IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Regional dispersion of independent professionals in primary health care in the Netherlands

Listed author(s):
  • Hingstman, L.
  • Boon, H.
Registered author(s):

    One of the main objectives of Dutch Government policy on primary health care concerns equal regional dispersion of health care provisions. At this moment these provisions are geographically not equally distributed when measured in terms of the number of inhabitants per practising professional in primary health care. In this paper the current patterns of dispersion of five professional groups are described. The groups concerned are the general practitioners, dentists, physiotherapists, pharmacists and midwives. These patterns are mainly a consequence of market forces because the professionals have had the freedom to choose where to practise their profession until recently. These decisions are affected by the "place utility" of an area. In this paper place utility is conceived as being determinated by the opportunities of an area to earn a living and the amenities of an area as residential and living-environment. These concepts are operationalized by a set of independent variables. In order to understand the (differences between the) patterns of dispersion of the professional groups concerned multiple regression-analysis has been used, of which the results are compared to the hypotheses formulated.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Elsevier in its journal Social Science & Medicine.

    Volume (Year): 28 (1989)
    Issue (Month): 2 (January)
    Pages: 121-129

    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:2:p:121-129
    Contact details of provider: Web page:

    Order Information: Postal:

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:28:y:1989:i:2:p:121-129. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dana Niculescu)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.