IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v82y2012i2p117-130.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple merger gene genealogies in two species: Monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly for two examples of Lambda coalescents

Author

Listed:
  • Eldon, Bjarki
  • Degnan, James H.

Abstract

Probabilities of monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly of two-species gene genealogies are computed for modest sample sizes and compared for two different Λ coalescent processes. Coalescent processes belonging to the Λ coalescent family admit asynchronous multiple mergers of active ancestral lineages. Assigning a timescale to the time of divergence becomes a central issue when different populations have different coalescent processes running on different timescales. Clade probabilities in single populations are also computed, which can be useful for testing for taxonomic distinctiveness of an observed set of monophyletic lineages. The coalescence rates of multiple merger coalescent processes are functions of coalescent parameters. The effect of coalescent parameters on the probabilities studied depends on the coalescent process, and if the population is ancestral or derived. The probability of reciprocal monophyly tends to be somewhat lower, when associated with a Λ coalescent, under the null hypothesis that two groups come from the same population. However, even for fairly recent divergence times, the probability of monophyly tends to be higher as a function of the number of generations for coalescent processes that admit multiple mergers, and is sensitive to the parameter of one of the example processes.

Suggested Citation

  • Eldon, Bjarki & Degnan, James H., 2012. "Multiple merger gene genealogies in two species: Monophyly, paraphyly, and polyphyly for two examples of Lambda coalescents," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 82(2), pages 117-130.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:82:y:2012:i:2:p:117-130
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2012.05.001
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580912000500
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2012.05.001?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eldon, Bjarki, 2011. "Estimation of parameters in large offspring number models and ratios of coalescence times," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 16-28.
    2. Eldon, Bjarki, 2009. "Structured coalescent processes from a modified Moran model with large offspring numbers," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 92-104.
    3. Schweinsberg, Jason, 2003. "Coalescent processes obtained from supercritical Galton-Watson processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 106(1), pages 107-139, July.
    4. Zhu, Sha & Degnan, James H. & Steel, Mike, 2011. "Clades, clans, and reciprocal monophyly under neutral evolutionary models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 220-227.
    5. Sargsyan, Ori & Wakeley, John, 2008. "A coalescent process with simultaneous multiple mergers for approximating the gene genealogies of many marine organisms," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 104-114.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eldon, Bjarki, 2011. "Estimation of parameters in large offspring number models and ratios of coalescence times," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 16-28.
    2. Blath, Jochen & Cronjäger, Mathias Christensen & Eldon, Bjarki & Hammer, Matthias, 2016. "The site-frequency spectrum associated with Ξ-coalescents," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 36-50.
    3. Hobolth, Asger & Siri-Jégousse, Arno & Bladt, Mogens, 2019. "Phase-type distributions in population genetics," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 16-32.
    4. Eldon, Bjarki & Stephan, Wolfgang, 2018. "Evolution of highly fecund haploid populations," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 48-56.
    5. Steinrücken, Matthias & Birkner, Matthias & Blath, Jochen, 2013. "Analysis of DNA sequence variation within marine species using Beta-coalescents," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 15-24.
    6. Etheridge, Alison M. & Griffiths, Robert C. & Taylor, Jesse E., 2010. "A coalescent dual process in a Moran model with genic selection, and the lambda coalescent limit," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 77-92.
    7. Bjarki Eldon, 2023. "Viability Selection at Linked Sites," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-23, January.
    8. Disanto, Filippo & Wiehe, Thomas, 2020. "Measuring the external branches of a Kingman tree: A discrete approach," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 92-105.
    9. Eldon, Bjarki, 2009. "Structured coalescent processes from a modified Moran model with large offspring numbers," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 76(2), pages 92-104.
    10. Dhersin, Jean-Stéphane & Freund, Fabian & Siri-Jégousse, Arno & Yuan, Linglong, 2013. "On the length of an external branch in the Beta-coalescent," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 123(5), pages 1691-1715.
    11. Wu, Taoyang & Choi, Kwok Pui, 2016. "On joint subtree distributions under two evolutionary models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 13-23.
    12. Huillet, Thierry & Möhle, Martin, 2013. "On the extended Moran model and its relation to coalescents with multiple collisions," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 5-14.
    13. Birkner, Matthias & Blath, Jochen & Steinrücken, Matthias, 2011. "Importance sampling for Lambda-coalescents in the infinitely many sites model," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 79(4), pages 155-173.
    14. Der, Ricky & Epstein, Charles L. & Plotkin, Joshua B., 2011. "Generalized population models and the nature of genetic drift," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 80-99.
    15. Hadzibeganovic, Tarik & Liu, Chao & Li, Rong, 2021. "Effects of reproductive skew on the evolution of ethnocentrism in structured populations with variable size," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 568(C).
    16. Durrett, Rick & Schweinsberg, Jason, 2005. "A coalescent model for the effect of advantageous mutations on the genealogy of a population," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 115(10), pages 1628-1657, October.
    17. González Casanova, Adrián & Kurt, Noemi & Wakolbinger, Anton & Yuan, Linglong, 2016. "An individual-based model for the Lenski experiment, and the deceleration of the relative fitness," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 126(8), pages 2211-2252.
    18. Abraham, Romain & Delmas, Jean-François & He, Hui, 2021. "Some properties of stationary continuous state branching processes," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 309-343.
    19. Paul F. Slade, 2018. "Linearization of the Kingman Coalescent," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-27, May.
    20. Freund, Fabian & Siri-Jégousse, Arno, 2021. "The impact of genetic diversity statistics on model selection between coalescents," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:82:y:2012:i:2:p:117-130. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.