IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v197y2024ics1364032124001412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantitative fault detection and diagnosis methods for vapour compression chillers: Exploring the potential for field-implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Ssembatya, Martin
  • Claridge, David E.

Abstract

Chiller fault detection and diagnosis can optimize building energy and maintenance costs. Previous reviews have largely overlooked the detailed assessment of chiller fault detection methods; this study focuses on chiller methods proposed since 2004. Categorized into regression-based, classification-based, and knowledge-based approaches, the study delves into their procedural aspects and practical implications for field-installed chillers such as availability of the required training parameters and information, accuracy versus energy performance fault impact, and complexity of required data. Classification-based methods are mostly supervised learning, and few have been validated with faulty chiller data from real-world installations. Over 90% of classification-based, over 70% of regression-based, and all knowledge-based surveyed methods were tested using experimental data only. Some measured parameters like the subcooling temperature, oil feed pressure, and oil sump temperature that are commonly used in model training for detection and diagnosis algorithms are rarely measured in field installations. Despite significant research efforts to enhance the early detection of refrigerant leakage and condenser fouling faults, studies indicate minimal impact of these faults at low severities. Justifying their early detection may primarily rely on environmental considerations. To bolster field implementation, incorporating common factory-installed sensor parameters in new method development or testing of existing ones is recommended. Means that can provide faulty data for classification-based methods should also be devised. Hybrid methods that incorporate experts’ knowledge in the detection and diagnosis algorithms are encouraged and more testing of existing methods with real-world installations to ensure applicability is recommended.

Suggested Citation

  • Ssembatya, Martin & Claridge, David E., 2024. "Quantitative fault detection and diagnosis methods for vapour compression chillers: Exploring the potential for field-implementation," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:197:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124001412
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114418
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124001412
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114418?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:197:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124001412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.