IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/spr/rrorus/v12y2022i4d10.1134_s2079970522700150.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Local Responses to the Contested Border in Northern Crimea

Author

Listed:
  • A. A. Gritsenko

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

  • M. V. Zotova

    (Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences)

Abstract

— This article analyses the situation in Crimea, which de facto seceded from Ukraine and joined Russia in 2014 following a local referendum, the results of which are not recognised by the international community. It focuses on the everyday life of the local population, which has been forced to adapt to the emergence of the contested border between Russia and Ukraine; the related breakdown of political and economic interactions between Crimea and Ukraine; and the region’s transition to new geopolitical, economic, and legal conditions. Based on field research, expert interviews, and six focus groups in two small border cities of Northern Crimea, we specifically address the meaning of the de facto border for local residents. By considering perceptions of Ukraine and its regional neighbours, cross-border practices, and social relations, we discuss how people assess these changes and view the border. Our research, firstly, shows that residents of Northern Crimea attach great importance to the protective function of the new border. Echoing mainstream Russian media, they portray Ukraine as a hostile state that threatens Crimeans. Secondly, the residents claim that the emergence of the border has given people hope for improved living standards and well-being. Despite the still-ambiguous balance of costs and benefits in border cities, the local residents are overwhelmingly pro-Russian and expect Russia’s support in the future. Thirdly, for Crimean residents, the border has also become a significant obstacle to communication with those in Ukraine. Neighbours across the border are not yet perceived as “other.” In this sense, Crimean residents do not accept the border and would like to see Crimea and Ukraine once again united.

Suggested Citation

  • A. A. Gritsenko & M. V. Zotova, 2022. "Local Responses to the Contested Border in Northern Crimea," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 12(4), pages 589-599, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:12:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970522700150
    DOI: 10.1134/S2079970522700150
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1134/S2079970522700150
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1134/S2079970522700150?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bianca Szytniewski & Bas Spierings, 2014. "Encounters with Otherness: Implications of (Un)familiarity for Daily Life in Borderlands," Journal of Borderlands Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 339-351, September.
    2. Henk Van Houtum & Ton Van Naerssen, 2002. "Bordering, Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 93(2), pages 125-136, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huib Ernste & Henk Van Houtum & Annelies Zoomers, 2009. "Trans‐World: Debating The Place And Borders Of Places In The Age Of Transnationalism," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(5), pages 577-586, December.
    2. Monika Bauhr & Nicholas Charron, 2024. "Europe around the corner? How border proximity and quality of government explains European identity," European Union Politics, , vol. 25(2), pages 376-395, June.
    3. Paolo Cuttitta, 2016. "Mandatory Integration Measures and Differential Inclusion: The Italian Case," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 289-302, February.
    4. James W. Scott, 2021. "Bordering, Ordering and Everyday Cognitive Geographies," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(1), pages 26-33, February.
    5. SOHN Christophe & CHRISTOPOULOS Dimitris & KOSKINEN Johan, 2013. "Geography and social networks. Modelling the effects of territorial borders on policy networks," LISER Working Paper Series 2013-19, Luxembourg Institute of Socio-Economic Research (LISER).
    6. Barbara Demeterova & Tatjana Fischer & Jürgen Schmude, 2020. "The Right to Not Catch Up—Transitioning European Territorial Cohesion towards Spatial Justice for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-26, June.
    7. Kari Anne Drangsland, 2020. "Bordering through recalibration: Exploring the temporality of the German “Ausbildungsduldungâ€," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 38(6), pages 1128-1145, September.
    8. Annelies van Uden & Henk van Houtum, 2020. "Beyond Coronativism: The Need For Agape," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 333-346, July.
    9. Bastian A. Vollmer, 2021. "Categories, Practices and the Self – Reflections on Bordering, Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(1), pages 4-10, February.
    10. Kaiping Jiang & Kaichao Li & Nan Cong & Siyu Wu & Fei Peng, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Variation Characteristics and Obstacle Factors of Resilience in Border Cities of Northeast China," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-19, April.
    11. Ruben Gielis, 2009. "Borders Make The Difference: Migrant Transnationalism As A Border Experience," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 100(5), pages 598-609, December.
    12. Qianlong Bie & Cansong Li & Shangyi Zhou, 2014. "Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Border Policies in Dehong Prefecture of Yunnan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-16, August.
    13. Christophe Sohn, 2014. "The Border as a Resource in the Global Urban Space: A Contribution to the Cross-Border Metropolis Hypothesis," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 38(5), pages 1697-1711, September.
    14. Chansoo Park & Young-Rae Kim & Jihwan Yeon, 2023. "Stronger together: International tourists “spillover†into close countries," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(5), pages 1204-1224, August.
    15. Henk van Houtum, 2021. "Beyond ‘Borderism’: Overcoming Discriminative B/Ordering and Othering," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 112(1), pages 34-43, February.
    16. Bakhtiari, Fatemeh & Jacobsen, Jette Bredahl & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & Lundhede, Thomas Hedemark & Strange, Niels & Boman, Mattias, 2018. "Disentangling Distance and Country Effects on the Value of Conservation across National Borders," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 11-20.
    17. Harshavardhan Jatkar, 2024. "Subaltern Politics at Urban Borderlands," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9.
    18. Bianca B. Szytniewski & Bas Spierings, 2018. "Place Image Formation and Cross‐Border Shopping: German Shoppers in the Polish Bazaar in Słubice," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 109(2), pages 295-308, April.
    19. Covadonga Bachiller López, 2023. "Border policing at sea: Tactics, routines, and the law in a Frontex patrol boat," The British Journal of Criminology, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, vol. 63(1), pages 1-17.
    20. Sendirella George & Erin Twyford & Farzana Aman Tanima, 2024. "Authoritarian Neoliberalism and Asylum Seekers: the Silencing of Accounting and Accountability in Offshore Detention Centres," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 194(4), pages 861-885, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:rrorus:v:12:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1134_s2079970522700150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.