IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v179y2026ics0967070x26000132.html

Inclusive transportation for an aging society: Diagnosing multidimensional capability gaps and proposing tiered policy responses using the elderly mobility index

Author

Listed:
  • Yin, Yanhong
  • Huang, Li'ao
  • Han, Qiuyan

Abstract

Based on the capability approach and social model of disability, this study develops an Elderly Mobility Index (EMI) to evaluate elderly mobility across four dimensions: individual capability, environmental accessibility, technological support, and social support. Using data from 782 elderly individuals in Zhejiang Province and employing entropy weighting, principal component analysis, and regression analysis, the study reveals significant urban-rural disparities. Rural elderly scored 10.30 points lower than urban elderly, with rural elderly women being the most disadvantaged group. A key finding is the “high weight-low performance” contradiction in the technology dimension, where technological support shows low practical performance despite high weighting. EMI demonstrates strong predictive validity through significant correlations with both travel frequency and travel satisfaction. However, the conversion from EMI to travel behavior remains unaffected by urban-rural differences, revealing a dual mechanism of EMI formation and activation. This mechanism operates as a transition mechanism that distinguishes capacity building from capacity utilization. It clarifies how incremental policy interventions move systems from latent capacity to effective mobility outcomes. This breaks through traditional linear “capacity-behavior” assumptions in elderly mobility research. The study proposes a three-layer adaptive governance framework that operationalizes the transition mechanism through EMI monitoring, policy calibration, and performance evaluation. This enables dynamic resource allocation between capacity-building and capacity-utilization interventions. Key policy recommendations follow two pathways: capacity-building interventions target formation deficits through urban-rural infrastructure equalization and education-income mechanisms, while capacity-utilization interventions address activation barriers through unified technology support. Specific measures include mandatory age-friendly certification and intergenerational mentorship programs. The framework offers cross-cultural adaptability while maintaining methodological consistency, promoting inclusive transportation for aging populations worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Yin, Yanhong & Huang, Li'ao & Han, Qiuyan, 2026. "Inclusive transportation for an aging society: Diagnosing multidimensional capability gaps and proposing tiered policy responses using the elderly mobility index," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000132
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X26000132
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. KM Atikur Rahman & Md. Abu Naim Shorkar, 2021. "Analyzing Association Between Public Green Space and Self-Esteem Linked to Social Acceptance for Elderly Population in Dhaka," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, October.
    2. Dong Lin & Jianqiang Cui, 2021. "Transport and Mobility Needs for an Ageing Society from a Policy Perspective: Review and Implications," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-16, November.
    3. Alexander Seifert & Shelia R Cotten & Bo Xie & Deborah Carr, 2021. "A Double Burden of Exclusion? Digital and Social Exclusion of Older Adults in Times of COVID-19 [Attitudes towards and limitations to ICT use in assisted and independent living communities: Findings from a specially-designed technological interven," The Journals of Gerontology: Series B, The Gerontological Society of America, vol. 76(3), pages 99-103.
    4. Metz, D. H., 2000. "Mobility of older people and their quality of life," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 149-152, April.
    5. Baig, Farrukh & Zhang, Dong & Lee, Jaeyoung & Xu, Hongda, 2022. "Shaping inclusiveness of a transportation system: Factors affecting seat-yielding behavior of university students in public transportation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 79-94.
    6. Gu, Jiafeng, 2024. "Determinants of public transportation disability among older adults in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 71-79.
    7. Karen Lucas & Bert Wee & Kees Maat, 2016. "A method to evaluate equitable accessibility: combining ethical theories and accessibility-based approaches," Transportation, Springer, vol. 43(3), pages 473-490, May.
    8. Mark Gorman & Sion Jones & Jeffrey Turner, 2019. "Older People, Mobility and Transport in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Review of the Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-15, November.
    9. Lucas, Karen, 2012. "Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 105-113.
    10. Cheng, Long & Chen, Xuewu & Yang, Shuo & Cao, Zhan & De Vos, Jonas & Witlox, Frank, 2019. "Active travel for active ageing in China: The role of built environment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 142-152.
