IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v376y2025ics0277953625004381.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost of being a legal patient: Judicial use of rape defendants' and victims’ psychiatric records in South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Park, Joohyun

Abstract

Mental health evidence in courts can either support or undermine the trustworthiness and accuracy of each party's claims. When defendants and victims of sex crimes against women present their medical evidence, how are their claims impacted differently? This paper examines the court's interpretation of defendants' and victims' psychiatric records in 821 South Korean court cases involving rape (2013–2023). The findings show that a defendant's credibility is discussed as a potential mitigating factor in determining their responsibility and treatability. In contrast, a victim's credibility is debated at the risk of dismissing the entire case, determining the occurrence of the crime and new harm. This structural imbalance is exacerbated when rape trials turn into false accusation trials, in which rape victims must use their psychiatric evidence to invalidate their own rape allegations. The paper highlights the asymmetrical cost of being a patient to speak up in court and discusses the consequences of diagnosis with the term legal patient.

Suggested Citation

  • Park, Joohyun, 2025. "The cost of being a legal patient: Judicial use of rape defendants' and victims’ psychiatric records in South Korea," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 376(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:376:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004381
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625004381
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:376:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625004381. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.