IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v80y2017icp495-504.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of the EU and national environmental legislation on tapping hydropower resources in Lithuania – A lowland country

Author

Listed:
  • Punys, Petras
  • Kasiulis, Egidijus
  • Kvaraciejus, Algis
  • Dumbrauskas, Antanas
  • Vyčienė, Gitana
  • Šilinis, Linas

Abstract

This paper briefly discusses the assessment of hydropower resources (mainly, Small Hydropower, SHP) in the light of general methodologies of renewable energy potential, highlighting the particularities of hydropower. A short review of the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD) from the hydropower development perspective is provided, especially focusing on the impact of power plant pre-planning mechanisms whereby rivers or their reaches are listed as exempt from damming (so-called ‘no go areas’). The hydropower regulation (for prospective hydropower schemes) in the country is critically reviewed, and the current state of the drafting of river basin management plans is presented. Practically speaking, the national water law does not guarantee a declared statement of sustainable use of water resources because of the introduced list of protected rivers exempt from dam construction. In a number of multipurpose water resource development projects that override public interests, e.g., inland navigation and historic water mills, power generation is a secondary service unable to be implemented, due to on the list of protected rivers. In this paper, based on the geospatial datasets of water streams and their environmental attributes, three pre-planning levels for hydropower development are proposed, and the environmentally compliant potential of the SHP is identified. The remaining SHP potential (117 GWh/year or close to 6% of the gross theoretical potential) is among the lowest ones in the EU. The disproportionate environmental constraints in Lithuania are a key factor preventing the development of hydropower and the multipurpose use of water resources.

