IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v95y2010i6p606-613.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Application of Petri nets to reliability prediction of occupant safety systems with partial detection and repair

Author

Listed:
  • Kleyner, Andre
  • Volovoi, Vitali

Abstract

This paper presents an application of stochastic Petri nets (SPN) to calculate the availability of safety critical on-demand systems. Traditional methods of estimating system reliability include standards—based or field return-based reliability prediction methods. These methods do not take into account the effect of fault-detection capability and penalize the addition of detection circuitry due to the higher parts count. Therefore, calculating system availability, which can be linked to the system's probability of failure on demand (Pfd), can be a better alternative to reliability prediction. The process of estimating the Pfd of a safety system can be further complicated by the presence of system imperfections such as partial-fault detection by users and untimely or uncompleted repairs. Additionally, most system failures cannot be represented by Poisson process Markov chain methods, which are commonly utilized for the purposes of estimating Pfd, as these methods are not well-suited for the analysis of non-Poisson failures. This paper suggests a methodology and presents a case study of SPN modeling adequately handling most of the above problems. The model will be illustrated with a case study of an automotive electronics airbag controller as an example of a safety critical on-demand system.

Suggested Citation

  • Kleyner, Andre & Volovoi, Vitali, 2010. "Application of Petri nets to reliability prediction of occupant safety systems with partial detection and repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(6), pages 606-613.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:95:y:2010:i:6:p:606-613
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832010000244
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2010.01.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sadou, Nabil & Demmou, Hamid, 2009. "Reliability analysis of discrete event dynamic systems with Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(11), pages 1848-1861.
    2. Clavareau, Julien & Labeau, Pierre-Etienne, 2009. "A Petri net-based modelling of replacement strategies under technological obsolescence," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 357-369.
    3. Chew, S.P. & Dunnett, S.J. & Andrews, J.D., 2008. "Phased mission modelling of systems with maintenance-free operating periods using simulated Petri nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 980-994.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song, Haifeng & Liu, Jieyu & Schnieder, Eckehard, 2017. "Validation, verification and evaluation of a Train to Train Distance Measurement System by means of Colored Petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 10-23.
    2. Jenab, K. & Sarfaraz, A. & Dhillon, B.S. & Seyed Hosseini, S.M., 2012. "Dynamic MLD analysis with flow graphs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 80-85.
    3. Wu, Xuedong & Chang, Yanchao & Mao, Jianxu & Du, Zhaoping, 2013. "Predicting reliability and failures of engine systems by single multiplicative neuron model with iterated nonlinear filters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 244-250.
    4. Simeu-Abazi, Zineb & Ahmad, Alali Alhouaij, 2011. "Optimisation of distributed maintenance: Modelling and application to the multi-factory production," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1564-1575.
    5. Wang, Chuan & Liu, Yupeng & Wang, Dongbo & Wang, Guorong & Wang, Dingya & Yu, Chao, 2021. "Reliability evaluation method based on dynamic fault diagnosis results: A case study of a seabed mud lifting system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    6. Stroeve, Sybert H. & Blom, Henk A.P. & Bakker, G.J. (Bert), 2013. "Contrasting safety assessments of a runway incursion scenario: Event sequence analysis versus multi-agent dynamic risk modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 133-149.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Simeu-Abazi, Zineb & Ahmad, Alali Alhouaij, 2011. "Optimisation of distributed maintenance: Modelling and application to the multi-factory production," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 1564-1575.
    2. Sheng, Jingyu & Prescott, Darren, 2017. "A hierarchical coloured Petri net model of fleet maintenance with cannibalisation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 290-305.
    3. Gonçalves, P. & Sobral, J. & Ferreira, L.A., 2017. "Unmanned aerial vehicle safety assessment modelling through petri Nets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 383-393.
    4. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Ayse Sena Eruguz & Tarkan Tan & Geert‐Jan van Houtum, 2017. "Optimizing usage and maintenance decisions for k‐out‐of‐n systems of moving assets," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(5), pages 418-434, August.
    6. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2023. "Reliability analysis of a BWR plant system at startup stage  - analysis by the GO-FLOW methodology with consideration of loop structures and phased mission problem -," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    7. Salomon, Julian & Winnewisser, Niklas & Wei, Pengfei & Broggi, Matteo & Beer, Michael, 2021. "Efficient reliability analysis of complex systems in consideration of imprecision," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Khanh T.P. Nguyen & Thomas Yeung & Bruno Castanier, 2017. "Acquisition of new technology information for maintenance and replacement policies," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(8), pages 2212-2231, April.
    9. Xiao-song Yang & Xiao-yue Wu & Xin-yang Wu, 2014. "Automated generation of mission reliability simulation model for space tracking, telemetry and control system by extensible markup language and extended object-oriented Petri net," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(4), pages 397-408, August.
    10. Simeu-Abazi, Zineb & Lefebvre, Arnaud & Derain, Jean-Pierre, 2011. "A methodology of alarm filtering using dynamic fault tree," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 257-266.
    11. Lai, Hsueh-Yi & Chen, Chun-Hsien & Zheng, Pai & Khoo, Li Pheng, 2020. "Investigating the evolving context of an unstable approach in aviation from mental model disconnects with an agent-based model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    12. Xu, Jintao & Gui, Maolei & Ding, Rui & Dai, Tao & Zheng, Mengyan & Men, Xinhong & Meng, Fanpeng & Yu, Tao & Sui, Yang, 2023. "A new approach for dynamic reliability analysis of reactor protection system for HPR1000," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    13. Tiedo Tinga & Rene Janssen, 2013. "The interplay between deployment and optimal maintenance intervals for complex multi-component systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(3), pages 227-240, June.
    14. Yu, Haiyue & Wu, Xinyang & Wu, Xiaoyue, 2020. "An extended object-oriented petri net model for mission reliability evaluation of phased-mission system with time redundancy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Fritzsche, R., 2012. "Cost adjustment for single item pooling models using a dynamic failure rate: A calculation for the aircraft industry," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 1065-1079.
    16. Nguyen, T.P.K. & Castanier, Bruno & Yeung, Thomas G., 2014. "Maintaining a system subject to uncertain technological evolution," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 56-65.
    17. Xia, Tangbin & Xi, Lifeng & Pan, Ershun & Ni, Jun, 2017. "Reconfiguration-oriented opportunistic maintenance policy for reconfigurable manufacturing systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 87-98.
    18. Yan, Rundong & Dunnett, Sarah & Andrews, John, 2023. "A Petri net model-based resilience analysis of nuclear power plants under the threat of natural hazards," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    19. Peng, Rui & Zhai, Qingqing & Xing, Liudong & Yang, Jun, 2014. "Reliability of demand-based phased-mission systems subject to fault level coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 18-25.
    20. Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Wang, Chaonan, 2012. "Reliability of k-out-of-n systems with phased-mission requirements and imperfect fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 45-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:95:y:2010:i:6:p:606-613. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.