IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v12y2021i1p31-d712939.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of the Rapid Construction of a High-Quality Plough Layer Based on Woody Peat in a Newly Reclaimed Cultivated Land Area

Author

Listed:
  • Sicheng Zhang

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Rui Zhao

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Kening Wu

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
    Key Laboratory of Land Consolidation and Rehabilitation, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100035, China
    Technology Innovation Center of Land Engineering, Ministry of Natural Resources, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qin Huang

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Long Kang

    (School of Land Science and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

To implement the balance system of cultivated land in occupation and supplement and to adhere to the principle of “supplement the occupied cultivated land of high quality with the one bearing same quality”, in the thesis, a field experiment was conducted to study the effects of woody peat on soil physical, chemical, and biological properties of the plough layer and its crop yield. Furthermore, the correlation between soil indexes and crop yield under the best fertilization mode through the addition of the natural material of woody peat instead of lengthy cultivation of the plough layer to rapidly construct a high-quality plough layer and solve the practical problem that the natural endowment of newly reclaimed cultivated land is far less than the occupied high-quality cultivated land was explored. The land remediation project of Fuping County, Hebei Province, was taken as the experimental area, and the five most representative and effective datasets were selected and studied. The results demonstrated that the addition of woody peat and rotten straw could reduce soil particle size and bulk density and alleviate soil viscosity and acidification. An increase in soil organic matter, soil microbial biomass carbon (MBC), alkali-hydrolyzable nitrogen, available phosphorus, and available potassium and a decrease in the heavy metal content were also observed. The results indicated that the application of woody peat achieved the expected effect of the rapid construction of a high-quality plough layer. The best mode of fertilization was A2, which provided a good reference for the rapid construction of a high-quality plough layer in the future. The analysis of the correlation between soil indexes and crop yield illustrated that the organic matter content, soil available nutrients, and crop yield had a significant positive correlation; the organic matter content and soil available nutrients showed the same tendency, which suggests that soil organic matter content and soil fertility level are closely related and that soil fertility plays a decisive role in crop yield under the same external conditions. Woody peat exerted an eminent influence on the organic matter content and soil available nutrients to determine the change in crop yield, which provides a reliable basis for future research on land improvement projects to increase crop yield.

