IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Using a Hicksian approach to cost-benefit analysis in discrete choice: An empirical analysis of a transportation corridor simulation model

Listed author(s):
  • Hau, Timothy D.
Registered author(s):

    The general equilibrium effects of alternative transportation policy proposals are analyzed using a multi-modal, benefit-cost model of demand and supply within a discrete choice framework. Using the expenditure function as an empirical construct yields Hicksian consumer's surplus measures, which are usually not directly observable. Despite the absence of data on the complete budget and only mode choice data, the procedure we use to prove the stochastic analog of Roy's Identity identifies the entire indirect utility function, and hence the explicit expenditure function. The model is applied to a corridor simulation model of Interstate 580 of the San Francisco Bay Area. Travel demand is calibrated using multinomial logit on a sample of work-trip commuters. Detailed modal costs are estimated and entered as parameters of the demand model. The Scarf algorithm equilibrates the analytic disaggregated demand model and a parallel analytic supply model. Our forecast is based on a synthetic sample of households generated by an efficient program that uses census data. The benefits of policy alternatives, such as marginal (resource) cost pricing are computed and discussed.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Transportation Research Part B: Methodological.

    Volume (Year): 21 (1987)
    Issue (Month): 5 (October)
    Pages: 339-357

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:21:y:1987:i:5:p:339-357
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:21:y:1987:i:5:p:339-357. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.