IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/fan/rissri/vhtml10.3280-riss2025oa19474.html

The Impact of environmental management on the sustainable development of territorial communities

Author

Listed:
  • Mykhailo Pyrtko
  • Valentyna Abalmasova
  • Mary Ene Atalawei
  • Oleksandr Govorun
  • Liliia Muntian

Abstract

Environmental management of territorial communities is important for preserving natural resources and mitigating environmental risks, which contributes to achieving sustainable development goals (SDGs). The aim of the study is to assess the effectiveness and impact of environmental protection expenditure (EPE) as an important tool of environmental management on the sustainable development of territorial communities. The study employs regression analysis, correlation analysis, and comparison methods. The study identified the most effective areas of EPE by territorial communities. These include: other activities in the field of ecology and protection of natural resources, environmental protection measures at the expense of special-purpose funds, protection and rational use of natural resources. The effectiveness of such areas was determined through a regression analysis of the impact of EPE on the environmental indicators of the relevant regions. The volume of pollutant emissions into the atmosphere is most affected by expenditures on other activities in the field of ecology and protection of natural resources with a regression coefficient of -0.542787. Environmental protection measures at the expense of special funds have a significant impact on total waste generation (-0.782511) and on the volume of polluted wastewater (-0.443516). Regression analysis did not reveal a statistically significant impact of any of the variables on the I-III hazard class waste generation and the number of cases of malignant neoplasms. The environmental policy of territorial communities should focus on the identified effective areas of expenditure and revise expenditures that do not contribute to improving environmental indicators. It should be noted that the volume of expenditures is not the most important factor in efficiency ? the quality of planning and management is of key importance. The findings may be useful for territorial communities to improve the environmental management system in terms of managing the effectiveness of expenditures on environmental protection.

