IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1436-d911935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Yield and Sugar Traits in Saccharum spp. Hybrids

Author

Listed:
  • Md. S. Islam

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA)

  • Per McCord

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA
    Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA)

  • Quentin D. Read

    (Southeast Area, USDA-ARS, Raleigh, NC 38776, USA)

  • Lifang Qin

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA
    Guangxi Key Laboratory for Sugarcane Biology & State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Agro Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Alexander E. Lipka

    (Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61820, USA)

  • Sushma Sood

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA)

  • James Todd

    (Sugarcane Research, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA 70360, USA)

  • Marcus Olatoye

    (Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, USDA ARS, Prosser, WA 97331, USA)

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has been demonstrated to enhance the selection process in breeding programs. The objectives of this study were to experimentally evaluate different GS methods in sugarcane hybrids and to determine the prospect of GS in future breeding approaches. Using sugar and yield-related trait data from 432 sugarcane clones and 10,435 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a study was conducted using seven different GS models. While fivefold cross-validated prediction accuracy differed by trait and by crop cycle, there were only small differences in prediction accuracy among the different models. Prediction accuracy was on average 0.20 across all traits and crop cycles for all tested models. Utilizing a trait-assisted GS model, we could effectively predict the fivefold cross-validated genomic estimated breeding value of ratoon crops using both SNPs and trait values from the plant cane crop. We found that the plateau of prediction accuracy could be achieved with 4000 to 5000 SNPs. Prediction accuracy did not decline with decreasing size of the training population until it was reduced below 60% (259) to 80% (346) of the original number of clones. Our findings suggest that GS is possibly a new direction for improving sugar and yield-related traits in sugarcane.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. S. Islam & Per McCord & Quentin D. Read & Lifang Qin & Alexander E. Lipka & Sushma Sood & James Todd & Marcus Olatoye, 2022. "Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Yield and Sugar Traits in Saccharum spp. Hybrids," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1436-:d:911935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew H. Paterson & John E. Bowers & Rémy Bruggmann & Inna Dubchak & Jane Grimwood & Heidrun Gundlach & Georg Haberer & Uffe Hellsten & Therese Mitros & Alexander Poliakov & Jeremy Schmutz & Manuel S, 2009. "The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7229), pages 551-556, January.
    2. Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran, 2016. "Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Nicolas Heslot & Jessica Rutkoski & Jesse Poland & Jean-Luc Jannink & Mark E Sorrells, 2013. "Impact of Marker Ascertainment Bias on Genomic Selection Accuracy and Estimates of Genetic Diversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    4. Jennifer Spindel & Hasina Begum & Deniz Akdemir & Parminder Virk & Bertrand Collard & Edilberto Redoña & Gary Atlin & Jean-Luc Jannink & Susan R McCouch, 2015. "Genomic Selection and Association Mapping in Rice (Oryza sativa): Effect of Trait Genetic Architecture, Training Population Composition, Marker Number and Statistical Model on Accuracy of Rice Genomic," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & Francisco Hernández-Rosas & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval & Joel Velasco-Velasco & Noé Aguilar Rivera, 2019. "What Has Been the Focus of Sugarcane Research? A Bibliometric Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Martina Hančová & Andrej Gajdoš & Jozef Hanč & Gabriela Vozáriková, 2021. "Estimating variances in time series kriging using convex optimization and empirical BLUPs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1899-1938, August.
    3. Charles‐Elie Rabier & Simona Grusea, 2021. "Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1001-1026, August.
