IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2022i7p951-d853059.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Friability of Maize Shoot ( Zea mays L.) in Relation to Cell Wall Composition and Physical Properties

Author

Listed:
  • Marie Berger

    (UR1268 BIA, INRAE, 44316 Nantes, France
    Limagrain Europe SAS, 36360 Saint-Beauzire, France
    IATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, L’institut Agro, Pl. Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France)

  • Marie-Françoise Devaux

    (UR1268 BIA, INRAE, 44316 Nantes, France)

  • Claire Mayer-Laigle

    (IATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, L’institut Agro, Pl. Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France)

  • Adrien Réau

    (IATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, L’institut Agro, Pl. Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France)

  • Benoit Delord

    (Limagrain Europe SAS, 36360 Saint-Beauzire, France)

  • Fabienne Guillon

    (UR1268 BIA, INRAE, 44316 Nantes, France)

  • Cécile Barron

    (IATE, University of Montpellier, INRAE, L’institut Agro, Pl. Pierre Viala, 34060 Montpellier, France)

Abstract

Maize ( Zea mays L.) is widely cultivated worldwide for food, feed, and fuel uses. Maize forage has become a valuable feed material, and there is much interest in characterizing its friability, as friability may shape feed value through its effect on ingestibility. The objective of this study was to characterize the friability of maize forage based on its milling behavior within a collection of inbred lines of maize. We proposed two friability indexes—Particle Size Reduction (PSR) and Energy Index—and evaluated their ability to discriminate 24 inbred maize lines differing in digestibility. Both the PSR Index and Energy Index effectively highlighted the variability in friability, which could vary by a factor of two regardless of index. These two friability indexes are based on two different milling technologies and therefore on different mechanical stresses inside the mills that could both inform on friability, but on different scales. In order to interpret the observed differences, we characterized the biomass at different scales, from phenotypic observation of the shoot to physical properties of the chopped maize, down to cell wall amount and composition. The friability assessed through these two indexes was mainly inter-correlated: the lower the milling energy, the more friable the fine particles produced. However, we also identified slight differences between the indexes that could be interpreted in relation to structural scale: while the Energy Index primarily informed friability at the cellular scale, the PSR Index also informed friability at the cell wall scale. This study provided key insight into the friability of maize forage and its relation to physical and fiber properties.

Suggested Citation

  • Marie Berger & Marie-Françoise Devaux & Claire Mayer-Laigle & Adrien Réau & Benoit Delord & Fabienne Guillon & Cécile Barron, 2022. "Friability of Maize Shoot ( Zea mays L.) in Relation to Cell Wall Composition and Physical Properties," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-21, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:951-:d:853059
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/951/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/7/951/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Georgiana Moiceanu & Gigel Paraschiv & Gheorghe Voicu & Mirela Dinca & Olivia Negoita & Mihai Chitoiu & Paula Tudor, 2019. "Energy Consumption at Size Reduction of Lignocellulose Biomass for Bioenergy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Andrzej Marczuk & Agata Blicharz-Kania & Petr A. Savinykh & Alexey Y. Isupov & Andrey V. Palichyn & Ilya I. Ivanov, 2019. "Studies of a Rotary–Centrifugal Grain Grinder Using a Multifactorial Experimental Design Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-11, September.
    2. Sławomir Francik & Adrian Knapczyk & Artur Knapczyk & Renata Francik, 2020. "Decision Support System for the Production of Miscanthus and Willow Briquettes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Adrian Knapczyk & Sławomir Francik & Marcin Jewiarz & Agnieszka Zawiślak & Renata Francik, 2020. "Thermal Treatment of Biomass: A Bibliometric Analysis—The Torrefaction Case," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, December.
    4. Marie-Noël Mansour & Thomas Lendormi & Nicolas Louka & Richard G. Maroun & Zeina Hobaika & Jean-Louis Lanoisellé, 2023. "Anaerobic Digestion of Poultry Droppings in Semi-Continuous Mode and Effect of Their Co-Digestion with Physico-Chemical Sludge on Methane Yield," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Areepak, Chitchanok & Jiradechakorn, Thitirat & Chuetor, Santi & Phalakornkule, Chantaraporn & Sriariyanun, Malinee & Raita, Marisa & Champreda, Verawat & Laosiripojana, Navadol, 2022. "Improvement of lignocellulosic pretreatment efficiency by combined chemo - Mechanical pretreatment for energy consumption reduction and biofuel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 1094-1102.
    6. Yue Zhang & Sigrid Kusch-Brandt & Shiyan Gu & Sonia Heaven, 2019. "Particle Size Distribution in Municipal Solid Waste Pre-Treated for Bioprocessing," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-24, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2022:i:7:p:951-:d:853059. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.