Suggested Citation

  • Punys, Petras & Kasiulis, Egidijus & Kvaraciejus, Algis & Dumbrauskas, Antanas & Vyčienė, Gitana & Šilinis, Linas, 2017. "Impacts of the EU and national environmental legislation on tapping hydropower resources in Lithuania – A lowland country," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 495-504.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:495-504
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032117308262
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wagner, Beatrice & Hauer, Christoph & Schoder, Angelika & Habersack, Helmut, 2015. "A review of hydropower in Austria: Past, present and future development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 304-314.
    2. Punys, Petras & Pelikan, Bernhard, 2007. "Review of small hydropower in the new Member States and Candidate Countries in the context of the enlarged European Union," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(7), pages 1321-1360, September.
    3. Hastik, Richard & Basso, Stefano & Geitner, Clemens & Haida, Christin & Poljanec, Aleš & Portaccio, Alessia & Vrščaj, Borut & Walzer, Chris, 2015. "Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 608-623.
    4. Izadyar, Nima & Ong, Hwai Chyuan & Chong, W.T. & Leong, K.Y., 2016. "Resource assessment of the renewable energy potential for a remote area: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 908-923.
    5. Jager, Henriëtte I. & Efroymson, Rebecca A. & Opperman, Jeff J. & Kelly, Michael R., 2015. "Spatial design principles for sustainable hydropower development in river basins," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 808-816.
    6. Tsoutsos, Theocharis & Maria, Efpraxia & Mathioudakis, Vassilis, 2007. "Sustainable siting procedure of small hydroelectric plants: The Greek experience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2946-2959, May.
    7. Petras Punys & Antanas Dumbrauskas & Algis Kvaraciejus & Gitana Vyciene, 2011. "Tools for Small Hydropower Plant Resource Planning and Development: A Review of Technology and Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 4(9), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Punys, P. & Adamonyte, I. & Kvaraciejus, A. & Martinaitis, E. & Vyciene, G. & Kasiulis, E., 2015. "Riverine hydrokinetic resource assessment. A case study of a lowland river in Lithuania," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 643-652.
    9. Josimovic, Bosko & Crncevic, Tijana, 2012. "The development of renewable energy capacities in Serbia: Case study of three small hydropower plants in the “Golija” biosphere reserve with special reference to the landscape heritage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 537-544.
    10. Moriarty, Patrick & Honnery, Damon, 2016. "Can renewable energy power the future?," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 3-7.
    11. Sample, James E. & Duncan, Niall & Ferguson, Michael & Cooksley, Susan, 2015. "Scotland׳s hydropower: Current capacity, future potential and the possible impacts of climate change," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 111-122.
    12. McCombie, Charles & Jefferson, Michael, 2016. "Renewable and nuclear electricity: Comparison of environmental impacts," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 758-769.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Punys, Petras & Kvaraciejus, Algis & Dumbrauskas, Antanas & Šilinis, Linas & Popa, Bogdan, 2019. "An assessment of micro-hydropower potential at historic watermill, weir, and non-powered dam sites in selected EU countries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 1108-1123.
    2. Egidijus Kasiulis & Petras Punys & Algis Kvaraciejus & Antanas Dumbrauskas & Linas Jurevičius, 2020. "Small Hydropower in the Baltic States—Current Status and Potential for Future Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kałuża, Tomasz & Hämmerling, Mateusz & Zawadzki, Paweł & Czekała, Wojciech & Kasperek, Robert & Sojka, Mariusz & Mokwa, Marian & Ptak, Mariusz & Szkudlarek, Arkadiusz & Czechlowski, Mirosław & Dach, J, 2022. "The hydropower sector in Poland: Historical development and current status," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    2. Operacz, Agnieszka, 2017. "The term “effective hydropower potential” based on sustainable development – an initial case study of the Raba river in Poland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 1453-1463.
    3. Anita Kwartnik-Pruc & Aneta Mączyńska, 2022. "Assessing Validity of Employing Surveying Methods to Capture Data on Topography to Determine Hydrological and Topographic Parameters Essential for Selecting Locations for the Construction of Small Hyd," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-41, February.
    4. Tamm, Ottar & Tamm, Toomas, 2020. "Verification of a robust method for sizing and siting the small hydropower run-of-river plant potential by using GIS," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 153-159.
    5. Picchi, Paolo & van Lierop, Martina & Geneletti, Davide & Stremke, Sven, 2019. "Advancing the relationship between renewable energy and ecosystem services for landscape planning and design: A literature review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 241-259.
    6. Tahseen, Samiha & Karney, Bryan W., 2017. "Reviewing and critiquing published approaches to the sustainability assessment of hydropower," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 225-234.
    7. Tang, Shengwen & Chen, Jingtao & Sun, Peigui & Li, Yang & Yu, Peng & Chen, E., 2019. "Current and future hydropower development in Southeast Asia countries (Malaysia, Indonesia, Thailand and Myanmar)," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 239-249.
    8. Yi, Choong-Sung & Lee, Jin-Hee & Shim, Myung-Pil, 2010. "Site location analysis for small hydropower using geo-spatial information system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 852-861.
    9. Dallison, Richard J.H. & Patil, Sopan D., 2023. "Impact of climate change on hydropower potential in the UK and Ireland," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 611-628.
    10. Marco van Dijk & Stefanus Johannes van Vuuren & Giovanna Cavazzini & Chantel Monica Niebuhr & Alberto Santolin, 2022. "Optimizing Conduit Hydropower Potential by Determining Pareto-Optimal Trade-Off Curve," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    11. Kahraman, Gökhan & Yücel, Halit Lütfi & Öztop, Hakan F., 2009. "Evaluation of energy efficiency using thermodynamics analysis in a hydropower plant: A case study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1458-1465.
    12. Martínez-Martínez, Yenisleidy & Dewulf, Jo & Casas-Ledón, Yannay, 2022. "GIS-based site suitability analysis and ecosystem services approach for supporting renewable energy development in south-central Chile," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 363-376.
    13. Nieto, Jaime & Carpintero, Óscar & Miguel, Luis J. & de Blas, Ignacio, 2020. "Macroeconomic modelling under energy constraints: Global low carbon transition scenarios," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    14. Ghazala Aziz & Rida Waheed & Majid Ibrahim Alsaggaf, 2023. "Investigating the Impact of Green Natural Resources and Green Activities on Ecological Footprint: A Perspective of Saudi Vision 2030," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Yu, Bing & Xu, Linyu, 2016. "Review of ecological compensation in hydropower development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 729-738.
    16. Arias-Gaviria, Jessica & Osorio, Andres F. & Arango-Aramburo, Santiago, 2020. "Estimating the practical potential for deep ocean water extraction in the Caribbean," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 307-319.
    17. Laghari, J.A. & Mokhlis, H. & Bakar, A.H.A. & Mohammad, Hasmaini, 2013. "A comprehensive overview of new designs in the hydraulic, electrical equipments and controllers of mini hydro power plants making it cost effective technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 20(C), pages 279-293.
    18. Veronika Varvařovská & Michaela Staňková, 2021. "Does the Involvement of "Green Energy" Increase the Productivity of Companies in the Production of the Electricity Sector?," European Journal of Business Science and Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Faculty of Business and Economics, vol. 7(2), pages 152-164.
    19. Xiaoye Jin & Meiying Li & Fansheng Meng, 2019. "Comprehensive Evaluation of the New Energy Power Generation Development at the Regional Level: An Empirical Analysis from China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-15, December.
    20. Bart Hawkins Kreps, 2020. "Energy Sprawl in the Renewable‐Energy Sector: Moving to Sufficiency in a Post Growth Era," American Journal of Economics and Sociology, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 79(3), pages 719-749, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:80:y:2017:i:c:p:495-504. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.