IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v224y2022ics0951832022002034.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates based on irrelevance coverage model

Author

Listed:
  • Zhou, Siwei
  • Ye, Luyao
  • Xiong, Shengwu
  • Xiang, Jianwen

Abstract

The irrelevance coverage model (ICM) is an extension of the imperfect fault coverage model (IFCM), which can reduce the risk of uncovered component failures by isolating irrelevant components in systems. However, the ICM has been limited to static systems so far. To address this issue, we extend the ICM to dynamic systems modeled by dynamic fault trees (DFTs) with Priority-AND (PAND) gates. The component irrelevance is analyzed in the DFTs, which shows a component could become irrelevant due to specific sequence failures of some other components, and the implication of irrelevancy may differ from that in static systems. The definition of minimal irrelevance triggers (MITs) and the reduction rules are introduced based on the temporal algebraic framework. The sum of disjoint products (SDP) method is further applied for the quantitative analysis of system reliability. Case studies demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Furthermore, the ICM can also play a role in the dynamic systems in terms of reliability improvement compared to the IFCM.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhou, Siwei & Ye, Luyao & Xiong, Shengwu & Xiang, Jianwen, 2022. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates based on irrelevance coverage model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:224:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022002034
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2022.108553
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832022002034
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2022.108553?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xing, Liudong & Shrestha, Akhilesh & Dai, Yuanshun, 2011. "Exact combinatorial reliability analysis of dynamic systems with sequence-dependent failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1375-1385.
    2. Hu, Lunhu & Kang, Rui & Pan, Xing & Zuo, Dujun, 2020. "Risk assessment of uncertain random system—Level-1 and level-2 joint propagation of uncertainty and probability in fault tree analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Nejad, Hamed S. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Mosleh, Ali, 2022. "Automatic generation of event sequence diagrams for guiding simulation based dynamic probabilistic risk assessment (SIMPRA) of complex systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    4. Ding, Rui & Liu, Zehua & Xu, Jintao & Meng, Fanpeng & Sui, Yang & Men, Xinhong, 2021. "A novel approach for reliability assessment of residual heat removal system for HPR1000 based on failure mode and effect analysis, fault tree analysis, and fuzzy Bayesian network methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    5. Kumar, Pankaj & Jain, Madhu, 2020. "Reliability analysis of a multi-component machining system with service interruption, imperfect coverage, and reboot," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    6. Peng, Rui & Mo, Huadong & Xie, Min & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Optimal structure of multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 18-25.
    7. Wang, Guanjun & Peng, Rui & Xing, Liudong, 2018. "Reliability evaluation of unrepairable k-out-of-n: G systems with phased-mission requirements based on record values," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 191-197.
    8. Rui Peng & Qingqinq Zhai & Liudong Xing & Jun Yang, 2016. "Reliability analysis and optimal structure of series-parallel phased-mission systems subject to fault-level coverage," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 48(8), pages 736-746, August.
    9. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    10. Ghadhab, Majdi & Junges, Sebastian & Katoen, Joost-Pieter & Kuntz, Matthias & Volk, Matthias, 2019. "Safety analysis for vehicle guidance systems with dynamic fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 37-50.
    11. Zhang, Aibo & Srivastav, Himanshu & Barros, Anne & Liu, Yiliu, 2021. "Study of testing and maintenance strategies for redundant final elements in SIS with imperfect detection of degraded state," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    12. Merle, G. & Roussel, J.-M. & Lesage, J.-J., 2011. "Algebraic determination of the structure function of Dynamic Fault Trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(2), pages 267-277.
    13. Peng, Rui & Zhai, Qingqing & Xing, Liudong & Yang, Jun, 2014. "Reliability of demand-based phased-mission systems subject to fault level coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 18-25.
    14. Yen, Tseng-Chang & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2020. "Cost benefit analysis of four retrial systems with warm standby units and imperfect coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    15. Jung, Sejin & Yoo, Junbeom & Lee, Young-Jun, 2020. "A Software Fault Tree Analysis Technique for Formal Requirement Specifications of Nuclear Reactor Protection Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    16. Gascard, Eric & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb, 2018. "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 487-504.
    17. Q. Zhai & R. Peng & L. Xing & J. Yang, 2015. "Reliability of demand‐based warm standby systems subject to fault level coverage," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 380-393, May.
    18. Wang, Chuan & Liu, Yupeng & Wang, Dongbo & Wang, Guorong & Wang, Dingya & Yu, Chao, 2021. "Reliability evaluation method based on dynamic fault diagnosis results: A case study of a seabed mud lifting system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    19. Matsuoka, Takeshi, 2021. "Procedure to solve mutually dependent Fault Trees (FT with loops)," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    20. Wu, Chia-Huang & Yen, Tseng-Chang & Wang, Kuo-Hsiung, 2021. "Availability and Comparison of Four Retrial Systems with Imperfect Coverage and General Repair Times," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    21. Wang, Chaonan & Liu, Qiongyang & Xing, Liudong & Guan, Quanlong & Yang, Chunhui & Yu, Min, 2022. "Reliability analysis of smart home sensor systems subject to competing failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    22. Yuge, T. & Yanagi, S., 2008. "Quantitative analysis of a fault tree with priority AND gates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1577-1583.
