IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v82y2025ics0160791x25000910.html

Measurement and evaluation of ecological niche in open innovation ecosystem based on large models

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Hongying
  • Xinyi, Huang
  • Sun, Bing

Abstract

This paper objectively and comprehensively constructs an evaluation index system for the ecological niche of open innovation ecosystem by integrating existing research. We utilize the long short-term memory network in large model methods and based on the idea of suitability model to conduct in-depth analysis of China's publicly available statistical data from 2000 to 2023. A comprehensive calculation and in-depth analysis of the ecological niche of open innovation ecosystem and basic ecological niche in 30 provincial-level administrative regions (excluding Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan and Tibet) are carried out. The research results not only reveal the significant differences in the suitability of innovation ecological niche among different provincial-level administrative regions, but also show the complex relationship between ecological niche suitability and evolutionary momentum, as well as the different characteristics and development trends of each basic ecological niche. Compared to traditional measurement methods, the large model approach adopted in this study demonstrates significant advantages: (1) It is capable of processing massive and complex datasets, capturing the dynamic changes within innovation ecosystems; (2) By utilizing Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, it effectively addresses the vanishing gradient problem inherent in traditional RNN models, thereby enhancing prediction accuracy; (3) In conjunction with fitness models, it provides a more comprehensive assessment of the internal mechanisms and external environmental factors of innovation ecosystems. This research provides important theoretical basis and empirical support for in-depth understanding of the innovation ecosystem in various provincial-level administrative regions of China, and helps to better grasp the pattern and direction of national innovation development and provide a powerful reference for formulating scientific and reasonable innovation policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Hongying & Xinyi, Huang & Sun, Bing, 2025. "Measurement and evaluation of ecological niche in open innovation ecosystem based on large models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000910
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X25000910
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.102901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tindara Abbate & Anna Codini & Barbara Aquilani & Demetris Vrontis, 2022. "From Knowledge Ecosystems to Capabilities Ecosystems: When Open Innovation Digital Platforms Lead to Value Co-creation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 13(1), pages 290-304, March.
    2. Sorri, Krista & Yrjönkoski, Katariina & Seppänen, Marko, 2024. "Smart cities, smarter values: Unpacking the ecosystem of urban innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    3. Xia, Yue & Md Johar, Md Gapar, 2025. "How external factors influence organisational digital innovation: Evidence from China," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    4. Lyu, Yibo & Zhu, Yuqing & Han, Shaojie & He, Binyuan & Bao, Lining, 2020. "Open innovation and innovation "Radicalness"—the moderating effect of network embeddedness," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    5. Sun, Bing & Yang, Xueting & Zhong, Shen & Tian, Shengnan & Liang, Tian, 2024. "How do technology convergence and expansibility affect information technology diffusion? Evidence from the internet of things technology in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Hossain, Mokter, 2022. "The Shenzhen ecosystem: What it means for the western world," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    7. Radziwon, Agnieszka & Bogers, Marcel, 2019. "Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 573-587.
    8. Marcon, Arthur & Ribeiro, José Luis Duarte & Olteanu, Yasmin & Fichter, Klaus, 2024. "How the interplay between innovation ecosystems and market contingency factors impacts startup innovation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    9. Xie, Xuemei & Wang, Hongwei, 2021. "How to bridge the gap between innovation niches and exploratory and exploitative innovations in open innovation ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 299-311.
    10. Wang, Wenyang & Luo, Yuping & Ma, Mingrui & Wang, Jinglin & Sui, Cong, 2025. "A novel forecasting framework leveraging large language model and machine learning for methanol price," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    11. Dody Arfiansyah & Hoon Han & Sisi Zlatanova, 2024. "Land Suitability Analysis for Residential Development in an Ecologically Sensitive Area: A Case Study of Nusantara, the New Indonesian Capital," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-34, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Xiang & Yunhui Ma & Meiling Ji & Yangyang Su, 2024. "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Interconnected Knowledge: Examining the Evolution of Graduate Student Innovation Ecosystems," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 14036-14075, September.
