IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gai/recdev/r21112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Systematization of Approaches to Assessing the Spatial Accessibility of Infrastructure
[Систематизация Подходов К Оценке Территориальной Доступности Инфраструктуры]

Author

Listed:
  • Makarov Andrey;

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; National Research University Higher School of Economics; Financial University)

  • Ponomarev Yury

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration; Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy)

  • Radchenko Daria

    (Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration)

Abstract

Thе article structurizes and generalizes the methods of territorial accessibility assessment taking into account the advantages and disadvantages of different methods (assessments based on physical or financial indicators, transport accessibility coefficients of infrastructure (Engel, Goltz), spatial availability indices, indexes based on a gravity model), and also offers a structured approach to their selection and use depending on the specific practical task being solved.

Suggested Citation

  • Makarov Andrey; & Ponomarev Yury & Radchenko Daria, 2021. "Systematization of Approaches to Assessing the Spatial Accessibility of Infrastructure [Систематизация Подходов К Оценке Территориальной Доступности Инфраструктуры]," Russian Economic Development, Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 10, pages 49-60, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gai:recdev:r21112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.iep.ru/files/RePEc/gai/recdev/r21112.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elburz, Zeynep & Nijkamp, Peter & Pels, Eric, 2017. "Public infrastructure and regional growth: Lessons from meta-analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1-8.
    2. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2000. "Non-Europe: The magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 136(2), pages 284-314, June.
    3. E. Kolomak., 2013. "Uneven Spatial Development in Russia: Explanations of New Economic Geography," VOPROSY ECONOMIKI, N.P. Redaktsiya zhurnala "Voprosy Economiki", vol. 2.
    4. Yi, Yoojin & Kim, Euijune, 2018. "Spatial economic impact of road and railroad accessibility on manufacturing output: Inter-modal relationship between road and railroad," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 144-153.
    5. Rosik, Piotr & Stępniak, Marcin & Komornicki, Tomasz, 2015. "The decade of the big push to roads in Poland: Impact on improvement in accessibility and territorial cohesion from a policy perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 134-146.
    6. Darya Maksimovna Radchenko & Yury Yuryevich Ponomarev, 2019. "About the Measurement of Transport Infrastructure Development," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 37-74.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makarov Andrey; & Ponomarev Yury & Radchenko Daria, 2021. "Систематизация Подходов К Оценке Территориальной Доступности Инфраструктуры," Russian Economic Development (in Russian), Gaidar Institute for Economic Policy, issue 10, pages 49-60, October.
    2. Kyungtaek Kim & Junghoon Kim, 2020. "The Impact of High-Speed Railways on Unequal Accessibility Based on Ticket Prices in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-17, August.
    3. Ana Condeço-Melhorado & Panayotis Christidis, 2018. "Road Accessibility in Border Regions: a Joint Approach," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(2), pages 363-383, June.
    4. Salas-Olmedo, María Henar & García, Patricia & Gutiérrez, Javier, 2015. "Accessibility and transport infrastructure improvement assessment: The role of borders and multilateral resistance," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 110-129.
    5. Jarosław M. Nazarczuk & Stanisław Umiński & Tomasz Brodzicki, 2020. "Determinants of the spatial distribution of exporters in regions: the role of ownership," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 64(3), pages 547-574, June.
    6. Yi, Yoojin & Kim, Euijune, 2018. "Spatial economic impact of road and railroad accessibility on manufacturing output: Inter-modal relationship between road and railroad," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 144-153.
    7. Acar, Mustafa & Afyonoglu, Burcu & Kus, Savas & Vural, Bengisu, 2007. "Turkey’s Agricultural Integration with the EU: Quantifying the Implications," Conference papers 331657, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    8. Keith Head & Thierry Mayer, 2008. "Detection Of Local Interactions From The Spatial Pattern Of Names In France," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 48(1), pages 67-95, February.
    9. Carballo, Jerónimo & Schaur, Georg & Graziano, Alejandro & Volpe Martincus, Christian, 2016. "Transit Trade," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 7688, Inter-American Development Bank.
    10. Karen Crabbé, 2013. "Are Your Firm´s Taxes Set in Warsaw? Spatial Tax Competition in Europe," FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, vol. 69(3), pages 317-337, September.
    11. Takatoshi Tabuchi & Jacques-François Thisse, 2006. "Regional Specialization, Urban Hierarchy, And Commuting Costs," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1295-1317, November.
    12. Behrens, Kristian & Gaigne, Carl & Ottaviano, Gianmarco I.P. & Thisse, Jacques-Francois, 2007. "Countries, regions and trade: On the welfare impacts of economic integration," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 1277-1301, July.
    13. Jeremy Wood & Samuel Meng, 2021. "The economic impacts of the 2018 Winter Olympics," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1303-1322, November.
    14. Andrzej Cieślik & Bartłomiej Rokicki, 2016. "Individual wages and regional market potential," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 24(4), pages 661-682, October.
    15. Festus Ebo Turkson, 2012. "Trade Agreements and Bilateral Trade in Sub-Saharan Africa: Estimating the Trade Effects of the EU-ACP PTA and RTAs," Discussion Papers 12/07, University of Nottingham, CREDIT.
    16. Christian Volpe Martincus, 2016. "Out of the Border Labyrinth: An Assessment of Trade Facilitation Initiatives in Latin America and the Caribbean," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 96856, February.
    17. Baños-Pino, José F. & Boto-García, David & Zapico, Emma, 2021. "Persistence and dynamics in the efficiency of toll motorways: The Spanish case," Efficiency Series Papers 2021/03, University of Oviedo, Department of Economics, Oviedo Efficiency Group (OEG).
    18. BEHRENS, Kristian, 2004. "Market size and urban hierarchy," LIDAM Discussion Papers CORE 2004029, Université catholique de Louvain, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE).
    19. Head, Keith & Mayer, Thierry, 2014. "Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook," Handbook of International Economics, in: Gopinath, G. & Helpman, . & Rogoff, K. (ed.), Handbook of International Economics, edition 1, volume 4, chapter 0, pages 131-195, Elsevier.
    20. Agnosteva, Delina E. & Anderson, James E. & Yotov, Yoto V., 2019. "Intra-national trade costs: Assaying regional frictions," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 32-50.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    transport; infrastructure; transport accessibility index; Russian regions;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D24 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Production; Cost; Capital; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity; Capacity
    • H54 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - Infrastructures
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure
    • R4 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gai:recdev:r21112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Olga Beloborodova (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gaidaru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.