IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jadmsc/v11y2021i4p143-d691553.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Role of Public Entities in Suitable Provision of Public Services: Case Study from Slovakia

Author

Listed:
  • Viera Papcunová

    (Institute of Economics and Management, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, 949 74 Nitra, Slovakia
    Department of Regional Economics and Administration, Faculty of Economics and Administration, Masaryk University, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic)

  • Roman Vavrek

    (Department of Public Economics, Faculty of Economics, VŠB—Technical University of Ostrava, 702 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic)

  • Marek Dvořák

    (Department of Trade and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Management, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 165 00 Prague, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Local governments in the Slovak Republic are important in public administration and form an important part of the public sector, as they provide various public services. Until 1990, all public services were provided only by the state. The reform of public administration began in 1990 with the decentralization of competencies. Several competencies were transferred to local governments from the state, and thus municipalities began to provide public services that the state previously provided. Registry offices were the first to be acquired by local governments from the state. This study aimed to characterize the transfer of competencies and their financing from state administration to local government using the example of registry offices in the Slovak Republic. In the paper, we evaluated the financing of this competency from 2007 to 2018 at the level of individual regions of the Slovak Republic. The results of the analysis and testing of hypotheses indicated that a higher number of inhabitants in individual regions did not affect the number of actions at these offices, despite the fact that the main role of the registry office is to keep registry books, in which events, such as births, weddings, and deaths, are registered.

Suggested Citation

  • Viera Papcunová & Roman Vavrek & Marek Dvořák, 2021. "Role of Public Entities in Suitable Provision of Public Services: Case Study from Slovakia," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-18, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:143-:d:691553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/143/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/11/4/143/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Monica Da Ponte & Megan Foley & Charles H. Cho, 2020. "Assessing the Degree of Sustainability Integration in Canadian Public Sector Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Peter Adamišin & Juraj Tej, 2012. "The Analysis Of The Economic Efficiency Of Regions On The Level Of Nuts Iii And On The Proportion Of Municipial Taxation," Polish Journal of Management Studies, Czestochowa Technical University, Department of Management, vol. 5(1), pages 60-77, June.
    3. Dan Beare & Ruvena Buslovich & Cory Searcy, 2014. "Linkages between Corporate Sustainability Reporting and Public Policy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(6), pages 336-350, November.
    4. Burak Emil & Nemec Juraj, 2016. "Main Factors Determining the Slovak Tax System Performance," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 185-197, December.
    5. Anna, Petrenko, 2016. "Мaркування готової продукції як складова частина інформаційного забезпечення маркетингової діяльності підприємств овочепродуктового підкомплексу," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 2(1), March.
    6. Federica Farneti & James Guthrie, 2009. "Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(2), pages 89-98, June.
    7. Amanda Ball & Jan Bebbington, 2008. "Editorial: Accounting and Reporting for Sustainable Development in Public Service Organizations," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 323-326, December.
    8. Farneti, Federica & Guthrie, James, 2009. "Sustainability reporting by Australian public sector organisations: Why they report," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 89-98.
    9. Lucia Biondi & Enrico Bracci, 2018. "Sustainability, Popular and Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: A Fad and Fashion Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aurelio Tommasetti & Riccardo Mussari & Gennaro Maione & Daniela Sorrentino, 2020. "Sustainability Accounting and Reporting in the Public Sector: Towards Public Value Co-Creation?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Williams, Belinda & Wilmshurst, Trevor & Clift, Robert, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186.
    3. Giuseppe Nicol? & Gianluca Zanellato & Francesca Manes-Rossi & Adriana Tiron-Tudor, 2019. "Beyond Financial Reporting. Integrated Reporting and its determinants: Evidence from the context of European state-owned enterprises," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2019(2), pages 43-72.
    4. Cregård Anna & Sobis Iwona, 2017. "Dissemination of Environmental Information and its Effects on Stakeholders’ Decision-Making: A Comparative Study between Swedish and Polish Municipalities," NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 10(2), pages 9-47, December.
    5. Chiba, Soumaya & Talbot, David & Boiral, Olivier, 2018. "Sustainability adrift: An evaluation of the credibility of sustainability information disclosed by public organizations," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 328-340.
    6. Giuseppe Nicolò & Gianluca Zanellato & Adriana Tiron-Tudor, 2020. "Integrated Reporting and European State-Owned Enterprises: A Disclosure Analysis Pre and Post 2014/95/EU," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-17, March.
    7. Matteo Molinari & Maria Pia Maraghini & Angelo Riccaboni, 2021. "Reporting di Sostenibilit? e Controllo Manageriale: L?esperienza di Edison S.p.A," MANAGEMENT CONTROL, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2021(2), pages 61-86.
    8. Bouten, Lies & Everaert, Patricia & Van Liedekerke, Luc & De Moor, Lieven & Christiaens, Johan, 2011. "Corporate social responsibility reporting: A comprehensive picture?," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 187-204.
    9. Elisa Bonollo, 2015. "Disclosures in Local Healthcare Organizations? Social Reports. ?What?? and ?Why?? An Empirical Analysis of the Italian National Healthcare System," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2015(1), pages 41-75.
    10. Tudor Oprisor & Adriana TIRON-TUDOR & Cristina Silvia NISTOR, 2016. "The integrated reporting system: a new accountability enhancement tool for public sector entities," The Audit Financiar journal, Chamber of Financial Auditors of Romania, vol. 14(139), pages 747-747.
    11. Barone, Elisabetta & Ranamagar, Nathan & Solomon, Jill F., 2013. "A Habermasian model of stakeholder (non)engagement and corporate (ir)responsibility reporting," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 163-181.
    12. Lodovico Gherardi & Anna Maria Linsalata & Enrico Deidda Gagliardo & Rebecca Levy Orelli, 2021. "Accountability and Reporting for Sustainability and Public Value: Challenges in the Public Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Francesco Rosati & Roberta Costa & Armando Calabrese & Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum Pedersen, 2018. "Employee attitudes towards corporate social responsibility: a study on gender, age and educational level differences," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 1306-1319, November.
    14. Dina Patrisia & Shabbir Dastgir, 2017. "Diversification and corporate social performance in manufacturing companies," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 7(1), pages 121-139, April.
    15. Paolo Esposito & Spiridione Lucio Dicorato & Emanuele Doronzo, 2021. "The effect of ownership on sustainable development and environmental policy in urban waste management: An explicatory empirical analysis of Italian municipal corporations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1067-1079, February.
    16. Francisco J. López-Arceiz & Ana J. Bellostas & Pilar Rivera, 2018. "Twenty Years of Research on the Relationship Between Economic and Social Performance: A Meta-analysis Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 453-484, November.
    17. Lucia Biondi & Enrico Bracci, 2018. "Sustainability, Popular and Integrated Reporting in the Public Sector: A Fad and Fashion Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    18. Lynch, Barbara, 2010. "An examination of environmental reporting by Australian state government departments," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 32-45.
    19. Matteo Mura & Mariolina Longo & Ana Rita Domingues & Sara Zanni, 2019. "An Exploration of Content and Drivers of Online Sustainability Disclosure: A Study of Italian Organisations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-24, June.
    20. Weiheng Zhang & Yuvraj Gajpal & Srimantoorao. S. Appadoo & Qi Wei, 2020. "Multi-Depot Green Vehicle Routing Problem to Minimize Carbon Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-19, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jadmsc:v:11:y:2021:i:4:p:143-:d:691553. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.