IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/techno/v140y2025ics0166497224001962.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does idea rejection translate into employee creativity: A perspective from incubation theory

Author

Listed:
  • Hu, Weimin
  • He, Bin
  • Sun, Xu
  • Jian, Hao

Abstract

Previous studies have generally posited that idea rejection negatively impacts innovation performance, however, few have explored the potential positive effects. From a novel perspective grounded in incubation theory, this research investigated whether, how, and when idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. Six studies were conducted: a questionnaire survey (Study 1a) and five simulated situational experiments (Studies 1b, 1c, 1d, 2, and 3). In Study 1a, we collected samples from various industry backgrounds, including manufacturing, high-tech companies, internet-related companies, and modern service industries, to verify whether idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. Studies 1b, 1c, and 1d further validated the findings of Study 1a in distinct fields—new home and kitchen products, technology, and scientific research—through simulated situational experiments. Studies 2 and 3 selected new home and kitchen products as representative experimental situations and used simulated situational experiments to explore the mechanisms and boundary conditions through which idea rejection translates into employee creativity. The results revealed that idea rejection could be translated into employee creativity. This translation was mediated by both problem restructuring and the activation of new knowledge. Furthermore, servant leadership positively moderated the relationship between idea rejection and the activation of new knowledge, thereby strengthening the mediating role of the latter. However, servant leadership did not moderate the relationship between idea rejection and problem restructuring, nor did it enhance the mediating role of problem restructuring. These findings opened the “black box” of how idea rejection is translated into employee creativity, expanded the research on the effects of idea rejection, and provided a reference for organizational innovation management practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Hu, Weimin & He, Bin & Sun, Xu & Jian, Hao, 2025. "How does idea rejection translate into employee creativity: A perspective from incubation theory," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 140(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:140:y:2025:i:c:s0166497224001962
    DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103146
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166497224001962
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103146?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco, 2023. "Innovation labs as organisational catalysts for innovation capacity development: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    2. Lindelöf, Peter & Hellberg, Roland, 2023. "Incubation - An evolutionary process," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    3. Del Sarto, Nicola & Cruz Cazares, Claudio & Di Minin, Alberto, 2022. "Startup accelerators as an open environment: The impact on startups’ innovative performance," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    4. Paola Criscuolo & Ammon Salter & Anne L. J. Ter Wal, 2014. "Going Underground: Bootlegging and Individual Innovative Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 1287-1305, October.
    5. Tim G. Schweisfurth & Anne Greul, 2024. "Unexpected Interruptions, Idle Time, and Creativity: Evidence from a Natural Experiment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(1), pages 116-137, January.
    6. Fetrati, Mahdieh A. & Hansen, David & Akhavan, Payman, 2022. "How to manage creativity in organizations: Connecting the literature on organizational creativity through bibliometric research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    7. Amba Maria Erkelens & Neil Aaron Thompson & Dominic Chalmers, 2024. "The dynamic construction of an incubation context: a practice theory perspective," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 62(2), pages 583-605, February.
    8. Jiménez-Estévez, Pedro & Yáñez-Araque, Benito & Ruiz-Palomino, Pablo & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Personal growth or servant leader: What do hotel employees need most to be affectively well amidst the turbulent COVID-19 times?