Suggested Citation

  • Sicheng Zhang & Rui Zhao & Kening Wu & Qin Huang & Long Kang, 2021. "Effects of the Rapid Construction of a High-Quality Plough Layer Based on Woody Peat in a Newly Reclaimed Cultivated Land Area," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:31-:d:712939
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/31/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/12/1/31/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farooq Shah & Wei Wu, 2019. "Soil and Crop Management Strategies to Ensure Higher Crop Productivity within Sustainable Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Ram Swaroop Meena & Sandeep Kumar & Rahul Datta & Rattan Lal & Vinod Vijayakumar & Martin Brtnicky & Mahaveer Prasad Sharma & Gulab Singh Yadav & Manoj Kumar Jhariya & Chetan Kumar Jangir & Shamina Im, 2020. "Impact of Agrochemicals on Soil Microbiota and Management: A Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-21, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karin Kauer & Sandra Pärnpuu & Liina Talgre & Viacheslav Eremeev & Anne Luik, 2021. "Soil Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Matter Increases in Organic Farming under Cover Cropping and Manure Addition," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, September.
    2. Manogna R. L. & Aswini Kumar Mishra, 2022. "Agricultural production efficiency of Indian states: Evidence from data envelopment analysis," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 27(4), pages 4244-4255, October.
    3. Zehra Ekin, 2019. "Integrated Use of Humic Acid and Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria to Ensure Higher Potato Productivity in Sustainable Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, June.
    4. Massamba Diop & Ngonidzashe Chirinda & Adnane Beniaich & Mohamed El Gharous & Khalil El Mejahed, 2022. "Soil and Water Conservation in Africa: State of Play and Potential Role in Tackling Soil Degradation and Building Soil Health in Agricultural Lands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-29, October.
    5. Subhan Danish & Muhammad Zafar-ul-Hye & Shah Fahad & Shah Saud & Martin Brtnicky & Tereza Hammerschmiedt & Rahul Datta, 2020. "Drought Stress Alleviation by ACC Deaminase Producing Achromobacter xylosoxidans and Enterobacter cloacae , with and without Timber Waste Biochar in Maize," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Purushothaman Chirakkuzhyil Abhilash, 2021. "Restoring the Unrestored: Strategies for Restoring Global Land during the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (UN-DER)," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Fazli Wahid & Shah Fahad & Subhan Danish & Muhammad Adnan & Zhen Yue & Shah Saud & Manzer H. Siddiqui & Martin Brtnicky & Tereza Hammerschmiedt & Rahul Datta, 2020. "Sustainable Management with Mycorrhizae and Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria for Enhanced Phosphorus Uptake in Calcareous Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-14, August.
    8. Li Tan & Bin Yang & Zhibin Xue & Zhanqi Wang, 2021. "Assessing Heavy Metal Contamination Risk in Soil and Water in the Core Water Source Area of the Middle Route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Tatyana Korshunova & Elena Kuzina & Svetlana Mukhamatdyarova & Yuliyana Sharipova & Milyausha Iskuzhina, 2023. "Promising Strains of Hydrocarbon-Oxidizing Pseudomonads with Herbicide Resistance and Plant Growth-Stimulating Properties for Bioremediation of Oil-Contaminated Agricultural Soils," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-21, May.
    10. Piotr Barbaś & Barbara Sawicka & Barbara Krochmal Marczak & Piotr Pszczółkowski, 2020. "Effect of Mechanical and Herbicide Treatments on Weed Densities and Biomass in Two Potato Cultivars," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-17, October.
    11. Mack, G. & Finger, R. & Ammann, J. & El Benni, N., 2023. "Modelling policies towards pesticide-free agricultural production systems," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    12. Belén López-Felices & José A. Aznar-Sánchez & Juan F. Velasco-Muñoz & María Piquer-Rodríguez, 2020. "Contribution of Irrigation Ponds to the Sustainability of Agriculture. A Review of Worldwide Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Qiao Liang & Kangwei Ma & Wenhao Liu, 2023. "The role of farmer cooperatives in promoting environmentally sustainable agricultural development in China: A review," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(3), pages 741-759, September.
    14. Dimitrios E. Alexakis, 2020. "Contaminated Land by Wildfire Effect on Ultramafic Soil and Associated Human Health and Ecological Risk," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, October.
    15. Parvender Sheoran & Arvind Kumar & Raman Sharma & Kailash Prajapat & Ashwani Kumar & Arijit Barman & R. Raju & Satyendra Kumar & Yousuf Jaffer Dar & Ranjay K. Singh & Satish Kumar Sanwal & Rajender Ku, 2021. "Quantitative Dissection of Salt Tolerance for Sustainable Wheat Production in Sodic Agro-Ecosystems through Farmers’ Participatory Approach: An Indian Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Elżbieta Patkowska, 2021. "Biostimulants Managed Fungal Phytopathogens and Enhanced Activity of Beneficial Microorganisms in Rhizosphere of Scorzonera ( Scorzonera hispanica L.)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-26, April.
    17. Jeong-Mi Do & Hee-Jin Kim & Sun-Young Shin & Seong-Im Park & Jin-Ju Kim & Ho-Sung Yoon, 2023. "OsHSP 17.9, a Small Heat Shock Protein, Confers Improved Productivity and Tolerance to High Temperature and Salinity in a Natural Paddy Field in Transgenic Rice Plants," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, April.
    18. Jun Gao & Muhammad Faheem & Xiang Yu, 2022. "Global Research on Contaminated Soil Remediation: A Bibliometric Network Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Mohammad Faizan & Pravej Alam & Vishnu D. Rajput & Ahmad Faraz & Shadma Afzal & S. Maqbool Ahmed & Fang-Yuan Yu & Tatiana Minkina & Shamsul Hayat, 2023. "Nanoparticle Mediated Plant Tolerance to Heavy Metal Stress: What We Know?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Dunja Malenica & Marko Kass & Rajeev Bhat, 2022. "Sustainable Management and Valorization of Agri-Food Industrial Wastes and By-Products as Animal Feed: For Ruminants, Non-Ruminants and as Poultry Feed," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-23, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:12:y:2021:i:1:p:31-:d:712939. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.