IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxivy2021i1p776-789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Land Resources and Land Use Management in Ukraine: Problems of Agreement of the Institutional Structure, Functions and Authorities

Author

Listed:
  • Nataliia Tretiak
  • Oksana Sakal
  • Andrii Kovalenko
  • Slawomir Kalinowski
  • Valentyna Tretiak
  • Halyna Shtohryn
  • Ivan Behal
  • Marek Klodzinski

Abstract

Purpose: The article aims to present and discuss the analysis of the institutional structure of land resources and land use management in Ukraine. Design/Methodology/Approach: Sustainable logical and structural integrity of the institutional structure of land resources and land use management is considered as a precondition for economic, ecological, and social growth of the country, the security of social well-being base on legally approved tasks and powers as to agreement of the distribution of responsibilities and authorities between managerial bodies in terms of performance of the functions and regulatory mechanisms of land resources and land use management by the bodies of the executive branch and local government. Findings: Analysis of the institutional structure of land resources and land use management in Ukraine confirms sufficient differentiation and scattering of the managerial functions between numerous state institutions and lack of the appropriate coordination of managerial decisions and control for exercising the authorities and responsibilities. Practical Implications: The proposed matrix of distribution of the responsibilities and authorities enables identifying the potential of institutional transformations in terms of efficient management of land resources and land use, particularly the implementation of changes, which are necessary for Ukraine. Originality/Value: It is proved that the most critical factors for the effectiveness of sustainable land use policy are the establishment of a simple managerial vertical and horizontal of institutions, adequate space organization of the territory, securing working relation “bottom-up” and “top to bottom” of the decisions, and actions of all institutes and structures of the land policy, including bodies of executive power with local government, with individual land-owners and land-users.

Suggested Citation

  • Nataliia Tretiak & Oksana Sakal & Andrii Kovalenko & Slawomir Kalinowski & Valentyna Tretiak & Halyna Shtohryn & Ivan Behal & Marek Klodzinski, 2021. "Land Resources and Land Use Management in Ukraine: Problems of Agreement of the Institutional Structure, Functions and Authorities," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 776-789.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:776-789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ersj.eu/journal/1994/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mykhailo Matvieiev, 2018. "Land Reform in the Credit Cycle Framework: The Case of Ukraine," Visnyk of the National Bank of Ukraine, National Bank of Ukraine, issue 245, pages 4-29.
    2. Pham Quang Dieu, 2016. "Agriculture Growth after 30 Years of Renovation – Necessity for a New Thought on Rice Cultivated Land for Exports and Food Security," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 4, pages 145-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alena Harbiankova & Sławomir Kalinowski, 2023. "MSW Management to Zero Waste: Challenges and Perspectives in Belarus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Nataliia Tretiak & Oksana Sakal & Andrii Kovalenko & Olena Vrublevska & Volska Anheliia & Halyna Shtohryn & Ivan Behal, 2022. "Institutional Environment of the Land Resources and Land Use Management in Ukraine: Problems of Coordination of the Institutional Structure, Functions and Authorities," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 5, pages 163-178.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Keywords

      Land reform; land resources management; management of land use; managerial functions; authorities of managerial bodies; land fund; sustainable development; public welfare.;
      All these keywords.

      JEL classification:

      • H83 - Public Economics - - Miscellaneous Issues - - - Public Administration
      • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
      • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land
      • Q28 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Government Policy
      • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:1:p:776-789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.