IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/touman/v39y2013icp50-61.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Crossborder cooperation in transboundary conservation-development initiatives in southern Africa: The role of borders of the mind

Author

Listed:
  • Chaderopa, Chengeto

Abstract

Transboundary Protected Areas (TBPAs) are often characterised as a viable strategy in facilitating the participation of crossborder communities in crossborder nature-based tourism business partnerships. In southern Africa, the introduction of these expansive initiatives has however, not resulted in such developments. Extant attempts to investigate the reasons for this gap are dominated by a focus on the adequacy or otherwise, of physical infrastructural facilities that are usually deemed crucial to achieving successful crossborder cooperation. Useful as this approach is, its robustness is questionable especially because it seems wholly inspired by a conceptualisation of borders as essentially physical entities. However, there is a growing body of literature that subscribes to the idea that borders exist both in space and mind. In this context, through qualitative in-depth personal interviews, this study scrutinizes the Makuleke Community's border narratives and experiences to determine the extent to which interiorised cognitive borders are implicated in the manner in which they approach the idea of forging crossborder tourism business partnerships with their regional counterparts. One major finding is that there are significant cognitive barriers to cross-boundary cooperation. The study recommends the institutionalisation of diverse spatial socialisation programmes to build trust, social capital and intercultural awareness to encourage crossborder communities to exhibit approach rather than avoidance behaviour towards each other.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaderopa, Chengeto, 2013. "Crossborder cooperation in transboundary conservation-development initiatives in southern Africa: The role of borders of the mind," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 50-61.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:touman:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:50-61
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tourman.2013.04.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0261517713000903
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.04.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Borders, Border Regions and Territoriality: Contradictory Meanings, Changing Significance," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 593-604.
    2. Henk Van Houtum & Ton Van Naerssen, 2002. "Bordering, Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(2), pages 125-136, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Junjun Niu & Chunmei Mao, 2023. "The Policy Evolution Characteristics of Regional Integration Development in the Yangtze River Delta: A Quantitative Analysis Based on Policy Texts from 2003 to 2022," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Yuewei Wang & Mengmeng Xi & Hang Chen & Xinyang Wu, 2022. "A social network analysis of tourism cooperation in the Yangtze River Delta: A supply and demand perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Wenwu Du & Sofia M. Penabaz-Wiley & Anthony Murithi Njeru & Isami Kinoshita, 2015. "Models and Approaches for Integrating Protected Areas with Their Surroundings: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, June.
    4. Yuewei Wang & Hang Chen & Xinyang Wu, 2021. "Spatial Structure Characteristics of Tourist Attraction Cooperation Networks in the Yangtze River Delta Based on Tourism Flow," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huib Ernste & Henk Van Houtum & Annelies Zoomers, 2009. "Trans‐World: Debating The Place And Borders Of Places In The Age Of Transnationalism," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(5), pages 577-586, December.
    2. Fricke, Carola, 2014. "Grenzüberschreitende Governance in der Raumplanung: Organisations- und Kooperationsformen in Basel und Lille," Arbeitsberichte der ARL: Aufsätze, in: Grotheer, Swantje & Schwöbel, Arne & Stepper, Martina (ed.), Nimm's sportlich - Planung als Hindernislauf, volume 10, pages 62-78, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft.
    3. Leandro Francisco José, 2019. "The Mesmerizing Journey from Gyeongju to Lisbon: The BRI as a Mechanism of De-bordering, Re-bordering, and Co-bordering," TalTech Journal of European Studies, Sciendo, vol. 9(2), pages 123-152, September.
    4. A. A. Gritsenko & M. V. Zotova, 2022. "Local Responses to the Contested Border in Northern Crimea," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 589-599, December.
    5. Roberta Capello & Andrea Caragliu & Ugo Fratesi, 2018. "Compensation modes of border effects in cross‐border regions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(4), pages 759-785, September.
    6. Atul Mishra, 2008. "Boundaries and Territoriality in South Asia," International Studies, , vol. 45(2), pages 105-132, April.
    7. Paolo Cuttitta, 2016. "Mandatory Integration Measures and Differential Inclusion: The Italian Case," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-302, February.
    8. James Anderson & Liam O'Dowd, 1999. "Contested Borders: Globalization and Ethnonational Conflict in Ireland," Regional Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 33(7), pages 681-696.
    9. SOHN Christophe & LICHERON Julien, 2015. "From barrier to resource? Modelling the border effects on metropolitan functions in Europe," LISER Working Paper Series 2015-08, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    10. James W. Scott, 2021. "Bordering, Ordering and Everyday Cognitive Geographies," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(1), pages 26-33, February.
    11. Jorde Eduardo Mendoza & Bruno Dupeyron, 2017. "Economic Integration, Emerging Fields and Cross-border Governance: The Case of San Diego–Tijuana," Post-Print halshs-01588578, HAL.
    12. Lundquist, Karl-Johan & Trippl, Michaela, 2009. "Towards Cross-Border Innovation Spaces. A theoretical analysis and empirical comparison of the Öresund region and the Centrope area," SRE-Discussion Papers 2009/05, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    13. SOHN Christophe & CHRISTOPOULOS Dimitris & KOSKINEN Johan, 2013. "Geography and social networks. Modelling the effects of territorial borders on policy networks," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-19, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    14. Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    15. Kari Anne Drangsland, 2020. "Bordering through recalibration: Exploring the temporality of the German “Ausbildungsduldungâ€," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 1128-1145, September.
    16. Annelies van Uden & Henk van Houtum, 2020. "Beyond Coronativism: The Need For Agape," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 333-346, July.
    17. Sanjay K. Bhardwaj, 2013. "India–Bangladesh Border Governance," International Studies, , vol. 50(1-2), pages 109-129, January.
    18. Bastian A. Vollmer, 2021. "Categories, Practices and the Self – Reflections on Bordering, Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(1), pages 4-10, February.
    19. Kaiping Jiang & Kaichao Li & Nan Cong & Siyu Wu & Fei Peng, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Variation Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Resilience in Border Cities of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
    20. Scherhag, Daniela, 2008. "Europäische Grenzraumforschung," E-Paper der ARL, ARL – Akademie für Raumentwicklung in der Leibniz-Gemeinschaft, volume 2, number 2.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:touman:v:39:y:2013:i:c:p:50-61. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/tourism-management .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.