IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxxiiiy2020ispecial1p749-759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards Green Growth: A Taxonomic Analysis Based on the Headline Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Armand Kasztelan

Abstract

Purpose: Based on headline indicators, green growth's aggregate indexes have been constructed for 28 EU countries (including the United Kingdom). This allowed creating a ranking of the countries and identifying the strengths and weaknesses of green growth both at the European and national levels. Design/Methodology/Approach: Research was carried out based on the taxonomic linear ordering method. The reference years 2013-2018 were chosen due to data availability for individual indicators on the OECD database. Findings: The analysis showed that Sweden features the highest level of green growth, while Estonia received the lowest rating. Generalizing the study results, it can be stated that the level of 'greening' growth in European Union countries is still low. Practical Implications: The research results fill in the existing information gap by providing an answer to the fundamental question: How can green growth be evaluated synthetically based on headline indicators? This also allows countries to identify areas where their performance is weak and prioritize their mitigation measures accordingly. Originality/Value: The proposed method advances the OECD approach by adding evaluation metrics to assess each country's performance relative to other jurisdictions by indicator and by a synthetic measure.

Suggested Citation

  • Armand Kasztelan, 2020. "Towards Green Growth: A Taxonomic Analysis Based on the Headline Indicators," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 749-759.
    • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:749-759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.ersj.eu/journal/1790/download
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Armand Kasztelan & Anna Nowak & Joanna Hawlena, 2019. "Green Growth in Agriculture in the European Union: Myth or Reality?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 35-48.
    2. repec:prg:jnlpep:v:preprint:id:626:p:1-14 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Armand Kasztelan, 2017. "Green Growth, Green Economy and Sustainable Development: Terminological and Relational Discourse," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2017(4), pages 487-499.
    4. Alex Bowen & Cameron Hepburn, 2014. "Green growth: an assessment," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 30(3), pages 407-422.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Pervin Ersoy & Gülmüş Börühan & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Jorge Hernandez Hormazabal & Yigit Kazancoglu & Çisem Lafcı, 2022. "Impact of information technology and knowledge sharing on circular food supply chains for green business growth," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1875-1904, July.
    2. Armand Kasztelan & Anna Nowak & Joanna Hawlena, 2019. "Green Growth in Agriculture in the European Union: Myth or Reality?," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 35-48.
    3. Efi Drimili & Ζoi Gareiou & Efthimios Zervas, 2020. "Public perceptions of the concept of green growth: application in Athens, Greece, during a period of economic crisis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(7), pages 6053-6076, October.
    4. Hensher, Martin & Canny, Ben & Zimitat, Craig & Campbell, Julie & Palmer, Andrew, 2020. "Health care, overconsumption and uneconomic growth: A conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 266(C).
    5. Aldieri, Luigi & Bruno, Bruna & Makkonen, Teemu & Vinci, Concetto Paolo, 2023. "Environmental innovations, geographically mediated knowledge spillovers, economic and environmental performance," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    6. Xiaoxue Liu & Fuzhen Cao & Shuangshuang Fan, 2022. "Does Human Capital Matter for China’s Green Growth?—Examination Based on Econometric Model and Machine Learning Methods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Bettina Becker, 2023. "Green Innovation Strategies, Innovation Success, and Firm Performance—Evidence from a Panel of Spanish Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Candice Howarth & Peter Bryant & Adam Corner & Sam Fankhauser & Andy Gouldson & Lorraine Whitmarsh & Rebecca Willis, 2020. "Building a Social Mandate for Climate Action: Lessons from COVID-19," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 1107-1115, August.
    9. Oleksandr Shpykuliak & Ilona Bilokinna, 2019. ""Green" Cooperatives In The Formation Of An Institutional Mechanism Of Development Of Alternative Power Engineering In The Agrarian Sector Of The Economy," Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, Publishing house "Baltija Publishing", vol. 5(2).
    10. Magdalena Ziolo & Iwona Bak & Anna Spoz & Beata Zofia Filipiak & Jaroslaw Kozuba & Piotr Niedzielski, 2020. "A Sustainable Approach for Financial and Energy Markets: The Perspective of OECD European Countries," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(Special 1), pages 462-487.
    11. Andrea Bigano & Aleksander Śniegocki & Jacopo Zotti, 2016. "Policies for a More Dematerialized EU Economy. Theoretical Underpinnings, Political Context and Expected Feasibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-22, July.
    12. Uma Shankar Singh & Małgorzata Rutkowska & Paweł Bartoszczuk, 2022. "Renewable Energy Decision Criteria on Green Consumer Values Comparing Poland and India Aligned with Environment Policy for Sustainable Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-26, July.
    13. Groom, Ben & Linsenmeier, Manuel & Roth, Sefi, 2023. "Some like it cold: Heterogeneity in the temperature-economy relationships of Europe," SocArXiv tcnad, Center for Open Science.
    14. Seyed Meysam Khoshnava & Raheleh Rostami & Rosli Mohamad Zin & Dalia Štreimikienė & Alireza Yousefpour & Wadim Strielkowski & Abbas Mardani, 2019. "Aligning the Criteria of Green Economy (GE) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) to Implement Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Katarzyna Pawlewicz & Iwona Cieślak, 2024. "An Analysis of the Relationships between Social Capital Levels and Selected Green Economy Indicators on the Example of Polish Voivodeships," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-22, February.
    16. Jae-Hyup Lee & Jisuk Woo, 2020. "Green New Deal Policy of South Korea: Policy Innovation for a Sustainability Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-17, December.
    17. Oleg RYBALKIN, 2022. "Sustainable development goals progress in the European Union: correlation with EEPSE green economy index," Access Journal, Access Press Publishing House, vol. 3(2), pages 121-135, April.
    18. Pahle, Michael & Pachauri, Shonali & Steinbacher, Karoline, 2016. "Can the Green Economy deliver it all? Experiences of renewable energy policies with socio-economic objectives," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 1331-1341.
    19. Maria Cristina Arcuri & Raoul Pisani, 2021. "Is Trade Credit a Sustainable Resource for Medium-Sized Italian Green Companies?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    20. Teun Wolters, 2022. "Why is ecological sustainability so difficult to achieve? An in‐context discussion of conceptual barriers," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 2025-2039, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Green growth; sustainable development; taxonomic linear ordering method; EU countries.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • O44 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Environment and Growth
    • Q56 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environment and Development; Environment and Trade; Sustainability; Environmental Accounts and Accounting; Environmental Equity; Population Growth
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xxiii:y:2020:i:special1:p:749-759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.