IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v114y2014icp26-37.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Discussing race-related limitations of genomic testing for colon cancer risk: Implications for education and counseling

Author

Listed:
  • Butrick, Morgan N.
  • Vanhusen, Lauren
  • Leventhal, Kara-Grace
  • Hooker, Gillian W.
  • Nusbaum, Rachel
  • Peshkin, Beth N.
  • Salehizadeh, Yasmin
  • Pavlick, Jessica
  • Schwartz, Marc D.
  • Graves, Kristi D.

Abstract

This study examines communication about limitations of genomic results interpretation for colon cancer risk during education and counseling of minority participants. As part of a larger study conducted from 2010 to 2012, participants recruited from a large primary care clinic were offered testing for a research panel of 3 genomic markers (single nucleotide polymorphisms or SNPs) for colorectal cancer risk. Genetic counselors conducted pre- and post-test sessions which included discussion of limitations of result interpretation due to the lack of racial/ethnic diversity in research populations from which risk data are derived. Sessions were audio-recorded, transcribed and thematically analyzed. Many participants did not respond directly to this limitation. Among the participants that responded directly to this race-related limitation, many responses were negative. However, a few participants connected the limited minority information about SNPs with the importance of their current research participation. Genetic counselor discussions of this limitation were biomedically focused with limited explanations for the lacking data. The communication process themes identified included: low immediacy (infrequent use of language directly involving a participant), verbal dominance (greater speaking ratio of the counselor to the patient) and wide variation in the degree of interactivity (or the amount of turn-taking during the discussion). Placed within the larger literature on patient-provider communication, these present results provide insight into the dynamics surrounding race-related educational content for genomic testing and other emerging technologies. Clinicians may be better able to engage patients in the use of new genomic technology by increasing their awareness of specific communication processes and patterns during education or counseling sessions.