Suggested Citation

  • Mykhailo Pyrtko & Valentyna Abalmasova & Mary Ene Atalawei & Oleksandr Govorun & Liliia Muntian, 2025. "The Impact of environmental management on the sustainable development of territorial communities," RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA', FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2025(1), pages 89-104.
    • Handle: RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2025oa19474
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/Scheda_Rivista.aspx?IDArticolo=77962&Tipo=ArticoloPDF
    Download Restriction: Single articles can be downloaded buying download credits, for info: https://www.francoangeli.it/DownloadCredit
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leonardo S. Alaimo & Filomena Maggino, 2020. "Sustainable Development Goals Indicators at Territorial Level: Conceptual and Methodological Issues—The Italian Perspective," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 147(2), pages 383-419, January.
    2. Gianluca Iannucci & Federico Martellozzo & Filippo Randelli, 2022. "Sustainable development of rural areas: a dynamic model in between tourism exploitation and landscape decline," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 32(3), pages 991-1016, July.
    3. Angelo Jonas Imperiale & Frank Vanclay, 2021. "Conceptualizing community resilience and the social dimensions of risk to overcome barriers to disaster risk reduction and sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 891-905, September.
    4. Veronika Zavratnik & Dan Podjed & Jure Trilar & Nina Hlebec & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2020. "Sustainable and Community-Centred Development of Smart Cities and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-17, May.
    5. Xiaojuan Zhang & Zhengang Zhang, 2020. "How Do Smart Villages Become a Way to Achieve Sustainable Development in Rural Areas? Smart Village Planning and Practices in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Claudia Patricia Maldonado-Erazo & María de la Cruz del Río-Rama & Sandra Patricia Miranda-Salazar & Nancy P. Tierra-Tierra, 2022. "Strengthening of Community Tourism Enterprises as a Means of Sustainable Development in Rural Areas: A Case Study of Community Tourism Development in Chimborazo," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Evgenia Anastasiou & Stella Manika & Konstantina Ragazou & Ioannis Katsios, 2021. "Territorial and Human Geography Challenges: How Can Smart Villages Support Rural Development and Population Inclusion?," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Qian Wang & Shixian Luo & Jiao Zhang & Katsunori Furuya, 2022. "Increased Attention to Smart Development in Rural Areas: A Scientometric Analysis of Smart Village Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-28, August.
    3. Ida Camminatiello & Rosaria Lombardo & Mario Musella & Gianmarco Borrata, 2024. "A Model for Evaluating Inequalities in Sustainability," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 175(3), pages 879-898, December.
    4. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Vincenzina Vitale, 2020. "Bayesian Networks Model Averaging for Bes Indicators," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 897-919, October.
    5. Becker, Jörg & Distel, Bettina & Grundmann, Matthias & Hupperich, Thomas & Kersting, Norbert & Löschel, Andreas & Parreira do Amaral, Marcelo & Scholta, Hendrik, 2021. "Challenges and potentials of digitalisation for small and mid-sized towns: Proposition of a transdisciplinary research agenda," ERCIS Working Papers 36, University of Münster, European Research Center for Information Systems (ERCIS).
    6. Leonardo Salvatore Alaimo & Alberto Arcagni & Marco Fattore & Filomena Maggino, 2021. "Synthesis of Multi-indicator System Over Time: A Poset-based Approach," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 157(1), pages 77-99, August.
    7. Yitian Ren, 2023. "Rural China Staggering towards the Digital Era: Evolution and Restructuring," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Sylwia Barwicka & Małgorzata Milecka, 2022. "The “Perfect Village” Model as a Result of Research on Transformation of Plant Cover—Case Study of the Puchaczów Commune," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-22, November.
    9. Simona Stojanova & Nina Cvar & Jurij Verhovnik & Nataša Božić & Jure Trilar & Andrej Kos & Emilija Stojmenova Duh, 2022. "Rural Digital Innovation Hubs as a Paradigm for Sustainable Business Models in Europe’s Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Daniel Hoehn & María Margallo & Jara Laso & Israel Ruiz-Salmón & Laura Batlle-Bayer & Alba Bala & Pere Fullana-i-Palmer & Rubén Aldaco, 2021. "A Novel Composite Index for the Development of Decentralized Food Production, Food Loss, and Waste Management Policies: A Water-Climate-Food Nexus Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-14, March.
    11. Pierpaolo D’Urso & Vincenzina Vitale, 2021. "Modeling Local BES Indicators by Copula-Based Bayesian Networks," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 153(3), pages 823-847, February.
    12. Martina De Anna & Enrico Ivaldi, 2025. "Multidimensional Educational Inequality in Italy: A Stacking-Based Approach for Gender and Territorial Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Cantone, Giulio Giacomo & Tomaselli, Venera, 2025. "On the coherence of composite indexes of well-being: Multiverse analysis for formative models of measurement," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    14. Vanda Ningrum & Chotib & Athor Subroto, 2022. "Urban Community Resilience Amidst the Spreading of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A Rapid Scoping Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-12, September.
    15. Monika Spychalska-Wojtkiewicz, 2020. "The Relation between Sustainable Development Trends and Customer Value Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(14), pages 1-18, July.
    16. Bernardino Benito & María-Dolores Guillamón & Ana-María Ríos, 2025. "What factors make a municipality more involved in meeting the Sustainable Development Goals? Empirical evidence," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10737-10760, May.
    17. Ali, Yousaf & Tariq, Minahill & Amjad, Mohammad Hamza, 2025. "Modelling and classification of barriers in the construction of smart villages in developing countries," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    18. Gustavo Carolino Girardi & Priscila Rubbo & Evandro Eduardo Broday & Maik Arnold & Claudia Tania Picinin, 2024. "Comparative Analysis between Quality of Life and Human Labor in Countries Belonging to G7 and BRICS Blocks: Proposition of Discriminant Analysis Model," Economies, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    19. Banica, Alexandru & Corodescu-Rosca, Ema & Kourtit, Karima & Nijkamp, Peter, 2025. "Actionable policy responses to disaster threats – A comparative study on resilience and sustainability in global cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    20. Eriko Miyama, 2023. "Regional Agriculture and Social Capital after Massive Natural Disasters: The Case of Miyagi Prefecture after the Great East Japan Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-15, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:fan:rissri:v:html10.3280/riss2025oa19474. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Stefania Rosato (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.francoangeli.it/riviste/sommario.aspx?IDRivista=168 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.