between 100–500, and a pulse width of 10–20 µs. Response surface methodology (RSM) analysis further identified the optimal parameter combination: an electric field strength of 8.2 kV·cm −1 , 306 pulses, and a pulse width of 15 µs, resulting in an average lethal rate of 76.16% for F. oxysporum sterilization in soil. These findings suggest the potential use of PEF against F. oxysporum and other pathogens in greenhouse soils, and provide theoretical foundations for further experiments, thereby contributing to the sustainable advancement of greenhouse agriculture.

Suggested Citation

  • Jie Chen & Yingjian Sun & Qingliang Cui & Xiaojuan Hao & Zhenyu Liu & Guang Li, 2024. "Effects of Pulsed Electric Fields on the Elimination of Fusarium oxysporum in Greenhouse Soil," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-34, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2158-:d:1531022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2158/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/14/12/2158/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milan Panth & Samuel C. Hassler & Fulya Baysal-Gurel, 2020. "Methods for Management of Soilborne Diseases in Crop Production," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Viola Papini & Angelo Meloni & Susanna Pecchia, 2025. "Development of a Duplex PCR-NALFIA Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of Macrophomina phaseolina and Verticillium dahliae Causal Agents of Crown and Root Rot of Strawberry," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Gorkem Sulu & Ilknur Polat & Hatice Filiz Boyaci & Aytul Yildirim & Emine Gümrükcü, 2022. "Screening and validation of three molecular markers for disease resistance in eggplant," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 58(2), pages 83-92.
    3. Kun Wang & Yinli Bi & Jiayu Zhang & Shaopeng Ma, 2022. "AMF Inoculum Enhances Crop Yields of Zea mays L. ‘Chenghai No. 618’ and Glycine max L. ‘Zhonghuang No. 17’ without Disturbing Native Fugal Communities in Coal Mine Dump," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Milan Panth & Anthony Witcher & Fulya Baysal-Gurel, 2021. "Response of Cover Crops to Phytopythium vexans , Phytophthora nicotianae, and Rhizoctonia solani , Major Soilborne Pathogens of Woody Ornamentals," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Dhuha Sulaiman Salim Al-Daghari & Abdullah Mohammed Al-Sadi & Issa Hashil Al-Mahmooli & Rhonda Janke & Rethinasamy Velazhahan, 2023. "Biological Control Efficacy of Indigenous Antagonistic Bacteria Isolated from the Rhizosphere of Cabbage Grown in Biofumigated Soil against Pythium aphanidermatum Damping-Off of Cucumber," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Silvia Traversari & Sonia Cacini & Angelica Galieni & Beatrice Nesi & Nicola Nicastro & Catello Pane, 2021. "Precision Agriculture Digital Technologies for Sustainable Fungal Disease Management of Ornamental Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-22, March.
    7. Anissa Poleatewich & Isobel Michaud & Brian Jackson & Matthew Krause & Liza DeGenring, 2022. "The Effect of Peat Moss Amended with Three Engineered Wood Substrate Components on Suppression of Damping-Off Caused by Rhizoctonia solani," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-15, December.
    8. Pannapa Khiawnoi & Sor Sirichai Nakudom & Pinrudee Noobutr & Uthorn Kaewzang, 2025. "Empowering Communities: The Strategic Role of Community Enterprise Entrepreneurs in Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-17, June.
    9. Domingo Cesar Carrascal-Hernández & Edwin Flórez-López & Yeimmy Peralta-Ruiz & Clemencia Chaves-López & Carlos David Grande-Tovar, 2022. "Eco-Friendly Biocontrol Strategies of Alternaria Phytopathogen Fungus: A Focus on Gene-Editing Techniques," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, October.
    10. Erhan Erdel & Uğur Şimşek & Tuba Genç Kesimci, 2023. "Effects of Fungi on Soil Organic Carbon and Soil Enzyme Activity under Agricultural and Pasture Land of Eastern Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
    11. Sebastian Soppelsa & Luisa Maria Manici & Francesco Caputo & Massimo Zago & Markus Kelderer, 2021. "Locally Available Organic Waste for Counteracting Strawberry Decline in a Mountain Specialized Cropping Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Jien Zhou & Xueyan Zhang & Zheng Qu & Chenchen Zhang & Feng Wang & Tongguo Gao & Yanpo Yao & Junfeng Liang, 2024. "Progress in Research on Prevention and Control of Crop Fungal Diseases in the Context of Climate Change," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:14:y:2024:i:12:p:2158-:d:1531022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.