IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v378y2025ics0277953625004836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Silence as a manner within the doctor's epistemic posture during the diagnostic process: A case study in a French hospital

Author

Listed:
  • Glauzy, Antoine

Abstract

The notion of silence often emerges between the lines in studies on diagnosis and the disclosure of bad news to patients. However, silence rarely takes center stage in such studies, risking an underestimation of its significance. This study, conducted through observations and semi-structured interviews in a hospital specializing in liver and pancreatic diseases, centers its analysis on the role of silence. It explores how institutional norms and constraints shape doctors' use of silence during consultations and diagnostic processes. The findings reveal that silence, understood as withholding information or concealing the name of a disease, serves distinct functions: in the pre-diagnostic phase, it helps prepare patients for the possibility of illness while respecting institutional expectations; at the moment of diagnosis, it reinforces doctors' adherence to a scientific framework. This research argues that silence is a central attitude of the doctor's epistemic posture, mediating the complex interplay between institutional demands and patient care.

Suggested Citation

  • Glauzy, Antoine, 2025. "Silence as a manner within the doctor's epistemic posture during the diagnostic process: A case study in a French hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 378(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:378:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004836
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004836
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118153?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:378:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.