Changing the nature of physician referral relationships in the US: the impact of managed care
Prior to the era of managed care in the US, health care delivery was managed by the professional activities of physicians. Managed care replaces management by profession with bureaucratic management structures and oversight, such as utilization review and gatekeeping (required referrals to specialty care). Practically, this means that physicians cannot use the professional relationships that typified practice under fee-for-service medicine, potentially changing not only what physicians do (e.g., order test or not, refer or not), but also how they do what they do. In this paper I look at just one of the changes brought about by managed care: contractual arrangements that require primary care providers to refer patients to a closed panel of specialist physicians. Through an in-depth case study of 45 primary care providers' in the USA who face restricted specialist panels for their managed care patients, but not for their fee-for-service patients, I investigate how the practice of referring is changed by this requirement. First, I use interview data to describe primary care providers general preferences for referral consultants, as well as their views of the referral process and potential barriers in it. Next I present data from all referrals over a four-week period to analyze the extent of referral relationships in actual referrals. Finally, I conclude by discussing some ways that managed care entities can facilitate rather than diminish referral relationships among physicians.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 56 (2003)
Issue (Month): 10 (May)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description|
|Order Information:|| Postal: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/supportfaq.cws_home/regional|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:56:y:2003:i:10:p:2033-2044. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.