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    9. Codini, Anna Paola & Abbate, Tindara & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2023. "Business Model Innovation and exaptation: A new way of innovating in SMEs," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    10. Hao Kong & Warren CK Chiu & Humphrey KW Leung, 2019. "Building creative self-efficacy via learning goal orientation, creativity job requirement, and team learning behavior: The key to employee creativity," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 44(3), pages 443-461, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Blomkvist, Katarina & Engzell, Jeanette & Kappen, Philip & Zander, Ivo, 2024. "How organizational conditions affect employees’ intentions to engage in intrapreneurial new venturing," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    2. Becker, Kai & Ebbers, Joris J. & Engel, Yuval, 2024. "Going online: Peer entrepreneur networks in a startup accelerator before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Xiaoxiao Gao & Longmei Wang & Lei Lu & Weilin Wu, 2024. "The influence of bootleg innovation on individual innovation performance: The mediating effect of cognitive flexibility and the moderating effect of leadership’s emotional intelligence," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(2), pages 1-22, February.
    4. Md. Abu Issa Gazi & Md. Kazi Hafizur Rahman & Abdullah Al Masud & Mohammad Bin Amin & Naznin Sultana Chaity & Abdul Rahman bin S. Senathirajah & Masuk Abdullah, 2024. "AI Capability and Sustainable Performance: Unveiling the Mediating Effects of Organizational Creativity and Green Innovation with Knowledge Sharing Culture as a Moderator," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Tanweer, Syeda Zainab & Shah, Muhammad Saud & Nabi, Agha Ammad & Mukhi, Aftab Ali & Ahad, Muhammad, 2023. "Accelerating Growth: Unleashing the Power of Accelerator Programs as Strategic Investments for Startups in Pakistan," MPRA Paper 117474, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 28 May 2023.
    6. Jie Shang & Tao Guo & Xiaozhou Ding, 2025. "Pinpoint the Golden Point: A Moderated Inverted‐U Relationship Between Digital Transformation and Business Model Innovation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(5), pages 3250-3265, July.
    7. Reem Al Sharif & Shaligram Pokharel & Mohamed Arselene Ayari & Marwa Essam & Salwa Aqeel, 2022. "Enabling Open Innovation in Digital Startups through the Incubation Program—A Case of Qatar," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-17, May.
    8. Jane Wamaitha Mwangi-Thungu & Patrick Ngugi & Allan Mugambi, 2024. "A Structured Approach to Mentoring Tertiary Level Entrepreneurship Students: A Literature Review," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(4), pages 2842-2857, April.
    9. Ana Rosado-Cubero & Adolfo Hernández & Francisco José Blanco-Jiménez & Teresa Freire-Rubio, 2024. "Keys of accelerators success: evidence from Spain," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 2423-2446, September.
    10. Schnell, Lukas & Berger, Elisabeth S.C., 2025. "Sharing and exchange dynamics in entrepreneurial spaces: a systematic literature review and conceptualization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    11. Jose Montes & Aglaya Batz & Lizeth Fernanda Serrano Cárdenas, 2024. "A taxonomy of innovation spaces from the innovation networks lens," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-25, December.
    12. Etienne Capron & Raphaël Suire, 2024. "Revealing preferential circulation—how the use of places serves localized entrepreneurs’ capabilities," Post-Print hal-04849572, HAL.
    13. Hartmann, Mia Rosa & Hartmann, Rasmus Koss, 2023. "Hiding practices in employee-user innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(4).
    14. Ter Wal, Anne L.J. & Criscuolo, Paola & Salter, Ammon, 2017. "Making a marriage of materials: The role of gatekeepers and shepherds in the absorption of external knowledge and innovation performance," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 1039-1054.
    15. Stroh, Tim & Mention, Anne-Laure & Duff, Cameron, 2023. "The impact of evolved psychological mechanisms on innovation and adoption: A systematic literature review," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    16. Schiuma, Giovanni & Santarsiero, Francesco & Carlucci, Daniela & Jarrar, Yasar, 2024. "Transformative leadership competencies for organizational digital transformation," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(4), pages 425-437.
    17. Slobodan Acimovic & Nenad Stajic, 2022. "Startups – Business Models For Enhancing Supply Chain 4.0," Business Logistics in Modern Management, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, Faculty of Economics, Croatia, vol. 22, pages 171-190.
    18. Osorio, Ferney & Giones, Ferran & Dupont, Laurent & Camargo, Mauricio, 2025. "Innovation labs strategy: unfolding the multifaceted role of strategic intent," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    19. Pedersen, Carsten Lund, 2021. "Taking matters into one’s own hands? Addressing the relational nature of FLE autonomy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 366-376.
    20. Sameti, Ardalan & Mashhady, Arash & Khalili, Hamidreza & Kim, Namwoon, 2025. "How is a product manager-designer relationship in a professional setting stimulated to generate a creative outcome?," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:techno:v:140:y:2025:i:c:s0166497224001962. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/01664972 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.