IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v78y2008i15p2522-2527.html

Consistent estimation of the accuracy of importance sampling using regenerative simulation

Author

Listed:
  • Bhattacharya, Sourabh

Abstract

Importance sampling is a common technique traditionally used in cases where interest lies in estimation of characteristics of a density [pi](1), but samples are available from a different distribution [pi](0). It is important, however, to evaluate the accuracy of the estimate obtained using importance sampling. In cases where samples are obtained using Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, there does not seem to exist in the literature any consistent or easily computable estimate of the variance of the importance sampling estimator. In this paper we propose an estimator based on regenerative simulation that is consistent as well as easily computable.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhattacharya, Sourabh, 2008. "Consistent estimation of the accuracy of importance sampling using regenerative simulation," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(15), pages 2522-2527, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:78:y:2008:i:15:p:2522-2527
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(08)00159-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geweke, John, 1989. "Bayesian Inference in Econometric Models Using Monte Carlo Integration," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 57(6), pages 1317-1339, November.
    2. Jones, Galin L. & Haran, Murali & Caffo, Brian S. & Neath, Ronald, 2006. "Fixed-Width Output Analysis for Markov Chain Monte Carlo," Journal of the American Statistical Association, American Statistical Association, vol. 101, pages 1537-1547, December.
    3. James P. Hobert, 2002. "On the applicability of regenerative simulation in Markov chain Monte Carlo," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 89(4), pages 731-743, December.
    4. Peter W. Glynn & Donald L. Iglehart, 1990. "Simulation Output Analysis Using Standardized Time Series," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Raices Cruz, Ivette & Lindström, Johan & Troffaes, Matthias C.M. & Sahlin, Ullrika, 2022. "Iterative importance sampling with Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling in robust Bayesian analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Matti Vihola & Jouni Helske & Jordan Franks, 2020. "Importance sampling type estimators based on approximate marginal Markov chain Monte Carlo," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 47(4), pages 1339-1376, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Johnson, Alicia A. & Jones, Galin L., 2015. "Geometric ergodicity of random scan Gibbs samplers for hierarchical one-way random effects models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 325-342.
    2. Kin Wai Chan & Chun Yip Yau, 2017. "High-order Corrected Estimator of Asymptotic Variance with Optimal Bandwidth," Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, Danish Society for Theoretical Statistics;Finnish Statistical Society;Norwegian Statistical Association;Swedish Statistical Association, vol. 44(4), pages 866-898, December.
    3. Yu Hang Jiang & Tong Liu & Zhiya Lou & Jeffrey S. Rosenthal & Shanshan Shangguan & Fei Wang & Zixuan Wu, 2022. "Markov Chain Confidence Intervals and Biases," International Journal of Statistics and Probability, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(1), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Fernandez-Cornejo, Jorge & Wechsler, Seth James, 2012. "Fifteen Years Later: Examining the Adoption of Bt Corn Varieties by U.S. Farmers," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124257, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    5. Alex Stivala & Peng Wang & Alessandro Lomi, 2024. "ALAAMEE: Open-source software for fitting autologistic actor attribute models," PLOS Complex Systems, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(4), pages 1-32, December.
    6. Cranfield, John A.L. & Preckel, Paul V. & Liu, Songquan, 1997. "Approximating Bayesian Posteriors using Multivariate Gaussian Quadrature," 1997 Annual Meeting, July 13-16, 1997, Reno\ Sparks, Nevada 35791, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    7. Chu, Chi-Hsiang & Lee, Kuo-Jung & Hsu, Chien-Chin & Chen, Ray-Bing, 2025. "Bayesian selection approach for categorical responses via multinomial probit models," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    8. Ardia, David & Hoogerheide, Lennart F., 2010. "Efficient Bayesian estimation and combination of GARCH-type models," MPRA Paper 22919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    9. Koopman, Siem Jan & Lucas, André, 2008. "A Non-Gaussian Panel Time Series Model for Estimating and Decomposing Default Risk," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, American Statistical Association, vol. 26, pages 510-525.
    10. Bauwens, Luc & Bos, Charles S. & van Dijk, Herman K. & van Oest, Rutger D., 2004. "Adaptive radial-based direction sampling: some flexible and robust Monte Carlo integration methods," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 123(2), pages 201-225, December.
    11. Goldman Elena & Tsurumi Hiroki, 2005. "Bayesian Analysis of a Doubly Truncated ARMA-GARCH Model," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 9(2), pages 1-38, June.
    12. Chan Joshua & Doucet Arnaud & León-González Roberto & Strachan Rodney W., 2025. "Multivariate Stochastic Volatility with Co-Heteroscedasticity," Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 29(3), pages 265-300.
    13. Arnaud Dufays, 2016. "Evolutionary Sequential Monte Carlo Samplers for Change-Point Models," Econometrics, MDPI, vol. 4(1), pages 1-33, March.
    14. İsmail Başoğlu & Wolfgang Hörmann & Halis Sak, 2018. "Efficient simulations for a Bernoulli mixture model of portfolio credit risk," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 260(1), pages 113-128, January.
    15. Borowska, Agnieszka & Hoogerheide, Lennart & Koopman, Siem Jan & van Dijk, Herman K., 2020. "Partially censored posterior for robust and efficient risk evaluation," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 217(2), pages 335-355.
    16. Mengheng Li & Siem Jan (S.J.) Koopman, 2018. "Unobserved Components with Stochastic Volatility in U.S. Inflation: Estimation and Signal Extraction," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 18-027/III, Tinbergen Institute.
    17. Ricardo Reis & Vasco Curdia, 2009. "Correlated Disturbances and U.S. Business Cycles," 2009 Meeting Papers 129, Society for Economic Dynamics.
    18. Fernández, C. & Steel, M.F.J., 1996. "On Bayesian Inference under Sampling from Scale Mixtures of Normals," Discussion Paper 1996-02, Tilburg University, Center for Economic Research.
    19. Jenkins, Amanda & Velandia, Margarita & Lambert, Dayton M. & Roberts, Roland K. & Larson, James A. & English, Burton C. & Martin, Steven W., 2011. "Factors Influencing the Selection of Precision Farming Information Sources by Cotton Producers," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 40(2), pages 307-320, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:78:y:2008:i:15:p:2522-2527. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.