IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/energy/v2y2022i3id7062.html

Optimal Home Energy Management Considering Uncertainties in Occupancy, Consumption, and Electricity Price

Author

Listed:
  • Amin Dindar
  • Salman Mohagheghi

Abstract

Power utilities issue demand response (DR) during the hours of peak load in order to reduce the demand on the network and provide congestion relief to overloaded circuits. While traditional residential DR programs are mainly one-way in the form of remote on/off control of air conditioning (A/C) units, residential customers can adopt a more proactive role through utilizing the capabilities of smart meters and home energy management systems (HEMS). HEMS can monitor energy rates and DR incentives, and accordingly change the temperature setpoint of the A/C unit and/or shift appliance loads from peak to off-peak hours in order to maximize financial benefits. All this can be achieved in an automated human-out-of-the-loop fashion. From the HEMS’ standpoint, the task can be viewed as solving an optimization problem with the goal of reducing power consumption while maximizing financial gains. However, another equally important goal would be to ensure that the comfort level of residents, if present in the building, is not compromised. This is especially crucial during periods of extreme temperatures where maintaining an acceptable indoor temperature has a direct impact on the residents’ health, especially children and the elderly. What makes this multi-objective optimization problem more challenging is the uncertain nature of some model parameters, e.g., electricity rates, building occupancy levels, and demand. This paper presents a novel solution for energy management of a smart home using DR by considering the above factors. To ensure that the solution found is feasible against all possible uncertainties, a robust model is developed and solved for a given time horizon. As shown through simulation results, considering uncertainties are necessary, since they can change the solution in a nonnegligible way.

Suggested Citation

  • Amin Dindar & Salman Mohagheghi, 2022. "Optimal Home Energy Management Considering Uncertainties in Occupancy, Consumption, and Electricity Price," European Journal of Energy Research, European Open Science, vol. 2(3), pages 1-8, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:2:y:2022:i:3:id:7062
    DOI: 10.24018/ejenergy.2022.2.3.62
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/view/7062
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy/article/download/7062/1025
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejenergy.2022.2.3.62?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dylan Jones & Mehrdad Tamiz, 2010. "Practical Goal Programming," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, edition 1, number 978-1-4419-5771-9, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Francisco Salas-Molina & Filippo Bistaffa & Juan A. Rodriguez-Aguilar, 2024. "A General Approach for Computing a Consensus in Group Decision Making That Integrates Multiple Ethical Principles," Papers 2401.07818, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2024.
    2. Hocine, Amin & Zhuang, Zheng-Yun & Kouaissah, Noureddine & Li, Der-Chiang, 2020. "Weighted-additive fuzzy multi-choice goal programming (WA-FMCGP) for supporting renewable energy site selection decisions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 285(2), pages 642-654.
    3. Ramos, Francisco López & Batres, Rafael & De-la-Cruz-Márquez, Cynthia Griselle & Anzures, Melina López, 2023. "Optimization models for nopal crop planning with land usage expansion and government subsidy," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    4. Umar Muhammad Modibbo & Irfan Ali & Aquil Ahmed, 2021. "Multi-objective optimization modelling for analysing sustainable development goals of Nigeria: Agenda 2030," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 9529-9563, June.
    5. Walter Briec & Laurent Cavaignac & Kristiaan Kerstens, 2020. "Input Efficiency Measures: A Generalized, Encompassing Formulation," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1836-1849, November.
    6. Cinzia Colapinto & Raja Jayaraman & Simone Marsiglio, 2017. "Multi-criteria decision analysis with goal programming in engineering, management and social sciences: a state-of-the art review," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 251(1), pages 7-40, April.
    7. Rahimeh Neamatian Monemi & Shahin Gelareh & Anass Nagih & Dylan Jones, 2021. "Bi-objective load balancing multiple allocation hub location: a compromise programming approach," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 296(1), pages 363-406, January.
    8. Carland, Corinne & Goentzel, Jarrod & Montibeller, Gilberto, 2018. "Modeling the values of private sector agents in multi-echelon humanitarian supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(2), pages 532-543.
    9. Zgajnar, Jaka & Kavcic, Stane, 2012. "Farm management support based on mathematical programming; an example of fertilization planning," Agroeconomia Croatica, Croatian Society of Agricultural Economists, vol. 2(01), pages 1-8, March.
    10. Huang, Zishuo & Yu, Hang & Chu, Xiangyang & Peng, Zhenwei, 2017. "A goal programming based model system for community energy plan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 893-901.
    11. Cherif, Mohamed Sadok, 2024. "A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 13(C).
    12. Jiménez, Mariano & Bilbao-Terol, Amelia & Arenas-Parra, Mar, 2021. "Incorporating preferential weights as a benchmark into a Sequential Reference Point Method," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 291(2), pages 575-585.
    13. Mohammad Taleghani, 2017. "Synergistic Role of Balanced Scorecard/Activity Based Costing and Goal Programming Combined Model on Strategic Cost Management," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 7(3), pages 586-593.
    14. Foad Mahdavi Pajouh & Dahai Xing & Yingjue Zhou & Sharethram Hariharan & Balabhaskar Balasundaram & Tieming Liu & Ramesh Sharda, 2013. "A Specialty Steel Bar Company Uses Analytics to Determine Available-to-Promise Dates," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 43(6), pages 503-517, December.
    15. Marta Ezquerro & Marta Pardos & Luis Diaz-Balteiro, 2019. "Sustainability in Forest Management Revisited Using Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Techniques," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-24, July.
    16. Kay Giesecke & Baeho Kim & Jack Kim & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2014. "Optimal Credit Swap Portfolios," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(9), pages 2291-2307, September.
    17. Juan Ribes & Jacinto González-Pachón, 2021. "Risk Attitude in Multicriteria Decision Analysis: A Compromise Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-14, June.
    18. Jones, Dylan & Jimenez, Mariano, 2013. "Incorporating additional meta-objectives into the extended lexicographic goal programming framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 227(2), pages 343-349.
    19. Mila Bravo & Dylan Jones & David Pla-Santamaria & Francisco Salas-Molina, 2022. "Encompassing statistically unquantifiable randomness in goal programming: an application to portfolio selection," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(5), pages 5685-5706, November.
    20. Mila Bravo & Dylan Jones & David Pla-Santamaria & Graham Wall, 2018. "Robustness of weighted goal programming models: an analytical measure and its application to offshore wind-farm site selection in United Kingdom," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 267(1), pages 65-79, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:energy:v:2:y:2022:i:3:id:7062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support Team (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejenergy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.