IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i9p1436-d911935.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Yield and Sugar Traits in Saccharum spp. Hybrids

Author

Listed:
  • Md. S. Islam

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA)

  • Per McCord

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA
    Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center, Washington State University, Prosser, WA 99350, USA)

  • Quentin D. Read

    (Southeast Area, USDA-ARS, Raleigh, NC 38776, USA)

  • Lifang Qin

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA
    Guangxi Key Laboratory for Sugarcane Biology & State Key Laboratory for Conservation and Utilization of Agro Bioresources, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China)

  • Alexander E. Lipka

    (Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, IL 61820, USA)

  • Sushma Sood

    (Sugarcane Field Station, USDA-ARS, Canal Point, FL 33834, USA)

  • James Todd

    (Sugarcane Research, USDA-ARS, Houma, LA 70360, USA)

  • Marcus Olatoye

    (Forage Seed and Cereal Research Unit, USDA ARS, Prosser, WA 97331, USA)

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) has been demonstrated to enhance the selection process in breeding programs. The objectives of this study were to experimentally evaluate different GS methods in sugarcane hybrids and to determine the prospect of GS in future breeding approaches. Using sugar and yield-related trait data from 432 sugarcane clones and 10,435 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), a study was conducted using seven different GS models. While fivefold cross-validated prediction accuracy differed by trait and by crop cycle, there were only small differences in prediction accuracy among the different models. Prediction accuracy was on average 0.20 across all traits and crop cycles for all tested models. Utilizing a trait-assisted GS model, we could effectively predict the fivefold cross-validated genomic estimated breeding value of ratoon crops using both SNPs and trait values from the plant cane crop. We found that the plateau of prediction accuracy could be achieved with 4000 to 5000 SNPs. Prediction accuracy did not decline with decreasing size of the training population until it was reduced below 60% (259) to 80% (346) of the original number of clones. Our findings suggest that GS is possibly a new direction for improving sugar and yield-related traits in sugarcane.

