IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v373y2025ics0277953625003429.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deteriorating care home residents as ‘matter out of place’ in both care homes and hospitals: An ethnographic study

Author

Listed:
  • Harrad-Hyde, Fawn
  • Williams, Chris
  • Armstrong, Natalie

Abstract

Older people living in care homes are susceptible to deteriorations in their health. At times of deterioration, care home staff play a crucial role in considering the potential benefits and burdens associated with either caring for the resident in the home or transferring them to hospital. Using data collected through interviews with 30 care home staff and 113 h of ethnographic fieldwork in care homes in England, we consider the ways that care home staff can perceive deteriorating care home residents to be, often simultaneously, vulnerable (or ‘at risk’) and dangerous (or ‘a risk’) in both the hospital and the care home. Drawing on the work of Mary Douglas, we suggest deteriorating care home residents can be considered to be ‘matter out of place’ and can therefore be considered as ‘placeless’ in whichever setting they receive care. Instead of asking whether deteriorating residents are in the ‘right place’ to receive care, we might instead ask whether healthcare services are the ‘right shape’ to support to deteriorating care home residents and their complex needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Harrad-Hyde, Fawn & Williams, Chris & Armstrong, Natalie, 2025. "Deteriorating care home residents as ‘matter out of place’ in both care homes and hospitals: An ethnographic study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 373(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:373:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625003429
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625003429
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.118012?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:373:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625003429. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.