IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/far/spaeco/y2012i3p111-134.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Russian Spatial Economics: a Bibliometric Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alexander Nikolaevich Demyanenko

    (Economic Research Institute FEB RAS)

  • Nikolay Alexandrovich Demyanenko

    (Khabarovsk School of Management)

  • Vadim Nikolaevich Ukrainsky

    (Pacific National University)

Abstract

The article gives a brief overview of bibliometric methods in science studies. In the empirical part of the paper the authors explore the hypothesis that spatial economics, while existing as a relatively independent and developing field of study, remains a fragmented one. A database of publications in the area of spatial economics extracted from the Scientific Electronic Library was used to study several indicators characterizing development dynamics of the field of spatial economics in the last 10–15 years, its level of fragmentation and the corpus of journals favored in the field. Publications were selected for inclusion in the study with three search queries: «regional economy», «economy of the region» and «spatial economics». Using a cross-citation matrix the study revealed and described communications network between leading Russian journals in the field of spatial economics. The authors conclude that studies on spatial economics are very ambiguous and fragmented, in spite of impressive growth rates of domestic publications on this topic

Suggested Citation

  • Alexander Nikolaevich Demyanenko & Nikolay Alexandrovich Demyanenko & Vadim Nikolaevich Ukrainsky, 2012. "Russian Spatial Economics: a Bibliometric Analysis," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 3, pages 111-134.
    • Handle: RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2012:i:3:p:111-134
    DOI: 10.14530/se.2012.3.111-134
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.spatial-economics.com/images/spatial-econimics/2012_3/SE.2012.3.111-134.Demyanenko.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://spatial-economics.com/eng/arkhiv-nomerov/2012/46-2012-3/509-SE-2012-3-111-134
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.14530/se.2012.3.111-134?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pavel Aleksandrovich Minakir & Alexander Nikolaevich Demyanenko, 2010. "Spatial Economics: The Evolution of Approaches and Methodology," Spatial Economics=Prostranstvennaya Ekonomika, Economic Research Institute, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (Khabarovsk, Russia), issue 2, pages 6-32.
    2. Benoît Godin, 2006. "On the origins of bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 68(1), pages 109-133, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gaviria-Marin, Magaly & Merigó, José M. & Baier-Fuentes, Hugo, 2019. "Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 194-220.
    2. Shuangqing Sheng & Wei Song & Hua Lian & Lei Ning, 2022. "Review of Urban Land Management Based on Bibliometrics," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-25, November.
    3. Andrej Kastrin & Dimitar Hristovski, 2021. "Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020)," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(2), pages 1415-1451, February.
    4. Bar-Ilan, Judit, 2008. "Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century—A review," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 2(1), pages 1-52.
    5. Konstantin Fursov & Yana Roschina & Oksana Balmush, 2016. "Determinants of Research Productivity: An Individual-level Lens," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 10(2), pages 44-56.
    6. Alberto Martín-Martín & Enrique Orduna-Malea & Emilio Delgado López-Cózar, 2018. "A novel method for depicting academic disciplines through Google Scholar Citations: The case of Bibliometrics," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 114(3), pages 1251-1273, March.
    7. Zhu, Wanying & Jin, Ching & Ma, Yifang & Xu, Cong, 2023. "Earlier recognition of scientific excellence enhances future achievements and promotes persistence," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 17(2).
    8. Thomas Cowhitt & Joshua Travis Brown & Anthony Lising Antonio, 2024. "The emergence and evolution of ambiguous ideas: an innovative application of social network analysis to support systematic literature reviews," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(11), pages 7005-7033, November.
    9. repec:plo:pone00:0006544 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. A. N. Shvetsov, 2023. "State Participation in Transformation of Russia’s Socioeconomic Space," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 192-223, March.
    11. Hagen, Nils T., 2015. "Contributory inequality alters assessment of academic output gap between comparable countries," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 9(3), pages 629-641.
    12. Mora, Luca & Deakin, Mark & Reid, Alasdair, 2019. "Combining co-citation clustering and text-based analysis to reveal the main development paths of smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 56-69.
    13. Andy Wai Kan Yeung & Emil D. Parvanov & Faisal A. Nawaz & Rehab A. Rayan & Maria Kletecka-Pulker & Harald Willschke & Atanas G. Atanasov, 2022. "COVID-19 Rapid Antigen Tests: Bibliometric Analysis of the Scientific Literature," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-9, September.
    14. Lindsey E. Wylie & Katherine P. Hazen & Lori A. Hoetger & Joshua A. Haby & Eve M. Brank, 2018. "Four decades of the journal Law and Human Behavior: a content analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 115(2), pages 655-693, May.
    15. Akmal, Adeel & Greatbanks, Richard & Foote, Jeff, 2020. "Lean thinking in healthcare – Findings from a systematic literature network and bibliometric analysis," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(6), pages 615-627.
    16. Fabian Muniesa & Dominique Linhardt, 2009. "At stake with implementation: trials of explicitness in the description of the state," CSI Working Papers Series 015, Centre de Sociologie de l'Innovation (CSI), Mines ParisTech.
    17. K. Katsaliaki & P. Galetsi & S. Kumar, 2022. "Supply chain disruptions and resilience: a major review and future research agenda," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 965-1002, December.
    18. Carolina Navarro-Lopez & Salvador Linares-Mustaros & Carles Mulet-Forteza, 2022. "“The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data†by John Aitchison (1986): A Bibliometric Overview," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    19. Rodríguez-Navarro, Alonso & Brito, Ricardo, 2018. "Double rank analysis for research assessment," Journal of Informetrics, Elsevier, vol. 12(1), pages 31-41.
    20. Nathasit Gerdsri & Alisa Kongthon & Sudatip Puengrusme, 2017. "Profiling the Research Landscape in Emerging Areas Using Bibliometrics and Text Mining: A Case Study of Biomedical Engineering (BME) in Thailand," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 14(02), pages 1-15, April.
    21. Muniesa, Fabian & Linhardt, Dominique, 2011. "Trials of explicitness in the implementation of public management reform," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 550-566.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:far:spaeco:y:2012:i:3:p:111-134. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sergey Rogov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecrinru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.