IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v216y2021ics0951832021004397.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Data-driven polynomial chaos expansions for characterization of complex fluid rheology: Case study of phosphate slurry

Author

Listed:
  • El Moçayd, Nabil
  • Seaid, Mohammed

Abstract

Mine transportation through hydraulic pipelines is increasingly used by various industries around the world. In Morocco, this has been implemented for the case of phosphate transportation. This allows to increase the production and reduce the transportation cost. Given the vital importance of phosphate in the global food security and regarding the huge amount of phosphate rock reserves in Morocco, it is detrimental to assess the reliability, to optimize and to increase its transportation in a safe manner. Usually hydraulic transportation of such fluids is fully quantified with a full characterization of its rheology related to its non-Newtonian behavior. The rheology allows to know the viscous and the elastic properties of a fluid exhibiting viscoelastic properties. In the case of water-phosphate slurry this behavior is not well-documented and classical constitutive laws for the rheology are of limited used, because of the high variability of different physico-chemical components of the slurry. The present work aims at quantifying the sensitivity of the water-phosphate slurry rheology to these components. In order to achieve this objective, a data-driven model based on polynomial chaos expansions (PCE) is developed and investigated. The choice of this class of models is motivated by the simplicity to conduct sensitivity analysis with the PCE and the limited amount of data available as the water-phosphate slurry pipeline is very new. In order to alleviate further the impact of the limitation given by the available data, we introduce the bagging technique which is an Ensemble based data-driven model using the PCE. Results presented in this study demonstrate that the bagging allows to reduce the validation error of the model by up to two orders of magnitude. Thus, it reduces considerably the variability on the estimation of hyperparameters in the model. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis shows that the variability on the elasticity coefficient is mainly due to the variability of the slurry density and the solid rate. Viscosity on the other side is not affected by the heterogeneity of the granulation distribution.

Suggested Citation

  • El Moçayd, Nabil & Seaid, Mohammed, 2021. "Data-driven polynomial chaos expansions for characterization of complex fluid rheology: Case study of phosphate slurry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021004397
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107923
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832021004397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2021.107923?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cooper, James & Lombardi, Rachel & Boardman, David & Carliell-Marquet, Cynthia, 2011. "The future distribution and production of global phosphate rock reserves," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 78-86.
    2. Dubreuil, S. & Berveiller, M. & Petitjean, F. & Salaün, M., 2014. "Construction of bootstrap confidence intervals on sensitivity indices computed by polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 263-275.
    3. Elmaz, Furkan & Yücel, Özgün & Mutlu, Ali Yener, 2020. "Predictive modeling of biomass gasification with machine learning-based regression methods," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    4. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    5. Sudret, Bruno, 2008. "Global sensitivity analysis using polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 964-979.
    6. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    7. Crestaux, Thierry & Le Maıˆtre, Olivier & Martinez, Jean-Marc, 2009. "Polynomial chaos expansion for sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(7), pages 1161-1172.
    8. Chengcheng Tao & Barbara G. Kutchko & Eilis Rosenbaum & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2020. "A Review of Rheological Modeling of Cement Slurry in Oil Well Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-55, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chunyan, Ling & Jingzhe, Lei & Way, Kuo, 2022. "Bayesian support vector machine for optimal reliability design of modular systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Yao, Wen & Zheng, Xiaohu & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Ning & Tang, Guijian, 2023. "Deep adaptive arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion: A mini-data-driven semi-supervised method for uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    3. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2023. "Extended sample-based approach for efficient sensitivity analysis of group of random variables," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    4. Thapa, Mishal & Missoum, Samy, 2022. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis of composite wind turbine blades," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    5. Kröker, Ilja & Oladyshkin, Sergey, 2022. "Arbitrary multi-resolution multi-wavelet-based polynomial chaos expansion for data-driven uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Turati, Pietro & Pedroni, Nicola & Zio, Enrico, 2017. "Simulation-based exploration of high-dimensional system models for identifying unexpected events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 317-330.
    2. Melito, Gian Marco & Müller, Thomas Stephan & Badeli, Vahid & Ellermann, Katrin & Brenn, Günter & Reinbacher-Köstinger, Alice, 2021. "Sensitivity analysis study on the effect of the fluid mechanics assumptions for the computation of electrical conductivity of flowing human blood," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Oladyshkin, Sergey & Nowak, Wolfgang, 2018. "Incomplete statistical information limits the utility of high-order polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 137-148.
    4. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Wenjie & Wang, Donghui & Zhao, Kun & Zhang, Weihua, 2019. "Global sensitivity analysis using orthogonal augmented radial basis function," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 291-302.
    5. Daniel Harenberg & Stefano Marelli & Bruno Sudret & Viktor Winschel, 2019. "Uncertainty quantification and global sensitivity analysis for economic models," Quantitative Economics, Econometric Society, vol. 10(1), pages 1-41, January.
    6. Shang, Xiaobing & Su, Li & Fang, Hai & Zeng, Bowen & Zhang, Zhi, 2023. "An efficient multi-fidelity Kriging surrogate model-based method for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    7. Puppo, L. & Pedroni, N. & Maio, F. Di & Bersano, A. & Bertani, C. & Zio, E., 2021. "A Framework based on Finite Mixture Models and Adaptive Kriging for Characterizing Non-Smooth and Multimodal Failure Regions in a Nuclear Passive Safety System," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    8. Lambert, Romain S.C. & Lemke, Frank & Kucherenko, Sergei S. & Song, Shufang & Shah, Nilay, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using sparse high dimensional model representations generated by the group method of data handling," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 42-54.
    9. Brown, S. & Beck, J. & Mahgerefteh, H. & Fraga, E.S., 2013. "Global sensitivity analysis of the impact of impurities on CO2 pipeline failure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 43-54.
    10. Yun, Wanying & Lu, Zhenzhou & Jiang, Xian, 2019. "An efficient method for moment-independent global sensitivity analysis by dimensional reduction technique and principle of maximum entropy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 174-182.
    11. Chen, Xin & Molina-Cristóbal, Arturo & Guenov, Marin D. & Riaz, Atif, 2019. "Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 97-115.
    12. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    13. Wu, Zeping & Wang, Donghui & Okolo N, Patrick & Hu, Fan & Zhang, Weihua, 2016. "Global sensitivity analysis using a Gaussian Radial Basis Function metamodel," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 171-179.
    14. Ehre, Max & Papaioannou, Iason & Straub, Daniel, 2020. "Global sensitivity analysis in high dimensions with PLS-PCE," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Xiang Peng & Xiaoqing Xu & Jiquan Li & Shaofei Jiang, 2021. "A Sampling-Based Sensitivity Analysis Method Considering the Uncertainties of Input Variables and Their Distribution Parameters," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-18, May.
    16. Liu, Yaning & Yousuff Hussaini, M. & Ökten, Giray, 2016. "Accurate construction of high dimensional model representation with applications to uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 281-295.
    17. Wang, Zequn & Chen, Wei, 2016. "Time-variant reliability assessment through equivalent stochastic process transformation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 166-175.
    18. Anstett-Collin, F. & Goffart, J. & Mara, T. & Denis-Vidal, L., 2015. "Sensitivity analysis of complex models: Coping with dynamic and static inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 268-275.
    19. Horiguchi, Akira & Pratola, Matthew T. & Santner, Thomas J., 2021. "Assessing variable activity for Bayesian regression trees," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    20. Kröker, Ilja & Oladyshkin, Sergey, 2022. "Arbitrary multi-resolution multi-wavelet-based polynomial chaos expansion for data-driven uncertainty quantification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:216:y:2021:i:c:s0951832021004397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.