Suggested Citation

  • Butrick, Morgan N. & Vanhusen, Lauren & Leventhal, Kara-Grace & Hooker, Gillian W. & Nusbaum, Rachel & Peshkin, Beth N. & Salehizadeh, Yasmin & Pavlick, Jessica & Schwartz, Marc D. & Graves, Kristi D., 2014. "Discussing race-related limitations of genomic testing for colon cancer risk: Implications for education and counseling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 26-37.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:114:y:2014:i:c:p:26-37
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953614003086
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.05.014?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roter, Debra L. & Erby, Lori H. & Larson, Susan & Ellington, Lee, 2007. "Assessing oral literacy demand in genetic counseling dialogue: Preliminary test of a conceptual framework," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(7), pages 1442-1457, October.
    2. Hagiwara, Nao & Penner, Louis A. & Gonzalez, Richard & Eggly, Susan & Dovidio, John F. & Gaertner, Samuel L. & West, Tessa & Albrecht, Terrance L., 2013. "Racial attitudes, physician–patient talk time ratio, and adherence in racially discordant medical interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 123-131.
    3. Ellington, Lee & Maxwel, Amiee & Baty, Bonnie J. & Roter, Debra & Dudley, William N. & Kinney, Anita Y., 2007. "Genetic counseling communication with an African American BRCA1 kindred," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 724-734, February.
    4. Hunt, Linda M. & Megyesi, Mary S., 2008. "The ambiguous meanings of the racial/ethnic categories routinely used in human genetics research," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 349-361, January.
    5. Johnson, R.L. & Roter, D. & Powe, N.R. & Cooper, L.A., 2004. "Patient race/ethnicity and quality of patient-physician communication during medical visits," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 94(12), pages 2084-2090.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fenton, Anny T. & Elliott, Marc N. & Schwebel, David C. & Berkowitz, Zahava & Liddon, Nicole C. & Tortolero, Susan R. & Cuccaro, Paula M. & Davies, Suzy L. & Schuster, Mark A., 2018. "Unequal interactions: Examining the role of patient-centered care in reducing inequitable diffusion of a medical innovation, the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 238-248.
    2. Albada, Akke & Ausems, Margreet G.E.M. & van Dulmen, Sandra, 2014. "Counselee participation in follow-up breast cancer genetic counselling visits and associations with achievement of the preferred role, cognitive outcomes, risk perception alignment and perceived perso," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 178-186.
    3. Schut, Rebecca A., 2021. "Racial disparities in provider-patient communication of incidental medical findings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    4. Louis, Kengthsagn & Crum, Alia J. & Markus, Hazel R., 2023. "Negative consequences of self-presentation on disclosure of health information: A catch-22 for Black patients?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    5. Peek, Monica E. & Odoms-Young, Angela & Quinn, Michael T. & Gorawara-Bhat, Rita & Wilson, Shannon C. & Chin, Marshall H., 2010. "Race and shared decision-making: Perspectives of African-Americans with diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 1-9, July.
    6. de Vries, Jantina & Jallow, Muminatou & Williams, Thomas N. & Kwiatkowski, Dominic & Parker, Michael & Fitzpatrick, Raymond, 2012. "Investigating the potential for ethnic group harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa: Is ethnic stigmatisation likely?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1400-1407.
    7. Dovidio, John F. & Penner, Louis A. & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Norton, Wynne E. & Gaertner, Samuel L. & Shelton, J. Nicole, 2008. "Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 478-486, August.
    8. Kuo, Wen-Hua, 2011. "Techno-politics of genomic nationalism: Tracing genomics and its use in drug regulation in Japan and Taiwan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(8), pages 1200-1207.
    9. Hagiwara, Nao & Penner, Louis A. & Gonzalez, Richard & Eggly, Susan & Dovidio, John F. & Gaertner, Samuel L. & West, Tessa & Albrecht, Terrance L., 2013. "Racial attitudes, physician–patient talk time ratio, and adherence in racially discordant medical interactions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 123-131.
    10. Daniele, Vittorio, 2013. "Does the intelligence of populations determine the wealth of nations?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 27-37.
    11. Charles Crabtree & John B. Holbein & J. Quin Monson, 2022. "Patient traits shape health-care stakeholders’ choices on how to best allocate life-saving care," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 6(2), pages 244-257, February.
    12. Bas Geboers & Sijmen A. Reijneveld & Jaap A. R. Koot & Andrea F. De Winter, 2018. "Moving towards a Comprehensive Approach for Health Literacy Interventions: The Development of a Health Literacy Intervention Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-11, June.
    13. Alyson Ma & Alison Sanchez & Mindy Ma, 2022. "Racial disparities in health care utilization, the affordable care act and racial concordance preference," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 91-110, March.
    14. John Burkhardt & Stephen DesJardins & Larry Gruppen, 2021. "Diversity of the physician workforce: Specialty choice decisions during medical school," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Penner, Louis A. & Harper, Felicity W.K. & Dovidio, John F. & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Hamel, Lauren M. & Senft, Nicole & Eggly, Susan, 2017. "The impact of Black cancer patients' race-related beliefs and attitudes on racially-discordant oncology interactions: A field study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 99-108.
    16. Manning, Mark & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Yilmaz-Saab, Zeynep & Penner, Louis & Norman, Andria & Purrington, Kristen, 2017. "Explaining between-race differences in African-American and European-American women's responses to breast density notification," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 149-158.
    17. Thomas, Elizabeth C. & Bass, Sarah Bauerle & Siminoff, Laura A., 2021. "Beyond rationality: Expanding the practice of shared decision making in modern medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    18. Klaas H J Ultee & Elke K M Tjeertes & Frederico Bastos Gonçalves & Ellen V Rouwet & Anton G M Hoofwijk & Robert Jan Stolker & Hence J M Verhagen & Sanne E Hoeks, 2018. "The relation between household income and surgical outcome in the Dutch setting of equal access to and provision of healthcare," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Smith, Sian K. & Dixon, Ann & Trevena, Lyndal & Nutbeam, Don & McCaffery, Kirsten J., 2009. "Exploring patient involvement in healthcare decision making across different education and functional health literacy groups," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 1805-1812, December.
    20. Chyke A Doubeni & Guruprasad D Jambaulikar & Hassan Fouayzi & Scott B Robinson & Margaret J Gunter & Terry S Field & Douglas W Roblin & Robert H Fletcher, 2012. "Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Use of Colonoscopy in an Insured Population – A Retrospective Cohort Study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(5), pages 1-7, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:114:y:2014:i:c:p:26-37. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.