    23. Chiacchio, Ferdinando & Iacono, Alessandra & Compagno, Lucio & D'Urso, Diego, 2020. "A general framework for dependability modelling coupling discrete-event and time-driven simulation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrews, John & Tolo, Silvia, 2023. "Dynamic and dependent tree theory (D2T2): A framework for the analysis of fault trees with dependent basic events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Wang, Shaoxuan & Yao, Yuantao & Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Zhixian & Wu, Jie & Yu, Jie, 2023. "Reliability evaluation of standby redundant systems based on the survival signatures methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).
    3. Li, Jingkui & Lu, Yuze & Liu, Xiaona & Jiang, Xiuhong, 2023. "Reliability analysis of cold-standby phased-mission system based on GO-FLOW methodology and the universal generating function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    4. Yılmaz, Emre & German, Brian J. & Pritchett, Amy R., 2023. "Optimizing resource allocations to improve system reliability via the propagation of statistical moments through fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yılmaz, Emre & German, Brian J. & Pritchett, Amy R., 2023. "Optimizing resource allocations to improve system reliability via the propagation of statistical moments through fault trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    2. Xu, Jintao & Gui, Maolei & Ding, Rui & Dai, Tao & Zheng, Mengyan & Men, Xinhong & Meng, Fanpeng & Yu, Tao & Sui, Yang, 2023. "A new approach for dynamic reliability analysis of reactor protection system for HPR1000," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    3. Gascard, Eric & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb, 2018. "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 487-504.
    4. Peng, Rui & Wu, Di & Xiao, Hui & Xing, Liudong & Gao, Kaiye, 2019. "Redundancy versus protection for a non-reparable phased-mission system subject to external impacts," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    5. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    6. Piriou, Pierre-Yves & Faure, Jean-Marc & Lesage, Jean-Jacques, 2017. "Generalized Boolean logic Driven Markov Processes: A powerful modeling framework for Model-Based Safety Analysis of dynamic repairable and reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 57-68.
    7. Cheng, Chen & Yang, Jun & Li, Lei, 2020. "Reliability assessment of multi-state phased mission systems with common bus performance sharing considering transmission loss and performance storage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    8. Wang, Chaonan & Xing, Liudong & Amari, Suprasad V. & Tang, Bo, 2020. "Efficient reliability analysis of dynamic k-out-of-n heterogeneous phased-mission systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    9. Haiyue Yu & Xiaoyue Wu, 2021. "A method for transformation from dynamic fault tree to binary decision diagram," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 416-430, June.
    10. Wang, Guanjun & Peng, Rui & Xing, Liudong, 2018. "Reliability evaluation of unrepairable k-out-of-n: G systems with phased-mission requirements based on record values," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 191-197.
    11. Cheng, Chen & Yang, Jun & Li, Lei, 2021. "Reliability evaluation of a k-out-of-n(G)-subsystem based multi-state phased mission system with common bus performance sharing subjected to common cause failures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    12. Jia, Heping & Ding, Yi & Peng, Rui & Liu, Hanlin & Song, Yonghua, 2020. "Reliability assessment and activation sequence optimization of non-repairable multi-state generation systems considering warm standby," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    13. Ke Chen & Xian Zhao & Qingan Qiu, 2022. "Optimal Task Abort and Maintenance Policies Considering Time Redundancy," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, April.
    14. Huang, Chao & Li, Liang, 2020. "Architectural design and analysis of a steer-by-wire system in view of functional safety concept," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Zhu, Xiaoning & Yan, Rui & Peng, Rui & Zhang, Zhongxin, 2020. "Optimal routing, loading and aborting of UAVs executing both visiting tasks and transportation tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    16. Levitin, Gregory & Xing, Liudong & Dai, Yuanshun, 2023. "Standby mode transfer schedule minimizing downtime of 1-out-of-N system with storage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    17. Wang, Kuo-Hsiung & Wu, Chia-Huang & Yen, Tseng-Chang, 2022. "Comparative cost-benefit analysis of four retrial systems with preventive maintenance and unreliable service station," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    18. Zhao, Xian & Fan, Yu & Qiu, Qingan & Chen, Ke, 2021. "Multi-criteria mission abort policy for systems subject to two-stage degradation process," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 295(1), pages 233-245.
    19. Heping Jia & Rui Peng & Yi Ding & Yonghua Song, 2019. "Reliability of demand-based warm standby system with common bus performance sharing," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 580-592, August.
    20. Mohammad Nadjafi & Mohammad Ali Farsi, 2021. "Reliability analysis of system with timing functional dependency using fuzzy-bathtub failure rates," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(5), pages 919-930, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:224:y:2022:i:c:s0951832022002034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.