IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v49y2025i5s0308596125000345.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Automating spectrum sharing: A bottom-up approach and research agenda

Author

Listed:
  • Lehr, William
  • Berry, Randall
  • Kadota, Igor
  • Caicedo Bastidas, Carlos E.
  • Mu, Kangle
  • Xie, Zongyun
  • Tamim, Irfan

Abstract

Future G networks will require more dynamic, agile support for the management of radio spectrum on a fine-grained basis. The radio access network (RAN) technologies necessary to enable Dynamic Spectrum Access (DSA) have progressed significantly over the past 20 years, but the challenges of realizing the potential for DSA requires the co-evolution of technologies, business models, and regulatory policy. This paper presents a multidisciplinary research effort to develop the building blocks needed to advance DSA. In particular, we focus on the use of standards-based Spectrum Consumption Models (SCMs) and review on-going research to incorporate SCMs in an automated management framework based on incentive-compatible, technically-sound spectrum access contracts referred to as Spectrum Access Agreements (SAAs). This paper introduces the core concepts of the SCM/SAA framework, project goals, and preliminary insights into how the framework can help improve spectrum management. The research on SCM/SAA represents a bottom-up effort to develop the techno-economic building blocks or tools to facilitate market-based experimentation and development of DSA based spectrum sharing markets, business models, and applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Lehr, William & Berry, Randall & Kadota, Igor & Caicedo Bastidas, Carlos E. & Mu, Kangle & Xie, Zongyun & Tamim, Irfan, 2025. "Automating spectrum sharing: A bottom-up approach and research agenda," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:49:y:2025:i:5:s0308596125000345
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102937
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596125000345
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2025.102937?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Matheson, Robert & Morris, Adele C., 2012. "The technical basis for spectrum rights: Policies to enhance market efficiency," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(9), pages 783-792.
    2. Thành Nguyen & Hang Zhou & Randall A. Berry & Michael L. Honig & Rakesh Vohra, 2016. "The Cost of Free Spectrum," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(6), pages 1217-1229, December.
    3. Kangle Mu & Zongyun Xie & Igor Kadota & Randall Berry, 2024. "Impact of Geographical Separation on Spectrum Sharing Markets," Papers 2407.20909, arXiv.org.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Randall Berry & Michael Honig & Thành Nguyen & Vijay Subramanian & Rakesh Vohra, 2020. "The Value of Sharing Intermittent Spectrum," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(11), pages 5242-5264, November.
    2. Antonio NICITA & Maria Alessandra ROSSI, 2013. "Spectrum Crunch vs. Spectrum Sharing:Exploring the 'Authorised Shared Access' Model," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(90), pages 17-40, 2nd quart.
    3. de Vries, J. Pierre, 2013. "Optimizing receiver performance using harm claim thresholds," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 757-771.
    4. Darrah Blackwater & Ilia Murtazashvili & Martin B. H. Weiss, 2024. "Polycentric systems for spectrum management: the case of Indigenous and tribal spectrum sovereignty," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 465-491, June.
    5. Brendan Badia & Randall Berry & Ermin Wei, 2019. "Investment in EV charging spots for parking," Papers 1904.09967, arXiv.org.
    6. Chou, Yuntsai, 2014. "A compensation model developed to liberalize spectrum in the G4 era," 20th ITS Biennial Conference, Rio de Janeiro 2014: The Net and the Internet - Emerging Markets and Policies 106897, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    7. Webb, William & Medeisis, Arturas & Minervini, Leo Fulvio, 2024. "Evolved spectrum usage rights: A catalyst for liberal spectrum management reform," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    8. Chou, Yuntsai & Hu, Weimin & Lien, Hsienming, 2015. "A compensation model developed to increase spectrum usage efficiency in the 4G era," 2015 Regional ITS Conference, Los Angeles 2015 146334, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    9. Gomez, Marcela M. & Weiss, Martin B.H., 2020. "A comprehensive secondary market model for virtualized wireless connectivity," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • O54 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economywide Country Studies - - - Latin America; Caribbean
    • L5 - Industrial Organization - - Regulation and Industrial Policy
    • K2 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law
    • K23 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law
    • L96 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities - - - Telecommunications
    • L82 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Entertainment; Media
    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • P14 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Property Rights
    • Q29 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Other
    • O3 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Innovation; Research and Development; Technological Change; Intellectual Property Rights

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:49:y:2025:i:5:s0308596125000345. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.