IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ers/journl/vxixy2016i3ap203-227.html

Program-Targeted Regulation of the Regional Consumer Market

Author

Listed:
  • E.A. Neretina
  • E.V. Soldatova
  • N.S. Komleva
  • N.O. Kolchina
  • E.G. Shcherbakova

Abstract

The primary strategic tasks for development of the Russian Federation and its regions are the increase of the level and quality of life and increase of the share of the middle class on the basis of modernization and restructuring the economy, the growth of entrepreneurial and innovative activities and competitiveness. For the solution of these problems the development of the consumer market should play an important role, performing important economic and social functions. In the article the results of the study of scientific views of foreign and national scientists on the category "consumer market" are shown from the perspective of the principle of historical and logical unity, theoretical and conceptual approaches to its formation and development are systematized, positive trends in its development are revealed; negative social consequences associated with excessive consumption growth and the formation of a consumer society are proved (violation of the ecological balance, people health aggravation, change of people’s attitudes). The necessity of government regulation of the consumer market on all the levels is proved (federal, regional and municipal) based on the prospective vision and its development strategy in the context of globalization, Russia's accession to WTO and the implementation of the sanctions against Russia by the United States, several European and Asian countries. As a methodological approach to solve identified problems on the regional level it is proposed to use the program-targeted regulation of the consumer market, which allows connecting the objectives with the resources and deadlines for their implementation by particular executives. Its use also allows authorities to develop alternative solutions for the tasks on the basis of the justification of priorities in the development of the consumer market and assessment of the risks associated with the implementation of program activities.

Suggested Citation

  • E.A. Neretina & E.V. Soldatova & N.S. Komleva & N.O. Kolchina & E.G. Shcherbakova, 2016. "Program-Targeted Regulation of the Regional Consumer Market," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3A), pages 203-227.
  • Handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xix:y:2016:i:3a:p:203-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ersj.eu/repec/ers/papers/16_3_A_p12.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. H C W L Williams & K S Kim & D Martin, 1990. "Location-Spatial Interaction Models: 1. Benefit-Maximizing Configurations of Services," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 22(8), pages 1079-1089, August.
    2. Rutherford,Malcolm, 1996. "Institutions in Economics," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521574471, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Alfonso Dau & Aya S. Chacar & Marjorie A. Lyles & Jiatao Li, 2022. "Informal institutions and international business: Toward an integrative research agenda," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(6), pages 985-1010, August.
    2. Jean-Baptiste Fleury & Alain Marciano, 2022. "Methodological Individualism and the Foundations of the "Law and Economics" movement," Post-Print hal-03820441, HAL.
    3. Igor Matutinović, 2005. "The Microeconomic Foundations of Business Cycles: From Institutions to Autocatalytic Networks," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(4), pages 867-898, December.
    4. Angela Ambrosino & Magda Fontana & Anna Azzurra Gigante, 2018. "Shifting Boundaries In Economics: The Institutional Cognitive Strand And The Future Of Institutional Economics," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(3), pages 767-791, July.
    5. Anna Klimina, 2013. "Placing the Analysis of Contemporary State Capitalism within an Evolutionary Discourse," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(2), pages 545-554.
    6. Rafael Suárez‐Vega & Dolores R. Santos‐Peñate & Pablo Dorta‐González, 2007. "The follower location problem with attraction thresholds," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 86(1), pages 123-137, March.
    7. Galbács, Péter, 2018. "A közgazdaságtan felszabadítása. A neoklasszikus ortodoxia és az intézményi közgazdaságtan közötti ellentét néhány módszertani kérdése [Freedom for economics. Some methodological aspects of the neo," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 44-65.
    8. Rasto Ovin, 2001. "The Nature of Institutional Change in Transition," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(2), pages 133-146.
    9. Giulio Palermo, 2000. "Economic Power and the Firm in New Institutional Economics: Two Conflicting Problems," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 573-601, September.
    10. Abdallah Zouache, 2014. "De la question coloniale chez les anciens et néo-institutionnalistes," Revue d'économie politique, Dalloz, vol. 124(1), pages 129-149.
    11. Sandra Tavares Silva & Aurora A.C. Teixeira, 2006. "An evolutionary model of firms' institutional behavior focusing on labor decisions," FEP Working Papers 227, Universidade do Porto, Faculdade de Economia do Porto.
    12. Marianne Van Der Steen & John Groenewegen, 2009. "Policy entrepreneurship: empirical inquiry into policy agents and institutional structures," Journal of Innovation Economics, De Boeck Université, vol. 0(2), pages 41-61.
    13. Peter Boettke & Christopher Coyne & Peter Leeson & Frederic Sautet, 2005. "The New Comparative Political Economy," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 18(3), pages 281-304, December.
    14. Woźniak-Jęchorek, Beata, . "Struktura rynku pracy w świetle ekonomii instytucjonalnej," Gospodarka Narodowa-The Polish Journal of Economics, Szkoła Główna Handlowa w Warszawie / SGH Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 2013(9).
    15. Elias Khalil, 1999. "Institutions, Naturalism and Evolution," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(1), pages 61-81.
    16. Germán Burgos Silva, 2002. "Derecho y desarrollo económico: de la teoría de la modernización a la Nueva Economía Institucional," Revista de Economía Institucional, Universidad Externado de Colombia - Facultad de Economía, vol. 4(7), pages 174-199, July-Dece.
    17. Sterns, James A. & Sterns, Patricia Aust & Burkhardt, Jeffrey, 2002. "All For Efficiency And Efficiency For All -- Dispelling Myths About "Costly" New Quality Attributes In Food Products," 2002 Annual meeting, July 28-31, Long Beach, CA 19634, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    18. Robert Ekelund & Robert Tollison, 1997. "On neoinstitutional theory and preclassical economies: mercantilism revisited," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 4(3), pages 375-399.
    19. Brian Dollery & Joe Wallis, 2000. "A Note on the Coherence of New Public Management as a Managerial Philosophy," International Review of Public Administration, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(1), pages 81-91, June.
    20. Salvatore Rizzello & Margherita Turvani, 2000. "Institutions Meet Mind: The Way out of a Deadlock," Constitutional Political Economy, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 165-180, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ers:journl:v:xix:y:2016:i:3a:p:203-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Marios Agiomavritis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://ersj.eu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.