IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v366y2025ics0277953625000401.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Grandparental childcare and subjective well-being: The role of activities and reasons for care

Author

Listed:
  • Glaser, Karen
  • Di Gessa, Giorgio

Abstract

Despite extensive research on the impact of grandchild care on grandparents' well-being, no studies have examined the frequency of activities that grandparents engage in with their grandchildren or the reasons for care using nationally representative data. We address this gap using waves 8 (2016/2017) and 9 (2018/19) of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing, a nationally representative study of English older adults. We employ hybrid regression models to distinguish between within- and between-individual effects on grandparents’ subjective wellbeing, as captured by quality of life and depressive symptoms. Our findings show that the mostly positive relationships between frequency of grandparental activities and reasons for care and well-being are largely due to between-grandparent differences rather than within-grandparent changes over time. Within-grandparent analyses show a mostly non-significant impact of increased grandparental activities on well-being, except for a detrimental effect when grandchildren stay overnight or are cared for when sick. The influence of reasons for care are more nuanced. Changes in reasons, such as giving parents a break or allowing them to go out in the evening, are significantly associated with a worsening of elevated depressive symptoms. Conversely, changes such as helping grandchildren develop as people or feeling engaged with young people improve the quality of life for the same grandparents over time. When grandparental care is provided because it is difficult to refuse we find a negative association with well-being between grandparents. Overall, our findings highlight the importance of more detailed information on grandparent-grandchild interactions and reasons for care to better understand well-being outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Glaser, Karen & Di Gessa, Giorgio, 2025. "Grandparental childcare and subjective well-being: The role of activities and reasons for care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 366(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000401
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117711
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953625000401
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2025.117711?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:366:y:2025:i:c:s0277953625000401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.