IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v96y2017icp54-63.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On the complexity of finishing a crossing on time: Elderly pedestrians, timing and cycling infrastructure

Author

Listed:
  • Lachapelle, Ugo
  • Cloutier, Marie-Soleil

Abstract

Aging population and reductions in car use by seniors have the potential to increase active transportation rates. While there are associated health benefits to this potential shift, there are also higher risks for elderly pedestrian injuries, especially at street crossings. This naturalistic study compares street crossing behaviors of different population age groups in large Québec cities through observational data, situational characteristics and environmental characteristics of location. We assess if observed crossings could be completed safely within the allocated time. Street crossing observations on 2073 pedestrians was gathered at 135 signalized crossings during a four-month period in the summer of 2013. Mixed effect logit models are used to assess the individual, contextual, behavioral and environmental correlates of street crossing ending. Differences in age groups and other correlates are assessed for their association with the type of street crossing ending (on red light, on red hand or on both). In multivariate models, older age did not have an impact on finishing crossing on time, but many factors associated with older age were: having a walking aid, hesitating, and slowing down mid-crossing. Longer “white man silhouette” timing was also associated with reduced odds ratio of failing to finish crossing on time. The presence of cycling infrastructure increased those odds. Without walking, many elders will experience decreasing level of access. In neighborhoods with high concentrations of elderly populations, providing shorten crossing distance or longer crossing timing, may increase the convenience of walking for elderly populations. Longer signal timing may also be warranted in locations where cycling infrastructures were added to account for the increased level of difficulty.

Suggested Citation

  • Lachapelle, Ugo & Cloutier, Marie-Soleil, 2017. "On the complexity of finishing a crossing on time: Elderly pedestrians, timing and cycling infrastructure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 54-63.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:96:y:2017:i:c:p:54-63
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856416300969
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2016.12.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cloutier, Marie-Soleil & Tremblay, Mathieu & Morency, Patrick & Apparicio, Philippe, 2014. "Carrefours en milieu urbain : quels risques pour les piétons ? Exemple empirique des quartiers centraux de Montréal, Canada," Recherche Transports Sécurité, Editions NecPlus, vol. 2014(01), pages 3-20, March.
    2. G. Yannis & E. Papadimitriou & A. Theofilatos, 2013. "Pedestrian gap acceptance for mid-block street crossing," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(5), pages 450-462, July.
    3. Keegan, Owen & O'Mahony, Margaret, 2003. "Modifying pedestrian behaviour," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(10), pages 889-901, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhan Lv & Ningcheng Wang & Shenjun Yao & Jianping Wu & Lei Fang, 2021. "Towards Healthy Aging: Influence of the Built Environment on Elderly Pedestrian Safety at the Micro-Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Miwa, Tomio & Wang, Jianbiao & Morikawa, Takayuki, 2023. "Are seniors in mountainous areas able to realize their desired trips? A novel approach to estimate trip demand," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    3. Adriana Ortegon-Sanchez & Rosemary R. C. McEachan & Alexandra Albert & Chris Cartwright & Nicola Christie & Ashley Dhanani & Shahid Islam & Marcella Ucci & Laura Vaughan, 2021. "Measuring the Built Environment in Studies of Child Health—A Meta-Narrative Review of Associations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-34, October.
    4. Ren, Xiangxia & Zhang, Jun & Song, Weiguo & Cao, Shuchao, 2021. "Mechanisms of passing through short exits for the elderly and young adults," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 195-213.
    5. Collins, Patricia A. & MacFarlane, Robert, 2018. "Evaluating the determinants of switching to public transit in an automobile-oriented mid-sized Canadian city: A longitudinal analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 682-695.
    6. Zhihong Li & Zinan Wang & Yanjie Wen & Li Zhao, 2022. "Exploration and Prediction of the Elderly Travel Behavior Based on a Novel GR-GA-BP Hybrid Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wafaa Saleh & Monika Grigorova & Samia Elattar, 2020. "Pedestrian Road Crossing at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Locations: Does the Refuge Island Increase Risk?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Rahul, T.M. & Manoj, M., 2020. "Categorization of pedestrian level of service perceptions and accounting its response heterogeneity and latent correlation on travel decisions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 40-55.
    3. Jiaming Shi & Changxu Wu & Xiuying Qian, 2020. "The Effects of Multiple Factors on Elderly Pedestrians’ Speed Perception and Stopping Distance Estimation of Approaching Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, June.
    4. Kun Wang & Liang Xu & Han Jiang, 2022. "Analysis of the Effect of Human-Machine Co-Driving Vehicle on Pedestrian Crossing Speed at Uncontrolled Mid-Block Road Sections: A VR-Based Case Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-12, June.
    5. Yang, Jianguo & Deng, Wen & Wang, Jinmei & Li, Qingfeng & Wang, Zhaoan, 2006. "Modeling pedestrians' road crossing behavior in traffic system micro-simulation in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 280-290, March.
    6. Chen, Qun & Wang, Yan, 2015. "Cellular automata (CA) simulation of the interaction of vehicle flows and pedestrian crossings on urban low-grade uncontrolled roads," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 432(C), pages 43-57.
    7. Nam Seok Kim & Seung Sub Yoon & Donghyung Yook, 2017. "Performance comparison between pedestrian push-button and pre-timed pedestrian crossings at midblock: a Korean case study," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(6), pages 706-721, August.
    8. Arshad Jamal & Muhammad Ijaz & Meshal Almosageah & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi & Muhammad Zahid & Irfan Ullah & Rabia Emhamed Al Mamlook, 2022. "Implementing the Maximum Likelihood Method for Critical Gap Estimation under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Li, Baibing, 2014. "A bilevel model for multivariate risk analysis of pedestrians’ crossing behavior at signalized intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 18-30.
    10. Nadine Schuurman & Blake Byron Walker & David Swanlund & Ofer Amram & Natalie L. Yanchar, 2020. "Qualitative Field Observation of Pedestrian Injury Hotspots: A Mixed-Methods Approach for Developing Built- and Socioeconomic-Environmental Risk Signatures," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-15, March.
    11. Ali SOLTANI & Samaneh MOZAYENI, 2013. "Factors Affecting The Citizen’S Trends To Use The Pedestrian Bridges In Iran," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 5(4), pages 5-18, December.
    12. Frei, Fernando, 2006. "Sampling mobility index: Case study in Assis--Brazil," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 40(9), pages 792-799, November.
    13. Savvas Emmanouilidis & Socrates Basbas & Alexandros Sdoukopoulos & Ioannis Politis, 2022. "Settlements along Main Road Axes: Blessing or Curse? Evaluating the Barrier Effect in a Small Greek Settlement," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-20, December.
    14. Yu, Chunhui & Ma, Wanjing & Lo, Hong K. & Yang, Xiaoguang, 2015. "Optimization of mid-block pedestrian crossing network with discrete demands," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 103-121.
    15. Wang, Yan & Peng, Zhongyi & Chen, Qun, 2018. "Simulated interactions of pedestrian crossings and motorized vehicles in residential areas," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 490(C), pages 1046-1060.
    16. Li, Baibing, 2013. "A model of pedestrians’ intended waiting times for street crossings at signalized intersections," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 17-28.
    17. Anastasiadou, K. & Vougias, S., 2019. "“Smart” or “sustainably smart” urban road networks? The most important commercial street in Thessaloniki as a case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 18-25.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:96:y:2017:i:c:p:54-63. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.