IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/epw/ejeng0/v4y2019i1id61096.html

Comparative Analysis on Economic Viability of Independent Power Producing System in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Christopher Udoka
  • Barinyima Nkoi
  • Felix E. Oparadike

Abstract

The aim of this research is to compare the economic benefits of various types of power generating technologies such as gas turbines, wind turbines and solar energy that is suitable for power producing plants in Nigeria. The study conducts economic assessment by developing a data-intensive spread-sheet-based model. The model estimates the unit cost of electricity generated by a 10MW capacity solar photovoltaic system (PV), Wind turbine and Gas Turbine. Comparison based on investment cost and capacity charge indicated that the levelized cost of electricity (LCOEsolar) by solar PV was found to be $0.05188 per kWh with a net present value of (-$3,520,003), (LCOEwind), by Wind turbine was found to be $0.0732per kWh or with a net present cost of (-$24,486,076), while (LCOEgas) by Gas turbine was found to be $0.07214 per kWh or with a net present value of ($11,813,136). Results obtained with reference to LCOE showed that solar PV has the lowest cost of power generation, followed by gas turbine, and then wind turbine. Consequently, comparison based on decision for economic and preferable energy to invest in as well as the annual return the investment is projected to generate indicated that the internal rate of return (IRR) for both solar PV and wind turbine was found to be negative with a simple payback period of 14 and 35 years respectively, while internal rate of return (IRR) for gas turbine was found to be 18.67% with 5 years payback period. Hence, result obtained with reference to IRR and SPBP showed that gas turbine is the most economic and preferable energy generating technology to invest in since it is projected to generate 18.67% annual return from the investment in a minimum of 5 years period as compared to solar PV and wind turbine. Although natural gas-based power generation has lower upfront costs but it is vulnerable to volatile fuel prices, whereas electricity generation from renewables has higher upfront costs but provides electricity at costs that are highly predictable.

Suggested Citation

  • Christopher Udoka & Barinyima Nkoi & Felix E. Oparadike, 2019. "Comparative Analysis on Economic Viability of Independent Power Producing System in Nigeria," European Journal of Engineering and Technology Research, European Open Science, vol. 4(1), pages 75-80, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:4:y:2019:i:1:id:61096
    DOI: 10.24018/ejeng.2019.4.1.1096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/view/61096
    File Function: Abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng/article/download/61096/12007
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.24018/ejeng.2019.4.1.1096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fazelpour, Farivar & Soltani, Nima & Rosen, Marc A., 2014. "Feasibility of satisfying electrical energy needs with hybrid systems for a medium-size hotel on Kish Island, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 856-865.
    2. Bekele, Getachew & Palm, Björn, 2010. "Feasibility study for a standalone solar-wind-based hybrid energy system for application in Ethiopia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(2), pages 487-495, February.
    3. Rehman, Shafiqur & Mahbub Alam, Md. & Meyer, J.P. & Al-Hadhrami, Luai M., 2012. "Feasibility study of a wind–pv–diesel hybrid power system for a village," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 258-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. William López-Castrillón & Héctor H. Sepúlveda & Cristian Mattar, 2021. "Off-Grid Hybrid Electrical Generation Systems in Remote Communities: Trends and Characteristics in Sustainability Solutions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, May.
    2. Yilmaz, Saban & Dincer, Furkan, 2017. "Optimal design of hybrid PV-Diesel-Battery systems for isolated lands: A case study for Kilis, Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 344-352.
    3. Fazelpour, Farivar & Soltani, Nima & Rosen, Marc A., 2014. "Feasibility of satisfying electrical energy needs with hybrid systems for a medium-size hotel on Kish Island, Iran," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 856-865.
    4. Akikur, R.K. & Saidur, R. & Ping, H.W. & Ullah, K.R., 2013. "Comparative study of stand-alone and hybrid solar energy systems suitable for off-grid rural electrification: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 738-752.
    5. Das, Barun K. & Hoque, Najmul & Mandal, Soumya & Pal, Tapas Kumar & Raihan, Md Abu, 2017. "A techno-economic feasibility of a stand-alone hybrid power generation for remote area application in Bangladesh," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 775-788.
    6. Goel, Sonali & Sharma, Renu, 2017. "Performance evaluation of stand alone, grid connected and hybrid renewable energy systems for rural application: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 1378-1389.
    7. Gonzalez, Arnau & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Esteban, Bernat & Rius, Antoni, 2018. "Environmental and cost optimal design of a biomass–Wind–PV electricity generation system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 420-430.
    8. Abdelkader, Abbassi & Rabeh, Abbassi & Mohamed Ali, Dami & Mohamed, Jemli, 2018. "Multi-objective genetic algorithm based sizing optimization of a stand-alone wind/PV power supply system with enhanced battery/supercapacitor hybrid energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 351-363.
    9. Bahramara, S. & Moghaddam, M. Parsa & Haghifam, M.R., 2016. "Optimal planning of hybrid renewable energy systems using HOMER: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 609-620.
    10. González, Arnau & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Rius, Antoni, 2016. "Combined heat and power design based on environmental and cost criteria," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 922-932.
    11. Abedini, Mohammad & Moradi, Mohammad H. & Hosseinian, S. Mahdi, 2016. "Optimal management of microgrids including renewable energy scources using GPSO-GM algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 430-439.
    12. González, Arnau & Riba, Jordi-Roger & Rius, Antoni & Puig, Rita, 2015. "Optimal sizing of a hybrid grid-connected photovoltaic and wind power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 752-762.
    13. Li, Chong & Ge, Xinfeng & Zheng, Yuan & Xu, Chang & Ren, Yan & Song, Chenguang & Yang, Chunxia, 2013. "Techno-economic feasibility study of autonomous hybrid wind/PV/battery power system for a household in Urumqi, China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 263-272.
    14. Zizzo, G. & Beccali, M. & Bonomolo, M. & Di Pietra, B. & Ippolito, M.G. & La Cascia, D. & Leone, G. & Lo Brano, V. & Monteleone, F., 2017. "A feasibility study of some DSM enabling solutions in small islands: The case of Lampedusa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1030-1046.
    15. Nor, Khalid Mohamed & Shaaban, Mohamed & Abdul Rahman, Hasimah, 2014. "Feasibility assessment of wind energy resources in Malaysia based on NWP models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 147-154.
    16. Al Busaidi, Ahmed Said & Kazem, Hussein A & Al-Badi, Abdullah H & Farooq Khan, Mohammad, 2016. "A review of optimum sizing of hybrid PV–Wind renewable energy systems in oman," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 185-193.
    17. Qolipour, Mojtaba & Mostafaeipour, Ali & Tousi, Omid Mohseni, 2017. "Techno-economic feasibility of a photovoltaic-wind power plant construction for electric and hydrogen production: A case study," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 113-123.
    18. Hiendro, Ayong & Kurnianto, Rudi & Rajagukguk, Managam & Simanjuntak, Yohannes M. & Junaidi,, 2013. "Techno-economic analysis of photovoltaic/wind hybrid system for onshore/remote area in Indonesia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 652-657.
    19. Rezzouk, H. & Mellit, A., 2015. "Feasibility study and sensitivity analysis of a stand-alone photovoltaic–diesel–battery hybrid energy system in the north of Algeria," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1134-1150.
    20. Mudasser, Muhammad & Yiridoe, Emmanuel K. & Corscadden, Kenneth, 2015. "Cost-benefit analysis of grid-connected wind–biogas hybrid energy production, by turbine capacity and site," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 573-582.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:epw:ejeng0:v:4:y:2019:i:1:id:61096. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://eu-opensci.org/index.php/ejeng .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.