"Ancient and Backward or Long-Lived and Sustainable?" The Role of the Past in Debates Concerning Rural Livelihoods and Resource Conservation in Eastern Africa
Summary Attempts by external agencies to intervene in the operation of local resource exploitation strategies frequently include reference to historical arguments. These vary in accuracy and sophistication but are nevertheless rhetorically useful since discussions of economic or environmental sustainability or degradation are substantially strengthened by historical comparisons and precedents. Focussing on examples of indigenous intensive agriculture in eastern Africa, this paper agues that relevant evidence of this sort is often unavailable or far from unambiguous. It is therefore necessary to be critical of the ways in which perceptions of the past are invoked within these discourses, and to be aware of the strengths and weaknesses of historical arguments in this regard.
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Jules Siedenburg, 2006. "The Machakos Case Study: Solid Outcomes, Unhelpful Hyperbole," Development Policy Review, Overseas Development Institute, vol. 24(1), pages 75-85, 01.
- Brush, Stephen B., 2007. "Farmers' Rights and Protection of Traditional Agricultural Knowledge," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 35(9), pages 1499-1514, September.
- Rocheleau, Dianne E. & Steinberg, Philip E. & Benjamin, Patricia A., 1995. "Environment, development, crisis, and crusade: Ukambani, Kenya, 1890-1990," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 1037-1051, June.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:38:y:2010:i:9:p:1251-1262. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.