    2. Xie, Xuemei & Yu, Hong, 2025. "Collaborative innovation and knowledge spillovers in open innovation ecosystems: Exploring the roles of network stability and technological niche," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Xiaohang Zhang & Ran Cui & Yajun Ji, 2024. "Exploring Innovation Ecosystem with Multi-Layered Heterogeneous Networks of Global 5G Communication Technology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-28, February.
    4. Zahoor, Nadia & Adomako, Samuel, 2023. "Be open to failure: Open innovation failure in dynamic environments," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    5. Lago, Nicole Cecchele & Marcon, Arthur & Ribeiro, Jose Luis Duarte & Uhr, Daniel de Abreu Pereira & Olteanu, Yasmin & Fichter, Klaus, 2024. "Quantifying the impact of inbound open innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Anna Maria Lis & Marita McPhillips & Adrian Lis, 2020. "Sustainability of Cluster Organizations as Open Innovation Intermediaries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    7. Markovic, Stefan & Koporcic, Nikolina & Arslanagic-Kalajdzic, Maja & Kadic-Maglajlic, Selma & Bagherzadeh, Mehdi & Islam, Nazrul, 2021. "Business-to-business open innovation: COVID-19 lessons for small and medium-sized enterprises from emerging markets," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    8. Xian Gong & Paul X. McCarthy & Colin Griffith & Claire McFarland & Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, 2025. "Cosmos 1.0: a multidimensional map of the emerging technology frontier," Papers 2505.10591, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2025.
    9. Yating Zhao & Yongquan Liang & Yang Zhang & Yanping Zhou, 2025. "How Does Knowledge Coupling Affect Innovation Performance? The Mediation Role of Exploratory and Exploitative Innovation," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 16(3), pages 12786-12808, September.
    10. Leogrande, Angelo & Costantiello, Alberto & Laureti, Lucio & Matarrese, Marco Maria, 2022. "Innovative SMEs Collaborating with Others in Europe," MPRA Paper 113008, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Lingyan Meng & Md Qamruzzaman & Anass Hamad Elneel Adow, 2021. "Technological Adaption and Open Innovation in SMEs: An Strategic Assessment for Women-Owned SMEs Sustainability in Bangladesh," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, March.
    12. Chaudhary, Sanjay & Kaur, Puneet & Ferraris, Alberto & Bresciani, Stefano & Dhir, Amandeep, 2024. "Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    13. Duc Anh Nguyen & Liliana Mitkova, 2024. "Recent research trends in open innovation in SMEs: a bibliometric literature review," Post-Print hal-04712830, HAL.
    14. Julian Alexandrakis & Julia Hein & Jan Kratzer, 2022. "Living Labs and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises: A Symbioses Propelling Sustainable Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Silviya Georgieva & Maria Vasilska & Kostadin Kolarov, 2023. "The Use of University Research Products in Entrepreneurial Practice: Specifics According To Size Class of Enterprises and Sectors of Economic Activities," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 8, pages 142-163.
    16. Chang Lu & Yong Qi & Bo Yu, 2024. "Effects of Domestic and International External Collaboration on New Product Development Performance in SMEs: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Antonia Madrid-Guijarro & Dominique Philippe Martin & Domingo García-Pérez-de-Lema, 2021. "Capacity of open innovation activities in fostering product and process innovation in manufacturing SMEs," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 15(7), pages 2137-2164, October.
    18. Yanling Yang & Yanling Zheng & Guojie Xie & Yu Tian, 2022. "The Influence Mechanism of Strategic Partnership on Enterprise Performance: Exploring the Chain Mediating Role of Information Sharing and Supply Chain Flexibility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    19. Wang, Nan & Wan, Jiahao & Ma, Zhenzhong & Zhou, Yan & Chen, Jin, 2023. "How digital platform capabilities improve sustainable innovation performance of firms: The mediating role of open innovation," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    20. Marzi, Giacomo & Fakhar Manesh, Mohammad & Caputo, Andrea & Pellegrini, Massimiliano Matteo & Vlačić, Božidar, 2023. "Do or do not. Cognitive configurations affecting open innovation adoption in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:82:y:2025:i:c:s0160791x25000910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.