    4. Taikui Zhang & Weichen Huang & Lin Zhang & De-Zhu Li & Ji Qi & Hong Ma, 2024. "Phylogenomic profiles of whole-genome duplications in Poaceae and landscape of differential duplicate retention and losses among major Poaceae lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Veronika DUMALASOVÁ & Leona SVOBODOVÁ & Alena HANZALOVÁ, 2012. "Differentially expressed gene transcripts in wheat and barley leaves upon leaf spot infection," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 108-119.
    6. Mathias Ruben Gemmer & Chris Richter & Yong Jiang & Thomas Schmutzer & Manish L Raorane & Björn Junker & Klaus Pillen & Andreas Maurer, 2020. "Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Peng Xie & Sanyuan Tang & Chengxuan Chen & Huili Zhang & Feifei Yu & Chao Li & Huimin Wei & Yi Sui & Chuanyin Wu & Xianmin Diao & Yaorong Wu & Qi Xie, 2022. "Natural variation in Glume Coverage 1 causes naked grains in sorghum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Charles-Elie Rabier & Philippe Barre & Torben Asp & Gilles Charmet & Brigitte Mangin, 2016. "On the Accuracy of Genomic Selection," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Reyna Persa & Martin Grondona & Diego Jarquin, 2021. "Development of a Genomic Prediction Pipeline for Maintaining Comparable Sample Sizes in Training and Testing Sets across Prediction Schemes Accounting for the Genotype-by-Environment Interaction," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-17, September.
    10. Aditi Bhandari & Jérôme Bartholomé & Tuong-Vi Cao-Hamadoun & Nilima Kumari & Julien Frouin & Arvind Kumar & Nourollah Ahmadi, 2019. "Selection of trait-specific markers and multi-environment models improve genomic predictive ability in rice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(5), pages 1-21, May.
    11. Liang Ma & Ke-Wei Liu & Zhen Li & Yu-Yun Hsiao & Yiying Qi & Tao Fu & Guang-Da Tang & Diyang Zhang & Wei-Hong Sun & Ding-Kun Liu & Yuanyuan Li & Gui-Zhen Chen & Xue-Die Liu & Xing-Yu Liao & Yu-Ting Ji, 2023. "Diploid and tetraploid genomes of Acorus and the evolution of monocots," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-18, December.
    12. Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade & Massaine Bandeira e Sousa & Eder Jorge Oliveira & Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende & Camila Ferreira Azevedo, 2019. "Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Gaotian Zhang & Nicole M. Roberto & Daehan Lee & Steffen R. Hahnel & Erik C. Andersen, 2022. "The impact of species-wide gene expression variation on Caenorhabditis elegans complex traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Shin-Fu Tsai & Chih-Chien Shen & Chen-Tuo Liao, 2021. "Bayesian Optimization Approaches for Identifying the Best Genotype from a Candidate Population," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(4), pages 519-537, December.
    15. Yong-Pei Wu & Yu-Chi Chang & Su-Chen Kuo & Dah-Jing Liao & Ting-Yu Shen & Hsin-I Kuo & Sheng-Wen Wang & Yu-Chien Tseng, 2023. "The Breeding of Waxy Sorghum Using Traditional Three-Line Method and Marker-Assisted Selection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, October.
    16. Shiori Yabe & Masanori Yamasaki & Kaworu Ebana & Takeshi Hayashi & Hiroyoshi Iwata, 2016. "Island-Model Genomic Selection for Long-Term Genetic Improvement of Autogamous Crops," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(4), pages 1-21, April.
    17. Prabin Bajgain & James A. Anderson, 2021. "Multi-Allelic Haplotype-Based Association Analysis Identifies Genomic Regions Controlling Domestication Traits in Intermediate Wheatgrass," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    18. Hongzeng Fan & Jibin Wang & Songhao Shen & Mingchong Yang & Suli Li & Bihong Feng & Ruimin Zhong & Chongjian Ma & Jihong Wang & Ruohan Xie & Lingqiang Wang, 2022. "High-Throughput Phenotyping of Cross-Sectional Morphology to Assess Stalk Mechanical Properties in Sorghum," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    19. Marco Scutari & Ian Mackay & David Balding, 2016. "Using Genetic Distance to Infer the Accuracy of Genomic Prediction," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(9), pages 1-19, September.
    20. Laviola, Bruno Galvêas & Rodrigues, Erina Vitório & Teodoro, Paulo Eduardo & Peixoto, Leonardo de Azevedo & Bhering, Leonardo Lopes, 2017. "Biometric and biotechnology strategies in Jatropha genetic breeding for biodiesel production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 894-904.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1436-:d:911935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.