IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v96y2011i3p365-373.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability performance of safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low- and high-demand mode of operation

Author

Listed:
  • Jin, Hui
  • Lundteigen, Mary Ann
  • Rausand, Marvin

Abstract

Safety instrumented systems (SISs) are usually divided into two modes of operation, low-demand and high-demand. Unfortunately, this classification is not easy to justify and the available formulas that are used to quantify the reliability performance in these two modes of operation are unable to capture combined effects of functional testing, spurious activations, and successful responses to demands. This article discusses some important modeling issues for SIS reliability performance quantification, and demonstrates their implementation in a Markov model. The accuracy of the Markov model for a simple case study of a pressure transmitter is verified through comparison with a scenario-based formula, and it is shown that the Markov approach gives a sufficiently accurate result for all demand rates, covering both low- and high-demand modes of operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin, Hui & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin, 2011. "Reliability performance of safety instrumented systems: A common approach for both low- and high-demand mode of operation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 365-373.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:3:p:365-373
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832010002474
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2010.11.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin, 2008. "Spurious activation of safety instrumented systems in the oil and gas industry: Basic concepts and formulas," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(8), pages 1208-1217.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eisinger, S. & Oliveira, L.F., 2021. "Evaluating the safety integrity of safety systems for all values of the demand rate," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    2. Redutskiy, Yury & Camitz-Leidland, Cecilie M. & Vysochyna, Anastasiia & Anderson, Kristanna T. & Balycheva, Marina, 2021. "Safety systems for the oil and gas industrial facilities: Design, maintenance policy choice, and crew scheduling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Ding, Long & Wang, Hong & Jiang, Jin & Xu, Aidong, 2017. "SIL verification for SRS with diverse redundancy based on system degradation using reliability block diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 170-187.
    4. Gabriel, Angelito & Ozansoy, Cagil & Shi, Juan, 2018. "Developments in SIL determination and calculation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 148-161.
    5. Alizadeh, Siamak & Sriramula, Srinivas, 2018. "Impact of common cause failure on reliability performance of redundant safety related systems subject to process demand," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 129-150.
    6. Ding, Long & Wang, Hong & Kang, Kai & Wang, Kai, 2014. "A novel method for SIL verification based on system degradation using reliability block diagram," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 36-45.
    7. Cherfi, Abraham & Leeman, Michel & Meurville, Florent & Rauzy, Antoine, 2014. "Modeling automotive safety mechanisms: A Markovian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 42-49.
    8. Lijie, Chen & Tao, Tang & Xianqiong, Zhao & Schnieder, Eckehard, 2012. "Verification of the safety communication protocol in train control system using colored Petri net," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 8-18.
    9. Jon T Selvik & Eirik B Abrahamsen, 2017. "On the meaning of accuracy and precision in a risk analysis context," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(2), pages 91-100, April.
    10. Hokstad, Per, 2014. "Demand rate and risk reduction for safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 12-20.
    11. H. Metatla & M. Rouainia, 2022. "Functional and dysfunctional analysis of a safety instrumented system (SIS) through the common cause failures (CCFs) assessment. Case of high integrity protection pressure system (HIPPS)," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(4), pages 1932-1954, August.
    12. Redutskiy Yury & Balycheva Marina & Dybdahl Hendrik, 2022. "Employee scheduling and maintenance planning for safety systems at the remotely located oil and gas industrial facilities," Engineering Management in Production and Services, Sciendo, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qi, Meng & Kan, Yufeng & Li, Xun & Wang, Xiaoying & Zhao, Dongfeng & Moon, Il, 2020. "Spurious activation and operational integrity evaluation of redundant safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    2. Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin, 2009. "Architectural constraints in IEC 61508: Do they have the intended effect?," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 520-525.
    3. Meng, Huixing & Kloul, Leïla & Rauzy, Antoine, 2018. "Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 111-123.
    4. Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Rausand, Marvin & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer, 2009. "Integrating RAMS engineering and management with the safety life cycle of IEC 61508," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(12), pages 1894-1903.
    5. Longhi, Antonio Eduardo Bier & Pessoa, Artur Alves & Garcia, Pauli Adriano de Almada, 2015. "Multiobjective optimization of strategies for operation and testing of low-demand safety instrumented systems using a genetic algorithm and fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 525-538.
    6. Innal, Fares & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Liu, Yiliu & Barros, Anne, 2016. "PFDavg generalized formulas for SIS subject to partial and full periodic tests based on multi-phase Markov models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 160-170.
    7. Wu, Shengnan & Zhang, Laibin & Zheng, Wenpei & Liu, Yiliu & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Reliability modeling of subsea SISs partial testing subject to delayed restoration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Torres-Echeverría, A.C. & Martorell, S. & Thompson, H.A., 2009. "Modelling and optimization of proof testing policies for safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 838-854.
    9. Azizpour, Hooshyar & Lundteigen, Mary Ann, 2019. "Analysis of simplification in Markov-based models for performance assessment of Safety Instrumented System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 252-260.
    10. Fu, Jianmin & Li, Honghao & Chi, Yajuan & Zhen, Jia & Xu, Xiangfeng, 2021. "nSIL Evaluation and Sensitivity Study of Diverse Redundant Structure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    11. Innal, Fares & Dutuit, Yves & Chebila, Mourad, 2015. "Safety and operational integrity evaluation and design optimization of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 32-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:96:y:2011:i:3:p:365-373. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.