IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v67y2021ics0160791x2100186x.html

Vulnerable groups, virtual cities, and social isolation

Author

Listed:
  • Epting, Shane

Abstract

The number of people suffering from perpetual loneliness continues to increase, diminishing their wellbeing. While this condition affects people's mental life, research shows that it also significantly impacts physical health. Those enduring such hardships often have superficial encounters, but they lack meaningful social engagement with others. Addressing this problem requires highly specialized and interdisciplinary mitigatory efforts. The increasing economic feasibility of virtual reality equipment can help remedy some of these situations, especially when users can connect in supportive digital environs, “virtual cities.” In turn, this exploratory paper examines how creating specific kinds of virtual cities could facilitate meaningful social engagements, which can improve numerous people's living conditions. The author fleshes out this view, showing that these technologies' progressive nature can be shaped to secure the needed measures to improve the quality of some people's lives..

Suggested Citation

  • Epting, Shane, 2021. "Vulnerable groups, virtual cities, and social isolation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:67:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x2100186x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X2100186X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:abf:journl:v:31:y:2020:i:3:p:24255-24260 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Misra, Shalini & Stokols, Daniel, 2012. "A typology of people–environment relationships in the Digital Age," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 311-325.
    3. Brey, Philip, 2018. "The strategic role of technology in a good society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-45.
    4. (Boni) Li, Yushi & Perkins, Amanda, 2007. "The impact of technological developments on the daily life of the elderly," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 361-368.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arpaci, Ibrahim & Karatas, Kasim & Kusci, Ismail & Al-Emran, Mostafa, 2022. "Understanding the social sustainability of the Metaverse by integrating UTAUT2 and big five personality traits: A hybrid SEM-ANN approach," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    2. Perperidis, Giannis, 2023. "The politics of the city: Critical theory of technology and urban design(s)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. von Meduna, Marc & Steinmetz, Fred & Ante, Lennart & Reynolds, Jennifer & Fiedler, Ingo, 2020. "Loot boxes are gambling-like elements in video games with harmful potential: Results from a large-scale population survey," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Irwansyah,, 2020. "The social contractual utilitarianism of a digital village in rural Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    4. Heister, Stanton & Yuthas, Kristi, 2020. "The blockchain and how it can influence conceptions of the self," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    5. Nikolaos Karanasios & Antje Tandetzky & Antonella Reitano & Marco Fazio & Elena Stavrova, 2019. "Development: Crossing the Bridge Pondering Socio-Economic and Techno-Science," Economic Alternatives, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria, issue 4, pages 537-548, December.
    6. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    7. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "Privacy as an aggregate public good," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    8. Dong, Jinjin & Shao, Meirong, 2025. "The impact of technology for social good (TSG) on the effectiveness of corporate ESG self-regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    9. Jeroen K.G. Hopster & Alessio Gerola & Ben Hofbauer & Guido Löhr & Julia Rijssenbeek & Paulan Korenhof, 2024. "Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 414-433, August.
    10. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    11. Hyunjae Daniel Shin & Richard Bull, 2019. "Three Dimensions of Design for Sustainable Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    12. Joao J. M. Ferreira & Cristina Fernandes & Vanessa Ratten, 2019. "The effects of technology transfers and institutional factors on economic growth: evidence from Europe and Oceania," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 44(5), pages 1505-1528, October.
    13. Perdana, Arif & Mokhtar, Intan Azura, 2022. "Seniors’ adoption of digital devices and virtual event platforms in Singapore during Covid-19," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Sukkird, Vatcharapong & Shirahada, Kunio, 2015. "Technology challenges to healthcare service innovation in aging Asia: Case of value co-creation in emergency medical support system," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 122-128.
    15. Ana Suárez-Álvarez & María Rosalía Vicente, 2025. "Internet use and the Well-Being of the Elders. A Quantitative Study in an Aged Country," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 1121-1135, February.
    16. Toms, G. & Verity, F. & Orrell, A., 2019. "Social care technologies for older people: Evidence for instigating a broader and more inclusive dialogue," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    17. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2023. "Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    18. Merodio Gómez, Paloma & Ramírez Santiago, Andrea & García Seco, Gabriela & Casanova, Rosario & MacKenzie, Denise & Tucker, Christopher, 2022. "Ethics in the use of geospatial information in the Americas," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Melović, Boban & Jocović, Mijat & Dabić, Marina & Vulić, Tamara Backović & Dudic, Branislav, 2020. "The impact of digital transformation and digital marketing on the brand promotion, positioning and electronic business in Montenegro," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping & Suntu, Shaldon Leparan & Bishoge, Obadia Kyetuza, 2019. "Influence of technology transfer on performance and sustainability of standard gauge railway in developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 79-92.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:67:y:2021:i:c:s0160791x2100186x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.