Suggested Citation

  • Md. S. Islam & Per McCord & Quentin D. Read & Lifang Qin & Alexander E. Lipka & Sushma Sood & James Todd & Marcus Olatoye, 2022. "Accuracy of Genomic Prediction of Yield and Sugar Traits in Saccharum spp. Hybrids," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1436-:d:911935
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1436/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/9/1436/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew H. Paterson & John E. Bowers & Rémy Bruggmann & Inna Dubchak & Jane Grimwood & Heidrun Gundlach & Georg Haberer & Uffe Hellsten & Therese Mitros & Alexander Poliakov & Jeremy Schmutz & Manuel S, 2009. "The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses," Nature, Nature, vol. 457(7229), pages 551-556, January.
    2. Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran, 2016. "Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-15, June.
    3. Nicolas Heslot & Jessica Rutkoski & Jesse Poland & Jean-Luc Jannink & Mark E Sorrells, 2013. "Impact of Marker Ascertainment Bias on Genomic Selection Accuracy and Estimates of Genetic Diversity," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-8, September.
    4. Jennifer Spindel & Hasina Begum & Deniz Akdemir & Parminder Virk & Bertrand Collard & Edilberto Redoña & Gary Atlin & Jean-Luc Jannink & Susan R McCouch, 2015. "Genomic Selection and Association Mapping in Rice (Oryza sativa): Effect of Trait Genetic Architecture, Training Population Composition, Marker Number and Statistical Model on Accuracy of Rice Genomic," PLOS Genetics, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(2), pages 1-25, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Katia A. Figueroa-Rodríguez & Francisco Hernández-Rosas & Benjamín Figueroa-Sandoval & Joel Velasco-Velasco & Noé Aguilar Rivera, 2019. "What Has Been the Focus of Sugarcane Research? A Bibliometric Overview," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Martina Hančová & Andrej Gajdoš & Jozef Hanč & Gabriela Vozáriková, 2021. "Estimating variances in time series kriging using convex optimization and empirical BLUPs," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(4), pages 1899-1938, August.
    3. Charles‐Elie Rabier & Simona Grusea, 2021. "Prediction in high‐dimensional linear models and application to genomic selection under imperfect linkage disequilibrium," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series C, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 70(4), pages 1001-1026, August.
    4. Taikui Zhang & Weichen Huang & Lin Zhang & De-Zhu Li & Ji Qi & Hong Ma, 2024. "Phylogenomic profiles of whole-genome duplications in Poaceae and landscape of differential duplicate retention and losses among major Poaceae lineages," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-27, December.
    5. Peng Xie & Sanyuan Tang & Chengxuan Chen & Huili Zhang & Feifei Yu & Chao Li & Huimin Wei & Yi Sui & Chuanyin Wu & Xianmin Diao & Yaorong Wu & Qi Xie, 2022. "Natural variation in Glume Coverage 1 causes naked grains in sorghum," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. repec:plo:pone00:0243666 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Luciano Rogério Braatz de Andrade & Massaine Bandeira e Sousa & Eder Jorge Oliveira & Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende & Camila Ferreira Azevedo, 2019. "Cassava yield traits predicted by genomic selection methods," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, November.
    8. Haifei Hu & Junliang Zhao & William J. W. Thomas & Jacqueline Batley & David Edwards, 2025. "The role of pangenomics in orphan crop improvement," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-9, December.
    9. Gaotian Zhang & Nicole M. Roberto & Daehan Lee & Steffen R. Hahnel & Erik C. Andersen, 2022. "The impact of species-wide gene expression variation on Caenorhabditis elegans complex traits," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Yong-Pei Wu & Yu-Chi Chang & Su-Chen Kuo & Dah-Jing Liao & Ting-Yu Shen & Hsin-I Kuo & Sheng-Wen Wang & Yu-Chien Tseng, 2023. "The Breeding of Waxy Sorghum Using Traditional Three-Line Method and Marker-Assisted Selection," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, October.
    11. Prabin Bajgain & James A. Anderson, 2021. "Multi-Allelic Haplotype-Based Association Analysis Identifies Genomic Regions Controlling Domestication Traits in Intermediate Wheatgrass," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-15, July.
    12. Hongzeng Fan & Jibin Wang & Songhao Shen & Mingchong Yang & Suli Li & Bihong Feng & Ruimin Zhong & Chongjian Ma & Jihong Wang & Ruohan Xie & Lingqiang Wang, 2022. "High-Throughput Phenotyping of Cross-Sectional Morphology to Assess Stalk Mechanical Properties in Sorghum," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-13, October.
    13. Muhammad Junaid Zaghum & Kashir Ali & Sheng Teng, 2022. "Integrated Genetic and Omics Approaches for the Regulation of Nutritional Activities in Rice ( Oryza sativa L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-17, October.
    14. Julien Frouin & Axel Labeyrie & Arnaud Boisnard & Gian Attilio Sacchi & Nourollah Ahmadi, 2019. "Genomic prediction offers the most effective marker assisted breeding approach for ability to prevent arsenic accumulation in rice grains," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.
    15. Yusuke Toda & Hitomi Wakatsuki & Toru Aoike & Hiromi Kajiya-Kanegae & Masanori Yamasaki & Takuma Yoshioka & Kaworu Ebana & Takeshi Hayashi & Hiroshi Nakagawa & Toshihiro Hasegawa & Hiroyoshi Iwata, 2020. "Predicting biomass of rice with intermediate traits: Modeling method combining crop growth models and genomic prediction models," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, June.
    16. Andrej Kuritzin & Tabea Kischka & Jürgen Schmitz & Gennady Churakov, 2016. "Incomplete Lineage Sorting and Hybridization Statistics for Large-Scale Retroposon Insertion Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-20, March.
    17. Theivanayagam Maharajan & Thumadath Palayullaparambil Ajeesh Krishna & Neenthamadathil Mohandas Krishnakumar & Mani Vetriventhan & Himabindu Kudapa & Stanislaus Antony Ceasar, 2024. "Role of Genome Sequences of Major and Minor Millets in Strengthening Food and Nutritional Security for Future Generations," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-28, April.
    18. Cécile Grenier & Tuong-Vi Cao & Yolima Ospina & Constanza Quintero & Marc Henri Châtel & Joe Tohme & Brigitte Courtois & Nourollah Ahmadi, 2015. "Accuracy of Genomic Selection in a Rice Synthetic Population Developed for Recurrent Selection Breeding," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(8), pages 1-25, August.
    19. Ibrahim ElBasyoni & Mohamed Saadalla & Stephen Baenziger & Harold Bockelman & Sabah Morsy, 2017. "Cell Membrane Stability and Association Mapping for Drought and Heat Tolerance in a Worldwide Wheat Collection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-16, September.
    20. Veronika DUMALASOVÁ & Leona SVOBODOVÁ & Alena HANZALOVÁ, 2012. "Differentially expressed gene transcripts in wheat and barley leaves upon leaf spot infection," Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 48(3), pages 108-119.
    21. Mathias Ruben Gemmer & Chris Richter & Yong Jiang & Thomas Schmutzer & Manish L Raorane & Björn Junker & Klaus Pillen & Andreas Maurer, 2020. "Can metabolic prediction be an alternative to genomic prediction in barley?," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:9:p:1436-:d:911935. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.