IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jagris/v10y2020i3p88-d335810.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Equivalent Ratio in the Intercropping of Cucumber with Lettuce as a Function of Cucumber Population Density

Author

Listed:
  • Rodolfo Gustavo Teixeira Ribas

    (Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Rondônia (IFRO), Cacoal 76960-970, Brazil)

  • Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho

    (Agricultural Production Sciences Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14.884-900, Brazil)

  • Alexson Filgueiras Dutra

    (Agricultural Production Sciences Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14.884-900, Brazil)

  • José Carlos Barbosa

    (Agricultural Production Sciences Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14.884-900, Brazil)

  • Glauco de Souza Rolim

    (Agricultural Production Sciences Department, São Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal 14.884-900, Brazil)

Abstract

Lettuce and cucumber are two important vegetables cultivated in greenhouses. Intercropping can increase the yield without increasing the demands for inputs. A more efficient use of resources in production systems can reduce costs and environmental impacts. We evaluated the land equivalent ratio (LER) of intercropping cucumber and lettuce as a function of the cucumber population. An experiment was conducted in a greenhouse to evaluate the cucumber population density (100, 85, 70, and 55% of 2.35 plants m −2 ) and two lettuce cultivars, ‘Lucy Brown’ and ‘Vanda’. The cucumber population density affected the amount of photosynthetically active radiation that reached the lettuce. The higher the density, the lower the total fresh mass and yield of the two lettuce cultivars. Fruit yield per plant and per area decreased and increased, respectively, as the density increased. LER was highest when cucumber was intercropped with ‘Vanda’ lettuce. LER increased with the density of ‘Vanda’ but decreased for ‘Lucy Brown’. ‘Lucy Brown’ produced commercial traits (head formation) only at the lowest density (55%). The presence of lettuce did not affect the cucumber yield per plant or per area. The intercropped system used land more efficiently than monocultured crops of lettuce and cucumber, with better results for ‘Vanda’ than ‘Lucy Brown’.

Suggested Citation

  • Rodolfo Gustavo Teixeira Ribas & Arthur Bernardes Cecílio Filho & Alexson Filgueiras Dutra & José Carlos Barbosa & Glauco de Souza Rolim, 2020. "Land Equivalent Ratio in the Intercropping of Cucumber with Lettuce as a Function of Cucumber Population Density," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:88-:d:335810
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/3/88/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0472/10/3/88/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baumann, D. T. & Bastiaans, L. & Goudriaan, J. & van Laar, H. H. & Kropff, M. J., 2002. "Analysing crop yield and plant quality in an intercropping system using an eco-physiological model for interplant competition," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 73(2), pages 173-203, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leonardo Diogo Ehle Dias & Jucimar Ferreira Neves & Leandro Batista da Silva & Franciely da Silva Ponce & Oscar Mitsuo Yamashita & Rivanildo Dallacort & Santino Seabra Junior, 2020. "Seasonality on Transplanting Monocropped Lettuce and Intercropping With Staked Summer Squash," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 8(4), pages 316-329, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francis Okot & Mark Laing & Hussein Shimelis & Walter A. J. de Milliano, 2022. "Diagnostic Appraisal of the Sorghum Farming System and Breeding Priorities in Sierra Leone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-18, June.
    2. Mugi-Ngenga, E. & Bastiaans, L. & Anten, N.P.R. & Zingore, S. & Baijukya, F. & Giller, K.E., 2023. "The role of inter-specific competition for water in maize-legume intercropping systems in northern Tanzania," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    3. Victor Meriguetti Pinto & Jos C. van Dam & Quirijn de Jong van Lier & Klaus Reichardt, 2019. "Intercropping Simulation Using the SWAP Model: Development of a 2×1D Algorithm," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-19, June.
    4. Confalonieri, R., 2014. "CoSMo: A simple approach for reproducing plant community dynamics using a single instance of generic crop simulators," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 286(C), pages 1-10.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jagris:v:10:y:2020:i:3:p:88-:d:335810. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.