Author
Listed:
- Yin, Yanhong
- Huang, Li'ao
- Han, Qiuyan
Abstract
Based on the capability approach and social model of disability, this study develops an Elderly Mobility Index (EMI) to evaluate elderly mobility across four dimensions: individual capability, environmental accessibility, technological support, and social support. Using data from 782 elderly individuals in Zhejiang Province and employing entropy weighting, principal component analysis, and regression analysis, the study reveals significant urban-rural disparities. Rural elderly scored 10.30 points lower than urban elderly, with rural elderly women being the most disadvantaged group. A key finding is the “high weight-low performance” contradiction in the technology dimension, where technological support shows low practical performance despite high weighting. EMI demonstrates strong predictive validity through significant correlations with both travel frequency and travel satisfaction. However, the conversion from EMI to travel behavior remains unaffected by urban-rural differences, revealing a dual mechanism of EMI formation and activation. This mechanism operates as a transition mechanism that distinguishes capacity building from capacity utilization. It clarifies how incremental policy interventions move systems from latent capacity to effective mobility outcomes. This breaks through traditional linear “capacity-behavior” assumptions in elderly mobility research. The study proposes a three-layer adaptive governance framework that operationalizes the transition mechanism through EMI monitoring, policy calibration, and performance evaluation. This enables dynamic resource allocation between capacity-building and capacity-utilization interventions. Key policy recommendations follow two pathways: capacity-building interventions target formation deficits through urban-rural infrastructure equalization and education-income mechanisms, while capacity-utilization interventions address activation barriers through unified technology support. Specific measures include mandatory age-friendly certification and intergenerational mentorship programs. The framework offers cross-cultural adaptability while maintaining methodological consistency, promoting inclusive transportation for aging populations worldwide.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.