IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v228y2019icp202-210.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The politics of institutionalizing preventive health

Author

Listed:
  • Boswell, John
  • Cairney, Paul
  • St Denny, Emily

Abstract

Prevention is an attractive idea to policymakers in theory, particularly in health where the burden of spending and care is increasingly taken up by complex and chronic conditions associated with lifestyle choices. However, prevention in general, and preventive health in particular, has proven hard to implement in practice. In this paper, we look to one tangible legacy of the recent rise of the prevention agenda: agencies with responsibility for preventive health policy. We ask how this form of institutionalizing preventive health happens in practice, and what consequences it has for the advancement of the prevention agenda. We draw on qualitative data to compare the trajectories of newly formed agencies in Australia, New Zealand and England. We find that building and maintaining legitimacy for such agencies may come at the expense of quick progress or radical action in service of the prevention agenda.

Suggested Citation

  • Boswell, John & Cairney, Paul & St Denny, Emily, 2019. "The politics of institutionalizing preventive health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 202-210.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:228:y:2019:i:c:p:202-210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619301248
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.02.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baker, Phillip & Gill, Timothy & Friel, Sharon & Carey, Gemma & Kay, Adrian, 2017. "Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 141-149.
    2. Guglielmin, Maria & Muntaner, Carles & O’Campo, Patricia & Shankardass, Ketan, 2018. "A scoping review of the implementation of health in all policies at the local level," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(3), pages 284-292.
    3. Koop, Christel, 2011. "Explaining the Accountability of Independent Agencies: The Importance of Political Salience," Journal of Public Policy, Cambridge University Press, vol. 31(2), pages 209-234, August.
    4. Christopher R. Berry & Barry C. Burden & William G. Howell, 2010. "After Enactment: The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 1-17, January.
    5. Matthew Flinders & Chris Skelcher, 2012. "Shrinking the quango state: five challenges in reforming quangos," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 327-334, September.
    6. James, Oliver & Petrovsky, Nicolai & Moseley, Alice & Boyne, George A., 2016. "The Politics of Agency Death: Ministers and the Survival of Government Agencies in a Parliamentary System," British Journal of Political Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 46(4), pages 763-784, October.
    7. Carpenter, Daniel P. & Lewis, David E., 2004. "Political Learning from Rare Events: Poisson Inference, Fiscal Constraints, and the Lifetime of Bureaus," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(3), pages 201-232, July.
    8. Sandra Meister, 2012. "Introduction," Springer Books, in: Brand Communities for Fast Moving Consumer Goods, chapter 1, pages 1-7, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacques, Olivier & Noël, Alain, 2022. "The politics of public health investments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    2. Maria Denisa Vasilescu & Simona Andreea Apostu & Eva Militaru & Eglantina Hysa, 2022. "Public Opinion on European Health Policy, Lessons from the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Olivier Jacques & Alain Noel, 2022. "Austerity Reduces Public Health Investment," CIRANO Working Papers 2022s-02, CIRANO.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia Fresneda & Nuria Reguera & Fernando Casas, 2021. "De-agentification Process in Spanish Regional Governments," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 236(1), pages 39-64, March.
    2. Roy Gava, 2022. "Challenging the regulators: Enforcement and appeals in financial regulation," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(4), pages 1265-1282, October.
    3. Maite Morteruel & Amaia Bacigalupe & Elena Aldasoro & Isabel Larrañaga & Elena Serrano, 2020. "Health Impact Assessments in Spain: Have They Been Effective?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Cyril Benoît, 2021. "Politicians, regulators, and regulatory governance: The neglected sides of the story," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(S1), pages 8-22, November.
    5. Heald, David & Steel, David, 2018. "The governance of public bodies in times of austerity," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 149-160.
    6. Stuart Kasdin & Anthony McCann, 2022. "What drives program terminations for the federal government?," Public Budgeting & Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 28-44, March.
    7. Nishita Dsouza & Anitha Devadason & Araliya M. Senerat & Patrin Watanatada & David Rojas-Rueda & Giselle Sebag, 2023. "Sustainability and Equity in Urban Development (S&EUD): A Content Analysis of “Bright Spots” from the Accelerating City Equity (ACE) Project," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-16, April.
    8. Djoeke van Dale & Lidwien Lemmens & Marieke Hendriksen & Nella Savolainen & Péter Nagy & Edit Marosi & Michela Eigenmann & Ingrid Stegemann & Heather L. Rogers, 2020. "Recommendations for Effective Intersectoral Collaboration in Health Promotion Interventions: Results from Joint Action CHRODIS-PLUS Work Package 5 Activities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Amri, Michelle & Chatur, Ali & O'Campo, Patricia, 2022. "An umbrella review of intersectoral and multisectoral approaches to health policy," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    10. Stéphane Lavertu, 2015. "For fear of popular politics? Public attention and the delegation of authority to the United States executive branch," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 9(2), pages 160-177, June.
    11. Dana Foarta, 2021. "How Organizational Capacity Can Improve Electoral Accountability," BAFFI CAREFIN Working Papers 21156, BAFFI CAREFIN, Centre for Applied Research on International Markets Banking Finance and Regulation, Universita' Bocconi, Milano, Italy.
    12. Matthew C. Stephenson, 2013. "Does Separation of Powers Promote Stability and Moderation?," The Journal of Legal Studies, University of Chicago Press, vol. 42(2), pages 331-368.
    13. Sharon Ron & Noelle Dimitri & Shir Lerman Ginzburg & Ellin Reisner & Pilar Botana Martinez & Wig Zamore & Ben Echevarria & Doug Brugge & Linda S. Sprague Martinez, 2021. "Health Lens Analysis: A Strategy to Engage Community in Environmental Health Research in Action," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-13, February.
    14. Leixnering, Stephan & Bramböck, Stefanie, 2013. "Public-Corporate-Governance-Kodizes: Die Köpenickiade der Beteiligungsverwaltung," ZögU - Zeitschrift für öffentliche und gemeinwirtschaftliche Unternehmen, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 36(2-3), pages 170-190.
    15. Mark Bovens & Anchrit Wille, 2021. "Indexing watchdog accountability powers a framework for assessing the accountability capacity of independent oversight institutions," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(3), pages 856-876, July.
    16. Brydie Clarke & Janelle Kwon & Boyd Swinburn & Gary Sacks, 2021. "Understanding the dynamics of obesity prevention policy decision-making using a systems perspective: A case study of Healthy Together Victoria," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Christopher R. Berry & Barry C. Burden & William G. Howell, 2010. "After Enactment: The Lives and Deaths of Federal Programs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 1-17, January.
    18. Manuel Becker & Thomas Dörfler & Thomas Gehring, 2018. "Credible commitment without independent regulatory agent: Evidence from the Security Council's United Nations Compensation Commission," Regulation & Governance, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 12(3), pages 395-412, September.
    19. Owusu-Addo, Ebenezer & Renzaho, Andre M.N. & Smith, Ben J., 2020. "Developing a middle-range theory to explain how cash transfers work to tackle the social determinants of health: A realist case study," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    20. Coban, Mehmet Kerem, 2020. "Diffuse interest groups and regulatory policy change: Financial consumer protection in Turkey," OSF Preprints f6t5y, Center for Open Science.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:228:y:2019:i:c:p:202-210. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.