IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v147y2015icp150-157.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Poly Implant Prothèse breast prostheses scandal: Embodied risk and social suffering

Author

Listed:
  • Greco, Cinzia

Abstract

This article examines the 2010 scandal surrounding the use and subsequent recall of adulterated Poly Implant Prothèse (PIP) silicone breast prostheses in France. It uses a mixed method approach that includes 12 interviews with French PIP prosthesis recipients, analyses of medical literature, policy documents of French and EU regulatory agencies, and an online forum for PIP recipients. These data are used to explain how the definition of “acceptable risk” in the silicone implants controversy of the 1990s in the US influenced the PIP scandal later on in France. Additionally, PIP recipients had an embodied experience of risk that clashed with the definition of risk used by authorities and some surgeons. The coverage of re-implantation was also defined at different policy levels, leading to variation in patients' suffering. The combination of fraud and lack of recognition from part of the medical system constitutes an example of social suffering for the patients involved. The PIP scandal is a useful case for analyzing the interconnection of embodied experience and professional and public policy definitions of medical risk through the concepts of moral economy and biological citizenship.

Suggested Citation

  • Greco, Cinzia, 2015. "The Poly Implant Prothèse breast prostheses scandal: Embodied risk and social suffering," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 150-157.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:147:y:2015:i:c:p:150-157
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953615302070
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.10.068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Keshavjee, Salmaan & Weiser, Sheri & Kleinman, Arthur, 2001. "Medicine betrayed: hemophilia patients and HIV in the US," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(8), pages 1081-1094, October.
    2. Robert P. Inman, 1997. "Editor's introduction," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 16(1), pages 1-9.
    3. Kavanagh, Anne M. & Broom, Dorothy H., 1998. "Embodied risk: My body, myself?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(3), pages 437-444, February.
    4. Annandale, Ellen & Hunt, Kate, 1998. "Accounts of disagreements with doctors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 46(1), pages 119-129, January.
    5. Fillion, Emmanuelle, 2008. "Clinical relationships tested by iatrogenicity: The case of haemophiliac patients faced with the epidemic of transfusional AIDS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1400-1409, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Magnus Lindelow, 2003. "Understanding spatial variation in the utilization of health services: does quality matter?," Economics Series Working Papers WPS/2004-12, University of Oxford, Department of Economics.
    2. Trundle, Catherine, 2011. "Biopolitical endpoints: Diagnosing a deserving British nuclear test veteran," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 882-888, September.
    3. Dew, Kevin & Roorda, Mathea, 2001. "Institutional innovation and the handling of health complaints in New Zealand: an assessment," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 57(1), pages 27-44, July.
    4. Zenker, Olaf, 2010. "Between the lines: Republicanism, dissenters and the politics of meta-trauma in the Northern Irish conflict," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(2), pages 236-243, July.
    5. Werner-Lin, Allison & Forbes Shepherd, Rowan & Young, Jennifer L. & Wilsnack, Catherine & Merrill, Shana L. & Greene, Mark H. & Khincha, Payal P., 2022. "Embodied risk for families with Li-Fraumeni syndrome: Like electricity through my body," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    6. Gunson, Jessica Shipman, 2010. ""More natural but less normal": Reconsidering medicalisation and agency through women's accounts of menstrual suppression," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(7), pages 1324-1331, October.
    7. Magnus Lindelow, 2004. "Understanding spatial variation in the utilization of health," Development and Comp Systems 0409058, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    8. Eileen Green & Frances Griffiths & Di Thompson, 2006. "‘Are My Bones Normal Doctor?’ the Role of Technology in Understanding and Communicating Health Risks for Midlife Women," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 11(4), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Erol, Maral, 2011. "Melting bones: The social construction of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Turkey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(10), pages 1490-1497.
    10. Brown, Patrick & Elston, Mary Ann & Gabe, Jonathan, 2015. "From patient deference towards negotiated and precarious informality: An Eliasian analysis of English general practitioners' understandings of changing patient relations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 164-172.
    11. Fillion, Emmanuelle, 2008. "Clinical relationships tested by iatrogenicity: The case of haemophiliac patients faced with the epidemic of transfusional AIDS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1400-1409, November.
    12. Salter, Charlotte Ingrid & Howe, Amanda & McDaid, Lisa & Blacklock, Jeanette & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shepstone, Lee, 2011. "Risk, significance and biomedicalisation of a new population: Older women's experience of osteoporosis screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 808-815, September.
    13. Reventlow, Susanne Dalsgaard & Hvas, Lotte & Malterud, Kirsti, 2006. "Making the invisible body visible. Bone scans, osteoporosis and women's bodily experiences," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(11), pages 2720-2731, June.
    14. Gaspar, Mark & Rosenes, Ron & Burchell, Ann N. & Grennan, Troy & Salit, Irving & Grace, Daniel, 2020. "Diagnosing uncertainty: The challenges of implementing medical screening programs for minority sub-populations in Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 244(C).
    15. Blomberg, Karin & Forss, Anette & Ternestedt, Britt-Marie & Tishelman, Carol, 2009. "From 'silent' to 'heard': Professional mediation, manipulation and women's experiences of their body after an abnormal Pap smear," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(3), pages 479-486, February.
    16. Sheila Twinn, 2006. "Balancing uncertainty and acceptance: understanding Chinese women's responses to an abnormal cervical smear result," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(9), pages 1140-1148, September.
    17. Bertotti, Andrea M. & Mann, Emily S. & Miner, Skye A., 2021. "Efficacy as safety: Dominant cultural assumptions and the assessment of contraceptive risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    18. Ross, Paula Thompson, 2015. "Motivations of women with sickle cell disease for asking their partners to undergo genetic testing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 36-43.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:147:y:2015:i:c:p:150-157. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.