IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

The model selection criterion AICu

Listed author(s):
  • McQuarrie, Allan
  • Shumway, Robert
  • Tsai, Chih-Ling
Registered author(s):

    For regression and time series model selection, Hurvich and Tsai (1989) obtained a bias correction Akaike information criterion, AICc, which provides better model order choices than the Akaike information criterion, AIC (Akaike, 1973). In this paper, we propose an alternative improved regression model selection criterion, AICu, which is an approximate unbiased estimator of Kullback-Leibler information. We show that AICu is neither a consistent (Shibata, 1986) nor an efficient (Shibata, 1980, 1981) criterion. Our simulation studies indicate that the behavior of AICu is a compromise between that of efficient (AICc) and consistent (BIC, Akaike, 1978) criteria. Specifically, AICu performs better than AICc for moderate to large sample sizes except when the true model is of infinite order. In addition, it outperforms BIC except when a true model exists and the sample size is large.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Statistics & Probability Letters.

    Volume (Year): 34 (1997)
    Issue (Month): 3 (June)
    Pages: 285-292

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:285-292
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:34:y:1997:i:3:p:285-292. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.