    11. Sonja Haustein, 2012. "Mobility behavior of the elderly: an attitude-based segmentation approach for a heterogeneous target group," Transportation, Springer, vol. 39(6), pages 1079-1103, November.
    12. Yang Zhou & Quan Yuan & Chao Yang, 2020. "Transport for the Elderly: Activity Patterns, Mode Choices, and Spatiotemporal Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Mélanie Levasseur & Daniel Naud & Jean-François Bruneau & Mélissa Généreux, 2020. "Environmental Characteristics Associated with Older Adults’ Social Participation: The Contribution of Sociodemography and Transportation in Metropolitan, Urban, and Rural Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-15, November.
    14. Banister, David, 2008. "The sustainable mobility paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 73-80, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Villena-Sanchez, Jessica & Boschmann, E. Eric & Avila-Forcada, Sara, 2022. "Daily travel behaviors and transport mode choice of older adults in Mexico City," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    3. Ryan, Jean & Martens, Karel, 2023. "Defining and implementing a sufficient level of accessibility: What’s stopping us?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    4. Shi, Yuji & Blainey, Simon & Sun, Chao & Jing, Peng, 2020. "A literature review on accessibility using bibliometric analysis techniques," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Barboza, Matheus H.C. & Carneiro, Mariana S. & Falavigna, Claudio & Luz, Gregório & Orrico, Romulo, 2021. "Balancing time: Using a new accessibility measure in Rio de Janeiro," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    6. He, Sylvia Y. & Cheung, Yannie H.Y. & Tao, Sui, 2018. "Travel mobility and social participation among older people in a transit metropolis: A socio-spatial-temporal perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 608-626.
    7. Lopes, André & Moura, Filipe & Vale, David, 2025. "The effects of bike-sharing-transit integration on accessibility equity," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    8. Ma, Jingwen & Zhao, Shengchuan & Li, Wu & Liu, Meng & Luo, Huanhuan, 2022. "Heterogeneity in seniors' unmet walking needs: A latent class analysis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    9. Boisjoly, Geneviève & Serra, Bernardo & Oliveira, Gabriel T. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2020. "Accessibility measurements in São Paulo, Rio de Janeiro, Curitiba and Recife, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    10. Tammaru, Tiit & Sevtsuk, Andres & Witlox, Frank, 2023. "Towards an equity-centred model of sustainable mobility: Integrating inequality and segregation challenges in the green mobility transition," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    11. Ariyanti, Octaviani & Sampaio, Dora & Bailey, Ajay, 2025. "Barriers and facilitators to urban mobility for older adults in LMICs: A scoping review," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    12. José Renato Barandier & Milena Bodmer & Izabella Lentino, 2017. "Evidence of the impacts of the national housing programme on the accessibility of the low‐income population in Rio de Janeiro," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(2), pages 105-118, May.
    13. Vincenzo Auriemma & Luisa Nardi, 2025. "New models of sustainable mobility in Smart Cities," Academicus International Scientific Journal, Entrepreneurship Training Center Albania, issue 32, pages 84-101, July.
    14. Yang, Yongjiang & Sasaki, Kuniaki & Cheng, Long & Tao, Sui, 2022. "Does the built environment matter for active travel among older adults: Insights from Chiba City, Japan," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    15. Paweł Pistelok & Daniel Štraub, 2021. "Evaluation of the Road Policy in the Light of Vision Zero in Jaworzno, Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-20, August.
    16. Knierim, Lukas & Schlüter, Jan Christian, 2021. "The attitude of potentially less mobile people towards demand responsive transport in a rural area in central Germany," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Ning, Yihong & Deng, Songyuan & Chen, Yuche, 2025. "Navigating barriers: examining social equality through transportation disadvantages and perceived healthcare accessibility in South Carolina," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    18. Kandt, Jens & Leak, Alistair, 2019. "Examining inclusive mobility through smartcard data: What shall we make of senior citizens' declining bus patronage in the West Midlands?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    19. repec:osf:socarx:h5scf_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    20. Chen, Chialin & Achtari, Guyves & Majkut, Kevin & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, 2017. "Balancing equity and cost in rural transportation management with multi-objective utility analysis and data envelopment analysis: A case of Quinte West," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 148-165.
    21. Freiberg, Germán & Giannotti, Mariana & Bittencourt, Taina A., 2024. "Are mass transit projects and public transport planning overlooking uneven distributional effects? Empirical evidence from Sao Paulo, Brazil," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x26000132. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.